Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Technically speaking modern conservatism is a pretty young strategy. It’s not re

    Technically speaking modern conservatism is a pretty young strategy. It’s not really surprising that it should take us this long to put it together.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 09:58:00 UTC

  • Don. Where is your head at on the Drudge Thing? Still on deck or no? Don Finnega

    Don. Where is your head at on the Drudge Thing? Still on deck or no?

    Don Finnegan


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 09:18:00 UTC

  • QUARTERLY REMINDER – WHAT I DO HERE – FAIR WARNING! For new friends and follower

    QUARTERLY REMINDER – WHAT I DO HERE – FAIR WARNING!

    For new friends and followers, please understand what I do here on FB. It is my sketch pad. I work in public like a village blacksmith where you can peer into the forge and see the experimental work being done – good and bad.

    Propertarianism is a very special thing and you can learn a lot about the world by following me. But it does require that you keep in mind that I am constantly using the community as an experimental pool to test ideas and seek criticism.

    I am slaying a few hundred years of sacred western ideas, and doing so mercilously. This often requires that I experiment in everything from very rigorous philosophy, to the most general of aphorisms and narratives. Some of which are guaranteed to offend you. (And me sometimes, too.)

    But my goal is to capture what made the west competitively successful in our history in formal logical and scientific terms – for the first time, to capture it as an analytic political philosophy, recommend formal institutions, espouse it as an ideology, and provide moral authority for revolution, the strategic and tactical means of conducting that revolution.

    I am not so much a populist as an engineer. Its not my job to be popular. It’s my job to discover the truth.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 08:42:00 UTC

  • Entrepreneurs innovate. Property is necessary for calculation and incentives. Tr

    Entrepreneurs innovate. Property is necessary for calculation and incentives. Trust is necessary for economic velocity (rates). As complexity expands so does the means of free riding and theft, so legal prohibitions must expand in criminal, ethical, moral, conspiratorial coverage at a marginally indifferent rate from the complexity of associations in order to maintain trust and economic velocity.

    This state of affairs is only possible in homogenous polities.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 08:27:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 08:27:00 UTC

  • HOW TO PRESENT MISES AND RAND IN THE 20th CENTURY? I would present it (as I do)

    HOW TO PRESENT MISES AND RAND IN THE 20th CENTURY?

    I would present it (as I do) as a last ditch desperate attempt to reach the enlightenment utopia embodied in both cosmopolitan middle class universalism, and anglo puritanical middle class universalism.

    But that both movements were failures and had to be, because universalism and equality are merely utilitarian merchant philosophies of self interest made possible by temporary economic advantage.

    And that the dream of a market of everyone or the dream of an aristocracy of everybody, are ideological fancies that are politically untenable, largely undesirable, and competitively unsuccessful.

    As such the virtue of the program is limited to the insights into cooperation made possible by information. And that our institutional problem across the past four millennia remains the constant need to improve means of information use and distribution as the scale and diversity of the division of labor expands analogistically to fractal evolution into all parts of human existence.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 08:22:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 07:20:00 UTC

  • WHAT ALLOWS RUSSIA, CHINA AND ISRAEL TO CONDUCT INFORMATION WARFARE AGAINST THE

    WHAT ALLOWS RUSSIA, CHINA AND ISRAEL TO CONDUCT INFORMATION WARFARE AGAINST THE WEST?

    While we don’t tolerate it from others.

    (I know the answer)


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 05:26:00 UTC

  • RON PAUL AS KREMLIN STOOGE —“Lack of transparency in funding and the blurring

    RON PAUL AS KREMLIN STOOGE

    —“Lack of transparency in funding and the blurring of distinctions between think tanks and lobbying helps the Kremlin push its agendas forward without due scrutiny.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 05:15:00 UTC

  • THE KREMLIN TOOLKIT – INFORMATION WARFARE • The Kremlin exploits the idea of fre

    THE KREMLIN TOOLKIT – INFORMATION WARFARE

    • The Kremlin exploits the idea of freedom of information to inject disinformation into society. The effect is not to persuade (as in classic public diplomacy) or earn credibility but to sow confusion via conspiracy theories and proliferate falsehoods.

    • The West’s acquiescence to sheltering corrupt Russian money demoralizes the Russian opposition while making the West more dependent on the Kremlin.

    • Unlike in the Cold War, when Soviets largely supported leftist groups, a fluid approach to ideology now allows the Kremlin to simultaneously back far-left and far-right movements, greens, anti-globalists and financial elites. The aim is to exacerbate divides and create an echo chamber of Kremlin support.

    • The Kremlin exploits the openness of liberal democracies to use the Orthodox Church and expatriate NGOs to further aggressive foreign policy goals.

    • There is an attempt to co-opt parts of the expert community in the West via such bodies as the Valdai Forum, which critics accuse of swapping access for acquiescence. Other senior Western experts are given positions in Russian companies and become de facto communications representatives of the Kremlin.

    • Financial PR firms and hired influencers help the Kremlin’s cause by arguing that “finance and politics should be kept separate.” But whereas the liberal idea of globalization sees money as politically neutral, with global commerce leading to peace and interdependence, the Kremlin uses the openness of global markets as an opportunity to employ money, commerce and energy as foreign policy weapons.

    • The Kremlin is increasing its “information war” budget. RT, which includes multilingual rolling news, a wire service and radio channels, has an estimated budget of over $300 million, set to increase by 41% to include German- and French- language channels. There is increasing use of social media to spread disinformation and trolls to attack publications and personalities.

    • The weaponization of information, culture and money is a vital part of the Kremlin’s hybrid, or non-linear, war, which combines the above elements with covert and small-scale military operations. The conflict in Ukraine saw non-linear war in action. Other rising authoritarian states will look to copy Moscow’s model of hybrid war—and the West has no institutional or analytical tools to deal with it.

    Defining Western Weak Spots

    • The Kremlin applies different approaches to different regions across the world, using local rivalries and resentments to divide and conquer.

    • The Kremlin exploits systemic weak spots in the Western system, providing a sort of X-ray of the underbelly of liberal democracy.

    • Offshore zones and opaque shell companies help sustain Kremlin corruption and aid its influence. For journalists, the threat of libel means few publications are ready to take on Kremlin-connected figures.

    • Lack of transparency in funding and the blurring of distinctions between think tanks and lobbying helps the Kremlin push its agendas forward without due scrutiny.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-12-10 05:15:00 UTC