THE UNIFICATION OF MORALITY, PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE, AND LAW
1) Testimonialism (Epistemology),
2) Propertarianism(Ethics), and;
3) Strict-Construction Dissent Liberalism: the multi-house market for the production of commons(Politics).
(I am trying to figure out a name for propertarian and testimonial Politics)
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-07 02:43:00 UTC
RUSSIA CAN LIMIT, IT CANNOT LEAD.
Circumpolar people.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-07 00:24:00 UTC
PROPERTY ABSOLUTISM IS IMMORAL
(important)
Property-Absolutism violates the truth test of Full Accounting under Testimonialism; whereas the Non-Imposition of Costs does not. As such Property-Absolutism in Cosmopolitan Libertinism is a falsehood: a deceit for the purposes of theft, that forces retaliation, and violates the prohibition on the imposition of costs that makes rational cooperation preferable to predation.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 23:58:00 UTC
PROPERTY IS NOT AN ABSOLUTE – THE IMPOSITION OF COSTS IS.
(important concept) (learning propertariansm)
The informational content of Property Rights is less than the informational content of the Prohibition on the Imposition of Costs Upon the Property-en-toto of Others.
Property Rights are not an epistemological or decidable absolute in Propertarianism, but the positive assertion of the negative prohibition of the imposition of costs.
One possesses rights to restitution for violations of property en toto not to the property itself, which one need no ‘right’ to – one need only acquire it without imposing costs upon others that both generate the demand to retaliate, and that violates the incentive to cooperate, and therefore is merely a moral consideration.
So:
– property exists prior to cooperation,
– morality preserves cooperation, by prohibitions and positive assertions (advice)
– law records both positive morality and negative on immorality
– law records positive property rights and methods of restitution (or punishment).
Property is not an absolute. The imposition of costs is. Property rights are constrained by the reality of temporal existence, and the prohibition on the imposition of costs upon others.
The model is that if your store of grain exists during an era of crisis, that you may not use the opportunity to either determine who lives or dies, or to profit from suffering of others. It means that one sells the grain to them at prices that prevent your loss (an imposition of costs upon you).
It means that in the example of the value of water in a desert, you will ensure that the sale of water to a dying man is not an imposition of costs, but not a means of increasing profits. It means that if he lacks the money to pay, that you must give him water now, as long as he commits to paying, and that you are due damages from him if you must collect.
Profit from suffering violates the principle of productive exchange and the avoidance of retaliation.
This fact amounts to a ‘shall-issue service to my kith and kin’, and that I shall seek profit only from mutually productive exchange, and not that I shall maximize profits in all circumstances.
It means that one does not take opportunistic profits from the suffering of others without alternative.
This fact separates the aristocracy of Propertarianism from the Libertinism of cosmopolitan libertarianism.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 23:53:00 UTC
Knowledge: Knowing what’s tragic about our current postmodern era, is not the same as knowing what was exceptional about the the modern, medieval, and ancient eras. The Incremental Suppression of Predation: Requires Property-en-toto, The Common law, Rule of Law, Universal Standing in matters of the commons, and an independent and professional Judiciary. Rule of Law: Governments cannot make law, only contracts within the law. All else is not Law, but dictate (command). The Art of Predation: Murder, Violence, Theft, Fraud, Extortion, Externalization, Free-Riding, Conspiracy, Displacement, and Conquest. The Era Of Deceit: The 20th Century will be remembered in intellectual history as an era of mysticism, pseudoscience, innumeracy, propaganda and deceit. The Left’s Program of Deceit: The only reason the left could complete its program of deceit was because we failed to protect the informational commons. Tragedy at each compass point: Progressive lying and theft, conservative ignorance and stupidity, and libertarian cluelessness. Tactics Must Remain Moral: We can morally adopt some of the tactics of the left (shaming). But we cannot adopt their lying The Lie of Non-Violence: There is nothing untrue, dishonest, and immoral in the application of violence for the purpose of restitution. Just the opposite. The Lie of Appeasement: Appeasement of competitors is merely taking a present discount at future cost to your civilization. It’s just theft. It’s deceitful. It’s immoral. Liar The Lie of Conviction: The difference between convenience and conviction is whether you obtain a discount or pay a cost. Anything else is just excuse. The Lie of Tolerance: You’re not showing tolerance. You’re failing to pay the high cost of defense. It is what it is. Liar. The Lie of Democracy: Democracy can choose between priorities in matters of equal interest, but not in matters of competing interest. That’s just majority tyranny, not choice. The Lie of Assent: Like democracy assent is dishonest. The honest question is whether any dissent is moral. Otherwise assent is just creating an mandatory opportunity for rent seeking. The Lie of Equality: Not only are we unequal in ability and interest, but male and female reproductive strategies while compatible are in conflict, and the classes while compatible are in competition. To state we are equal in ability or interest is simply a lie to justify the tyranny of majoritarianism, and by consequence parasitic and dysgenic proletarian rule to maintain a parasitic and entrenched and unaccountable monopoly bureaucracy. The Lie of Conflating individual Law and Familial Commons: The law (a negative) must be constructed for individuals because only individuals can act parasitically, the commons (a positive ) must be constructed for families because only families can reproduce. All else is mere parasitism off future generations. The Lie of Intergenerational Parasitism (rather than Intergenerational Cooperation): The Lie of Economic Innumeracy: — The Lie of Laundering and Pooling: — The Lie of Rallying and Shaming: — and many more…
Knowledge: Knowing what’s tragic about our current postmodern era, is not the same as knowing what was exceptional about the the modern, medieval, and ancient eras. The Incremental Suppression of Predation: Requires Property-en-toto, The Common law, Rule of Law, Universal Standing in matters of the commons, and an independent and professional Judiciary. Rule of Law: Governments cannot make law, only contracts within the law. All else is not Law, but dictate (command). The Art of Predation: Murder, Violence, Theft, Fraud, Extortion, Externalization, Free-Riding, Conspiracy, Displacement, and Conquest. The Era Of Deceit: The 20th Century will be remembered in intellectual history as an era of mysticism, pseudoscience, innumeracy, propaganda and deceit. The Left’s Program of Deceit: The only reason the left could complete its program of deceit was because we failed to protect the informational commons. Tragedy at each compass point: Progressive lying and theft, conservative ignorance and stupidity, and libertarian cluelessness. Tactics Must Remain Moral: We can morally adopt some of the tactics of the left (shaming). But we cannot adopt their lying The Lie of Non-Violence: There is nothing untrue, dishonest, and immoral in the application of violence for the purpose of restitution. Just the opposite. The Lie of Appeasement: Appeasement of competitors is merely taking a present discount at future cost to your civilization. It’s just theft. It’s deceitful. It’s immoral. Liar The Lie of Conviction: The difference between convenience and conviction is whether you obtain a discount or pay a cost. Anything else is just excuse. The Lie of Tolerance: You’re not showing tolerance. You’re failing to pay the high cost of defense. It is what it is. Liar. The Lie of Democracy: Democracy can choose between priorities in matters of equal interest, but not in matters of competing interest. That’s just majority tyranny, not choice. The Lie of Assent: Like democracy assent is dishonest. The honest question is whether any dissent is moral. Otherwise assent is just creating an mandatory opportunity for rent seeking. The Lie of Equality: Not only are we unequal in ability and interest, but male and female reproductive strategies while compatible are in conflict, and the classes while compatible are in competition. To state we are equal in ability or interest is simply a lie to justify the tyranny of majoritarianism, and by consequence parasitic and dysgenic proletarian rule to maintain a parasitic and entrenched and unaccountable monopoly bureaucracy. The Lie of Conflating individual Law and Familial Commons: The law (a negative) must be constructed for individuals because only individuals can act parasitically, the commons (a positive ) must be constructed for families because only families can reproduce. All else is mere parasitism off future generations. The Lie of Intergenerational Parasitism (rather than Intergenerational Cooperation): The Lie of Economic Innumeracy: — The Lie of Laundering and Pooling: — The Lie of Rallying and Shaming: — and many more…
Correct. Love Rocks! It’s great for everyone.
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 16:42:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629331666578898944
Reply addressees: @IT_Reactionary @Nick_B_Steves @SurvivingBabel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629328390005370880
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629328390005370880
I’m also a catholic. Where do you think idealists come from? The church! 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 16:27:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629328028783538176
Reply addressees: @IT_Reactionary @ascendingtower @Nick_B_Steves @SurvivingBabel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629327421750296577
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629327421750296577
I’m easy. A sucker for punishment. Put my name in the hat. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 16:26:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629327727540178944
Reply addressees: @IT_Reactionary @ascendingtower @Nick_B_Steves @SurvivingBabel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629327480139186177
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629327480139186177
I dunno if I’m smart enough to know what a sparse matrix is. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-06 16:25:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629327559910682624
Reply addressees: @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629259022038732800
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/629259022038732800