http://www.propertarianism.com/2013/11/26/the-problem-of-ratio-moral-versus-ratio-scientific-arguments/RATIO-MORAL VS RATIO-SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS
(learning propertarianism)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 08:56:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/2013/11/26/the-problem-of-ratio-moral-versus-ratio-scientific-arguments/RATIO-MORAL VS RATIO-SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTS
(learning propertarianism)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-25 08:56:00 UTC
THE LIMITS OF INTELLIGENCE AND THE CHALLENGE OF ERROR
(life’s wisdom)
At some point, it seems that greater intelligence is less influential than lack of wishful thinking, lack of accumulated error, accumulating knowledge, the time you invest in problem solving, and choosing a narrow field of inquiry.
Most smart people I meet suffer from wishful thinking and accumulated error.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 17:46:00 UTC
My road warrior days are over I think. Cars are OK. But the whole airport thing is out of control now. It’s tragic.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 13:06:00 UTC
QUESTION: How successful are the french and german educational systems in performing class sortition ostensibly by demonstrated merit?
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 09:09:00 UTC
ARISTOCRACY (PATRIARCHY) IS A CRITICAL RESPONSIBILTY: WE SET LIMITS. WE DON’T ENGAGE IN ADVOCACY. WE PRODUCE THE FIRST COMMONS: THE REQUIREMENT FOR PRODUCTIVE COOPERATION.
Our function is to incrementally but consistently evolve our people (and prevent their devolution) by preventing parasitism, and forcing productive cooperation. We force the development of markets for good and services by prohibiting parasitism. We force the production of markets for commons by prohibiting parasitism.
There is a great difference between RULE (conflict resolution) and GOVERNANCE (production of commons). Our function is to RULE (judiciary, rule of law, property rights, property en-toto.) The entrepreneurial aristocracy’s function is to organize PRODUCTION using the voluntary organization of production. Our gossip class’s function is to ADVOCATE for the allocation of resources to particular ends. But in all cases we must prevent parasitism.
It is epistemologically impossible for an aristocratic minority to police all of these functions for parasitism without tyranny. It is on the other hand, trivially easy for individuals to police these functions for parasitism without tyranny. The means by which we engage individuals in the process of policing is to grant them universal standing in the prosecution of parasitism, expressed as the right to property-en-toto, and to include them in the restitution under conspiracy if they fail to prosecute parasitism.
Our function is to create order by prohibiting parasitism- to create the first commons: cooperation (property-en-toto). Not to advocate. Others’ functions are to produce goods and services for the commons, and advocate for and produce commons.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:53:00 UTC
COOPERATION ITSELF IS THE MOST SCARCE MOST VALUABLE GOOD.
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:22:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/the-evolution-of-cooperation/THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION
(important for understanding the evolution of property rights)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:06:00 UTC
YOU’RE EMPIRICALLY INCAPABLE OF SELF RULE IF YOUR PEOPLE ARE RUNNING TO THE WEST.
Either fix your problem at home, hire us to fix it for you (it’s quite easy if your honest to fix a society). And if you do neither, out of defense, we must start a new program of colonization and modernization out of our own self defense.
It is not our burden. Its our defense.
You have no right to externalize your failures.
We have no right to externalize our failures (democracy and equality)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 08:00:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/09/28/the-evolution-of-cooperation/THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION
(learning propertarianism)
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 07:28:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/02/propertarianism-vs-rothbardiansm/A SHORT COURSE IN SUPPRESSION OF PARASITISM
(learning propertarianism)
MORAL OBJECTIVITY
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/17/moral-objectivity-or-relativity/
THE BASIS OF SOCIAL ORDER: PROPERTY OR PROHIBITION ON FREE RIDING?
http://www.propertarianism.com/2014/05/15/which-is-the-basis-of-social-order-the-prohibition-on-free-riding-vs-the-promotion-of-private-property/
PROPERTY-EN-TOTO (DEMONSTRATED PROPERTY)
http://www.propertarianism.com/demonstrated-property/
THE PROBLEM OF A SUFFICIENT BASIS OF LAW
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/02/propertarianism-vs-rothbardiansm/
STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF LAW IN PROPERTARIANISM
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/13/strict-construction-under-propertarianism/
THE EVOLUTION OF PARASITISM AND SUPPRESSION
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/07/20/law-exists-but-must-be-found-government-cannot-construct-it/
THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION OF FREE RIDING
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/
THE EFFECT OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/06/23/the-meaning-of-incremental-suppression/
THE SHIFT IN PARASITISM TO DECEIT
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/05/19/to-nassim-taleb-re-decline-in-violence-is-not-decline-in-parasitism/
THE ONLY MEANS OF ELIMINATING A PARASITIC STATE IS ELIMINATING DEMAND FOR IT
http://www.propertarianism.com/2015/04/23/the-only-means-of-eliminating-the-state-and-constructing-liberty/
Source date (UTC): 2015-07-24 07:27:00 UTC