MY ‘BOSSES’ IN THE EVOLUTION OF PROPERTARIANISM
You know it’s funny but Propertarianism is no longer a solo effort. I have a manager, an editor, and multiple advisors, helpful critics, and in some cases, people who are better than I am at USING propertarianism. And it feels a little bit like I’m an engineer on a project trying to create infrastructure.
🙂
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-09 03:51:00 UTC
PROPERTARIANISM: WE TOOK THE FAMILY FOR GRANTED
We spend all this time, text and talk on the individual, women, government and economy. But we took the structure of reproduction for granted.
We compete, using 1) the structure of tribal competition, 2) the structure of reproduction, 3) structure of pedagogy, 4) structure of production, and 5) structure of commons.
Liberalism has been nothing more than an exercise in hedonistic consumption at the expense of the civilization that made that consumption possible. We destroyed the family. And with it, our civilization.
It’s solvable. But it’s going to require blood and treasure to do it.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-09 03:05:00 UTC
http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2014/12/07/house-chooses-new-cold-war-with-russia/Roman we need to take theses people out and expose them as Russian funded propagandists.
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-08 13:15:00 UTC
http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2014/12/weve-habituated-to-rigged-fraudulent.htmlObvious.
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-08 13:12:00 UTC
http://www.aei.org/publication/study-minimum-wage-hikes-made-great-recession-worse-low-skill-workers/Obvious to Austrians: recent minimum wage increases are harmful
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-08 13:04:00 UTC
PROPERTARIANISM VS NEOREACTION (NRx)
(draft)
I tend to see Propertarianism as Post-Neo-Reactionary. Although, it may be more accurate to position NRx as a rationalist program in the continental and moral traditional, and Propertarianism as an analytic program in the anglo scientific tradition – but both making the same criticism: the evolution of the cathedral, the failure of the enlightenment program, and the necessity to return to modernity (science) and away from postmodernism (pseudoscience, cosmopolitanism and neo-puritanism).
The most important difference is that Propertarianism is not so much reactionary as it is revolutionary. In that literally I am working on a program to cause a revolution. However, I don’t recommend a return to the past at all, but an evolution of the classical liberal model of government that serves the wants and needs of post-industrial individuals, families (or lack of), societies, economies.
Propertarianism—-NeoReaction
Scientific————-Rational
Analytic————–Allegorical
Solution————-Criticism
Legal—————–Moral
Progressive——–Reactionary
Prescriptive——–Descriptive
Institutional———Technical
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-07 23:57:00 UTC
Journey: Following the truth wherever it takes you whether you like it or not.
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-07 22:29:00 UTC
(truth: I lucked out in no small part ’cause I was good-looking enough to compensate for the liability. People give you lots of leeway if you’re attractive. And if you smile a lot, work at having good manners and listen to them carefully, they give you even more. But man it was very hard to be a child in my part of the world in that era. Damn. I haven’t thought about it much, but believe it or not I didn’t say much either. And that helped too. No point talking when no one understands you – smiling and listening work better. Books are your friends. Today kids like us have internet, computers and other toys to amuse ourselves with. But a small farm town with three television channels is a pretty boring place for an infovore. )
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-07 22:26:00 UTC
NORTH SEA TRUTH VS LEVANTINE CRITIQUE
(profound)(group evolutionary strategies)(macro-sociology)
Once you grasp that Cosmopolitan (Marxist-Socialist, Libertine, Neoconservative) Critique is an attempt at exclusionary authoritarianism – a modern restatement of the technique applied in Jewish argument and law – it becomes fairly obvious why the combination of (a) desire for obscurant arguments to be true, (b) emotional and intellectual investment in the truth of these obscurant arguments, and (c) hostility to refutation, are so pervasive: 1) psychological utility obtained from intuitional moral ‘righteousness’, 2)group unity in that moral conviction, and 3) ostracization of non-believers on the other, are precisely what ‘separatists’ require of a religion.
However, this modern set of religions is pseudo-scientific and pseudo-rational rather than legal, mystical and monotheistic in verbal construction. But the verbal construction is merely a technological advancement over monotheistic mythology, and jewish dual-ethics-law.
Northern europeans used truth, property and fighting as the binding commitment to one another, not belief. We used opportunity to join success in a hostile landscape, and they used threat of ostracization in among hostile tribes. We are all the product of our ancient geographies.
The strategies of the weak and small in number, versus the strong and small in number. Both Jewish and Germanic systems of thought evolved for use by small populations.
You will take notice which strategy leads to the construction of vast civilizations, technology, art, science and medicine, and what the other led to – near extermination.
Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-07 21:30:00 UTC
Yes, well I know we are arguing ‘Autistically’, by which you mean ‘caclulatively’ rather than ‘intuitively’. But that is not a criticism, any more than employing any other form of logic or calculation is open to criticism. The question is only whether we are making statements that are more truthful than the statements you make with your intuition. And we can demonstrate that our statements are more truthful than your intuition. Which should not be surprising, since your intuition quite often lies not only lies to you, but causes you to unknowingly lie to the rest of us.
Source date (UTC): 2014-12-07 14:51:00 UTC