Author: Curt Doolittle

I believe nothing, as I am an epistemologist, scientist and operationalist – though I am aware that in all eras there are advangages, or opportunities, made possible by geographic, demographic, technological and conceptual conditions of the moment that people with the ability to do so with the incentive to organize by intent, common interest, or pragmatic utility, knowingly or not, to exploit, and in doing so claim they are ‘doing good’ despite that their efforts produce externalities, and that those externalities often deprive people of choices they might otherwise make that would not produce those externalities. In this, there is no difference between the ages and civilizations other than the greater or lesser utility of each of the three means of human coercion. The primary problem of the age is the failure of states (other than france) to capture fiat money (central banks) so that dividends of government are preserved for the people rather than privatized. And I further understand that the monarchies should have, and would best have, been stewards of these treasuries instead of governments. I further understand that the central subsequent problem has been the introduction of women and a specific group that practices the female group strategy, and that this pairing is the only material source of western civilizational problems as the combination of finance hostile interest, and feminine interest in responsibilty evasion work their way through the institutions of cultural production – as they intended to.

Reply addressees: @BobbyBrisket