Author: Curt Doolittle

  • THE REFORMATION [C]hristianity: the gradual expiration of impulsive hatred and i

    THE REFORMATION

    [C]hristianity: the gradual expiration of impulsive hatred and its replacement with rational justice.

    QUESTION: What if the New Testament was our Old Testament and the ‘New’ the Western ethical cannon?

    MAN

    – God (Truth).

    – Gods (perfection in individual virtues).

    – Those humans who were godlike (demonstrated perfection in life).

    – Those humans who worked to be godlike. (but whose names we do not always remember)

    – Those humans who refrained from being ungodly.

    – Those humans who were ungodly.

    – And those humans who were evil.

    GODS

    – Center: God (perfection), Man, Woman, Earth. (Family + earth)

    – North: Truth, Law, Justice, (War. Masculine)

    – East: Contract, Production, Distribution, Trade

    – West: Art, Invention, Knowledge, Craft

    – South: Love, Caretaking, Nurture, Charity (Feminine)

    NOT ONE BUT MANY

    – Monotheism is the folly of conformity to tyranny: that we must be identical slaves, rather than specialists who participate in a division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy and inform one another through voluntary cooperation.

    – Pick your saint and seek to live as your saint.

    – The religion of specialists for an economy of specialists in a heterogeneous polity.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 11:12:00 UTC

  • Q&A: IS CHRISTIANITY DECEITFUL? QUESTION: “Curt, could you expand upon this? I’v

    Q&A: IS CHRISTIANITY DECEITFUL?

    QUESTION:

    “Curt, could you expand upon this? I’ve often heard you make multiple positive references to Christianity, yet still find it to be deceitful? Forgive me if I’m misunderstanding you.”

    —“This is the greatest legal deception in human history third only to the forcible introduction of Christianity, and the universal deceit of scriptural monotheism.”—

    ANSWER:

    Have you ever been graded on a paper in English class where you get separate grades for content and form? Well, lets try to think of mythology as form(method of argument), content(the narrative or explanation), implied content (metaphysical contend), the intended consequences, and the unintended consequences produced by it.

    If you were to create a school, and a body of law, the first principle of which was to unify a people by promoting the extension of kinship love to non kin, training teachers (priests) and legitimizing (crowning) rulers who held to this principle, I would say that would be a truthful religion. It would also be equal in metaphysical content to christianity, and produce similar results: it increases trust and cooperation and economic velocity.

    So “love one another” is a pretty good message. Now if you had added that message(ethical philosophy) to stoicism(personal philosophy), and aristotelianism(political philosophy), I think you would have had the world’s best possible religion. But we didn’t. They didn’t. They lied instead.

    My criticism of christianity is that it’s a good idea wrapped in lies. And that those lies are in no small part responsible for a thousand years of ignorance forcibly extended by the government and the church as a means of bringing submissive mysticism to europa now that the expense of governing the territory had become impossible by military, economic, and judicial means.

    The bible isn’t an heroic document. It’s the story of the rise and fall of judea because of the failure of their god and their religion to convert them from immoral herders and merchants to a martial people capable of holding land and farms. If compared to the same greek works of the time it is the equivalent of comparing today’s science to islamic mysticism – even witchcraft. It’s absurd.

    Christianity was a mental plague that nearly destroyed us, and we were only rescued a thousand years later by the rediscovery of our greek and therefore indo-european method of thought.

    If truth is the secret of the west, and christianity is a lie, then how can it be ‘good’?

    What is ‘good’ about the west was there before the church. The church amplified what was there. but that’s all. And the price of that amplification was a devolution in to mysticism and ignorance we still struggle to climb out of.

    So as an institution of government as a creator of law and as an advocate of love the church was good. As a distributor and imposer of lies, it was harmful.

    What might have happened if instead of closing the stoic schools and imposing christianity Justinian had done the opposite?

    What if the Romanticists in the victorian era in Germany had succeeded in restoring paganism and naturalism?

    What if today we could escape the lies, the lies that are created from those lies (puritanism, neo-puritanism, socialism, postmodernism, and feminism) and instead saturated our people in truth rather than lies?

    What if we made lying into the commons illegal? What if we made polluting the commons with lies and untruths illegal, and punishable?

    So I appreciate the law and order of the church as an institution but I curse it forever, and justinian in particular, and kant, marx, muhammed, jesus, abraham and zoroaster for the most evil lies that have ever been constructed by man. Confucius merely failed. Buddha tried to kill off mysticism and was corrupted by later generations. Aristotle persists thankfully, as the greatest philosopher in history, despite the near total loss of his works. But ALL the rest are just liars. Incompetents who could not find a solution to the problem of politics without lying. For expedience due to incompetence they lied. Lying works if there is enough of it. And religion creates enough of it.

    We are the people who invented and speak the truth, and we have dragged humanity out of ignorance and poverty in both the ancient and modern worlds. We were conquered by lies in the first to third centuries using the availability of writing and travel. The same people, using the same strategy are attempting to conquer us with a new series of pseudoscientific and pseudo-rational lies using modern technology and media. The second conquest of lies has been in progress for coming up on two centuries.

    A thing need not be all good or all bad unless you claim omniscience and authority. The church is no authority – It is neither all good nor all bad. Christianity is no authority – it is neither all good or all bad. The central proposition of Christianity is to love one another – to increase trust cooperation and prosperity by the expurgation of evil from the heart of man.

    But if the truth cannot be stated truthfully, then it too is only partly good and partly bad. And our future is then partly good and partly bad – and we are left without fulfilling our potential.

    Love is enough. Truth is enough. Non-parasitism is enough. The common law is enough. Voluntary organization of production is enough. And the voluntary construction of commons by the surviving of dissent is enough.

    NO MORE LIES. TRUTH IS ENOUGH.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 10:35:00 UTC

  • That’s what progressives and postmoderns do, right? Lie? Reality by chanting? Tr

    That’s what progressives and postmoderns do, right? Lie? Reality by chanting? Truth is truth. Lying is lying. Stop lying.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 10:32:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629238553625657344

    Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629238333135290368


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @AppleCiderRadio Science and truthful speech require that we categorize, contrast, value. Reality hurts? Sorry, but that’s no reason to lie.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/629238333135290368


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @AppleCiderRadio Science and truthful speech require that we categorize, contrast, value. Reality hurts? Sorry, but that’s no reason to lie.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/629238333135290368

  • Science and truthful speech require that we categorize, contrast, value. Reality

    Science and truthful speech require that we categorize, contrast, value. Reality hurts? Sorry, but that’s no reason to lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 10:31:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629238333135290368

    Reply addressees: @AppleCiderRadio

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629107849881190401


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629107849881190401

  • The Third World has Weaponized Reproduction. And they’re winning the war

    The Third World has Weaponized Reproduction. And they’re winning the war.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 08:27:00 UTC

  • DEAR NEWBIES: WELCOME TO THE REVOLUTION. (important!) I do my work in public, li

    DEAR NEWBIES: WELCOME TO THE REVOLUTION.

    (important!)

    I do my work in public, like a medieval street merchant. You get to see the product being made. Including its successes and failures. It’s been an interesting experience for both me and those who follow me. But it’s an investment of time and effort for those who follow me.

    My work is radical. It is a radical reformation of truth, epistemology, ethics, politics and aesthetics and as broad an effort as Kant(rationalism), Marx(pseudoscience) and equalled only in recent scope by Heidegger(pseudorationalism) – all of whom were on the opposite end of the spectrum. It is a continuation of the Locke/Smith/Hume revolution, and a refutation of the Kant/Marx/Heidegger counter-revolution’s revolt against science (truth).

    Trying to follow or understand my work is non-trivial. I place a great deal of burden on the audience for knowledge of physical science, economics, and philosophy. On my website is a ‘short list’ of books that I try to keep current that should allow someone with a university education in an empirical discipline to gain a basic scientific knowledge necessary to understand propertarianism. But even reading those works will take time.

    And, even if you possess the underlying knowledge, my program is RADICAL, and that means novel, and somewhat hard to learn:

    1 – Testimonial truth and Testimonialism are themselves a profound innovation that unifies science, philosophy, morality and law. Propertarianism unifies biology, cooperation(economics, ethics, morality), and law.

    2 – Propertarian institutions are a radical reformation of classical liberalism that articulates how and why the classical liberal model failed: failing to create new houses for newly enfranchised classes with competing reproductive interests, and the conflation of law with contract.

    3 – Propertarian ethics invalidate democratic assent, replacing it with legal criticism, meaning that any political contract that is not illegal may pass, and other groups may prohibit it only if it fails the legal prohibition on involuntary transfer – thus eliminating monopoly rule under democracy, and converting the legislative branch to a market for the production of commons.

    4 – The Propertarian reformation of law completes the failed american constitutional program by requiring strict construction equal to that of mathematical proofs, thereby eliminating legal activism, parasitism, and providing universal decidability to matters of law, reducing the court’s function to determination of truth telling, and responsibility for causal relations.

    Propertarianism provides the missing logic of cooperation that has caused the artificial separation between science, philosophy, and law for 2500 years. This has stumped great minds for over two millennia. I am just a lucky man, standing on the shoulders of giants, peering into history, and by accident at the right point in time; and I see the errors of the past only because I am keenly aware of the failure of the 20th century philosophers, the success of operational thinking we call 20th century computer science, and the recent innovations in genetic, biological, cognitive, behavioral sciences since Pinker fired the first volley.

    If this problem stumped so many greater minds than mine, it is no wonder that it’s hard for some of you to grasp the scope of the revolution in intellectual history.

    There will always be passionate activists and those heavily invested in dogma that will hold desperately to their priors and criticize innovations that they do not understand. This is natural human conservatism regardless of which point of the political and moral compass they originate from. And it is very hard to ask passionate people who are heavily invested in comforting justificationary priors to spend a great deal of effort in learning a radical program that requires substantial effort and knowledge to understand and apply. Those people may possess the ability, not possess the ability, have the time and effort, or not have the time and effort, be willing to invest, or not willing to invest.

    So the only means of demonstrating to them that they should or must invest in learning such a thing, is for those who choose to make that investment for whatever reason, by their arguments and by their numbers, provide evidence that they should do so.

    That is where you come in.

    Propertarianism is the antidote to Marxism, Pseudoscience, Postmodernism and Deceit. It is the correction and completion of the classical liberal project, which is itself an expansion of the anglo saxon franchise, and in turn an expansion of the european and indo-european project: the heroic and truthful society. Where the greatest heroism is the costly burden of truth telling and personal sovereignty.

    If there is any end of history, it is not marxist socialism, or democratic secular humanism, but the truthful society made possible by the reformation of classical liberalism to facilitate cooperation between heterogeneous peoples while prohibiting every possible means of parasitism, and demanding productive efforts in order to survive. By prohibiting all parasitism we leave only productive voluntary exchange as a means of survival.

    So it may indeed be work to follow me on this journey. But buy doing so you are participating in the greatest revolution since Marxism, and together we are constructing the only means I have found for the restoration and perpetuation of western civilization: the people who speak the truth, and the vast benefits that we westerners bring to mankind by having spoken the truth; despite the terrible difficulty in learning how to speak truthfully, and the enormous cost of truthful speech that each of us pays every day, as the most important tax, so that with truth telling that we have used in both the ancient and modern eras, to drag humanity kicking and screaming against its will, out of illness and disease, malthusian poverty, constant conflict, universal ignorance and crippling mysticism.

    Liberty in our lifetimes.

    Welcome to the revolution.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 07:40:00 UTC

  • (I love working to new age music without lyrics. It’s like flying while dreaming

    (I love working to new age music without lyrics. It’s like flying while dreaming.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 06:54:00 UTC

  • AS REACTIONS TO VARIOUS FORMS OF ACQUISITION OR LOSS If you try to catalog emoti

    http://robinnixon.com/…/uploads/2011/10/Plutchik.pngEMOTIONS AS REACTIONS TO VARIOUS FORMS OF ACQUISITION OR LOSS

    If you try to catalog emotions (experiences), that’s been done. (see http://robinnixon.com/…/uploads/2011/10/Plutchik.png).

    If you want to map those emotions to physical drives that’s been done (dominance/submission, excitement-acquisition/rest-conservation, pleasure/pain, arousal-attraction/rejection-disgust) (I can’t remember the author at this moment)

    If you want to map morality I think that’s been done (haidt- moral foundations)

    If you want to map morality to property (acquisitiveness) I’ve done that: (http://www.propertarianism.com/…/moral-foundations-as…/ )

    The open question is how to transform the full set of rich emotions into propertarian statements and therefore connect them with reproductive necessity (or utility).

    I haven’t gone through them all but it’s not that difficult to restructure the graphic. (I just honestly have to be in the mood to do it.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 06:27:00 UTC

  • “Not only is God Great, but Greatness is Godliness.”

    –“Not only is God Great, but Greatness is Godliness.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 05:13:00 UTC

  • COMPLAINT VS ADVOCACY Knowing what’s tragic about our current postmodern era, is

    COMPLAINT VS ADVOCACY

    Knowing what’s tragic about our current postmodern era, is not the same as knowing what was exceptional about the the modern, medieval, and ancient eras.

    #NRx


    Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 05:02:00 UTC