Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Philosophy Before, and After, Propertarianism

    [S]trict construction merely makes it very hard to err, bias, and deceive: it’s a process of falsification.  A test.  What survives the test is a truth candidate.

    I’m not arrogant when I say that there is one category of philosophy prior to Propertarianism, and on category of philosophy after. Justificationism is now dead if it wasn’t dead becasue of Popper.

    And the reason I’m merging philosophy with science, and destroying rationalism is simple: philosophy has been used largely to lie.

    End Lying Into The Commons.

  • Philosophy Before, and After, Propertarianism

    [S]trict construction merely makes it very hard to err, bias, and deceive: it’s a process of falsification.  A test.  What survives the test is a truth candidate.

    I’m not arrogant when I say that there is one category of philosophy prior to Propertarianism, and on category of philosophy after. Justificationism is now dead if it wasn’t dead becasue of Popper.

    And the reason I’m merging philosophy with science, and destroying rationalism is simple: philosophy has been used largely to lie.

    End Lying Into The Commons.

  • Aristocracy is Good For Every Tribe.

    [A]ristocracy is good for every tribe. Every single one. So, I don’t do racism. I don’t want to complain about others. I want to defend against bad tribes. So I just don’t sacrifice for other tribes. Only my own. I love my tribe. Every lunatic one of us.  I will cooperate with other tribes, by not preying upon them.  But I will not sacrifice my tribe for others. COOPERATION AND PARASITISM ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY Agreeing not to prey upon you is different from subsidising you. To cooperate requires I do not prey upon you. Using the State for purposes of transferring from me against my will to you is just predation. So if you will use the state for predation upon my family then in turn I am free to prey upon you and yours. So the only choice is mutual non-predation.

  • Aristocracy is Good For Every Tribe.

    [A]ristocracy is good for every tribe. Every single one. So, I don’t do racism. I don’t want to complain about others. I want to defend against bad tribes. So I just don’t sacrifice for other tribes. Only my own. I love my tribe. Every lunatic one of us.  I will cooperate with other tribes, by not preying upon them.  But I will not sacrifice my tribe for others. COOPERATION AND PARASITISM ARE LOGICALLY CONTRADICTORY Agreeing not to prey upon you is different from subsidising you. To cooperate requires I do not prey upon you. Using the State for purposes of transferring from me against my will to you is just predation. So if you will use the state for predation upon my family then in turn I am free to prey upon you and yours. So the only choice is mutual non-predation.

  • A (Very) Short Course In Decidability.

    (learning propertarianism)

    [W]hat does Decidable mean?

    REVERSE: In logic we state that a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present within the system (ie: is decidable).

    OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).

    Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable.

    This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm).  

  • A (Very) Short Course In Decidability.

    (learning propertarianism)

    [W]hat does Decidable mean?

    REVERSE: In logic we state that a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if the sufficient information for the decision is present within the system (ie: is decidable).

    OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).

    Or in simple terms, if DISCRETION is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable.

    This separates reason (or calculation in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm).  

  • CALCULABLE, RATIONAL, IRRATIONAL, ARATIONAL and “BLACK BOX” (draft) (learning pr

    CALCULABLE, RATIONAL, IRRATIONAL, ARATIONAL and “BLACK BOX”

    (draft) (learning propertarianism)

    DEFINITIONS:

    CALCULATIVE (HYPOTHETICAL) vs COMPUTATIONAL(DETERMINISTIC) – A process is CALCULATIVE if human beings are required to perform it, and COMPUTATIONAL if (current) computers can perform it.

    CALCULATIVE INSTITUTIONS – The set of technologies that permit human beings to extend their perception and comparison ability, and therefore their ability to understand and forecast in complexity, particularly a division of knowledge and labor, as a means of assisting in planning, forecasting, production and decision making. Specifically: numbers, counting, arithmetic, accounting, algebra, calculus, statistics, combined with money, numeric time, banking, interest, contract, rule of law, combined with narrative, history, objective truth, combined with property, exchange, trade, markets.

    CALCULATION / CALCULATIVE: A calculation is a deliberate process for transforming one or more inputs into one or more results, with variable change. The term is generally used to describe a spectrum of methods of reasoning, from the very definite arithmetical calculation of using an algorithm, to the vague heuristics of calculating a strategy in a competition or calculating the chance of a successful relationship between two people.

    OPERATIONAL: A recipe for a description of a series of actions that produce a result within a limit of precision. (an existence proof)

    COMPUTATIONAL: A sequence of mechanically producible and repeatable operations.

    LOGICAL – A sequence of operations Not entirely a synonym for rational, since logical statements should be formally testable, while rational statements nearly need not be irrational.

    RATIONAL – Reasonable. Reasoned. A conclusion achieved through the process of reason. Drawing hypotheses from juxtaposing facts against each other and determining their relations. Does not imply that the answer is correct. Only that logic was reasoning was properly applied.

    IRRATIONAL – Not reasonable. Not correctly reasoned. In philosophical usage, means illogical, or poor reasoning. Specifically that the reasoning applied or decision made, does not result in the desired ends.

    ARATIONAL – Having no rational characteristics; having no capacity to reason. In philosophy, not within the domain of what can be understood or analyzed by reason; outside the competence of the rules of reason.

    ARATIONAL BLACK BOX – I use the terms “Black Box” and “Arational” to refer to non-logical content that produces beneficial ends. The problem with all religions other than perhaps stoicism and Buddhism, is that their resulting strategy differs from their claimed mythology. Christianity for example is a set of myths and ideals the purpose of which is to encourage if not force the extension of kinship love to non-kin, and by consequence, produce a high trust society.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-30 15:42:00 UTC

  • #tcot #tlot Strict construction merely makes it very hard to err, bias, and dece

    #tcot #tlot Strict construction merely makes it very hard to err, bias, and deceive: it’s falsification. What remains is a truth candidate.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-30 10:05:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/626695006292717568

  • #tcot #tlot I’m not arrogant when I say that there is all philosophy prior to Pr

    #tcot #tlot I’m not arrogant when I say that there is all philosophy prior to Propertarianism, and all after. Justificationism is now dead.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-30 10:03:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/626694489520926720

  • #tcot #tlot The reason I’m merging philosophy with science, and destroying ratio

    #tcot #tlot The reason I’m merging philosophy with science, and destroying rationalism is simple: philosophy has been used largely to lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-07-30 10:01:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/626694123626622976