Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Down the rabbit hole we go

    Down the rabbit hole we go…..


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-04 15:44:00 UTC

  • (Stomping on Reddit Bunnies is really not worth my time, but sometimes we have t

    (Stomping on Reddit Bunnies is really not worth my time, but sometimes we have to pay the high cost of maintaining a sanitary debate environment.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-04 14:43:00 UTC

  • I Am Trying To Repair The Enlightenment

    [C]OMPARISONS:
    1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pseudoscientific (belief) Libertinism
    vs European Universalist Empirical (Legal) Libertarianism.

    2) Ashkenazi Neo Conservatism (Make the world safe for separatists)
    vs Anglo Burkeian Conservatism ( Parent the world into prosperity).

    3) Ashkenazi (Pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Communism
    vs Anglo-German (pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Secular Humanism.

    METHODS:
    1) Anglo American (critical) Empirical (Law).
    2) German (justificationary) Rationalism (Philosophy).
    3) French (subjectivist) Moralism (literature).
    3) Ashkenazi (overloading) pseudo-moralism, pseudo-scientism, pseudo-rationalism (Pseudoscience)

    All cultures tried to universalize their sectarian ideologies as rational and scientific platforms. Yet these different group evolutionary strategies all failed the test of universalism. The anglos were right in method (science) and wrong in vision of man (aristocracy of everyone). The germans were wrong in method (kantian rationalism) and right in vision of man (paternal hierarchy).

    The Ashkenazis were at best hermeneutic, and at worst deceitful (separatism without paying costs of commons) and pragmatic by creating a new ‘religion’ – a new means of suggestion by loading,framing and overloading; thereby taking advantage of western high trust and pathological altruism.

    Through this rather broader lens, we see that all the enlightenments failed. (I don’t address the french because no one takes them seriously). We see that the last century was plagued by lies, pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and justification, and as Hayek warned us, was a century of mysticism (which was the best word he could come up with at the time.)

    That is why I am aggressively anti-ancap: because I see it as another great lie that has been propagandized upon my people, and has misdirected their energies and aspirations away from the only possible source of liberty: the prohibition on parasitism, the common law, universal standing, every man a sheriff, and universal militia. There is no state and no ruler if we rule by law.

    So where the person looking at leaves sees minor errors in the ancap-libertines, and where the person looking at trees sees a set of competing ideologies, I look at the forest and see group evolutionary strategies covering a spectrum from anglo empirical and legal ‘truth’, to german justification (kant and the german idealists), to french pretense of reason(Rousseau), to ashkenazi systemic deception: Freud, Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt-School, Rothbard. The second great deception (authoritarian pseudoscience) duplicating what was done to rome by abraham, jesus, peter and paul: the first great deception: authoritarian monotheism.

    That explains why I am hostile to well intentioned fools.

    Because they’re part of the problem: useful idiots of the libertine rather than communist and neo-conservative types.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

  • I Am Trying To Repair The Enlightenment

    [C]OMPARISONS:
    1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pseudoscientific (belief) Libertinism
    vs European Universalist Empirical (Legal) Libertarianism.

    2) Ashkenazi Neo Conservatism (Make the world safe for separatists)
    vs Anglo Burkeian Conservatism ( Parent the world into prosperity).

    3) Ashkenazi (Pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Communism
    vs Anglo-German (pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Secular Humanism.

    METHODS:
    1) Anglo American (critical) Empirical (Law).
    2) German (justificationary) Rationalism (Philosophy).
    3) French (subjectivist) Moralism (literature).
    3) Ashkenazi (overloading) pseudo-moralism, pseudo-scientism, pseudo-rationalism (Pseudoscience)

    All cultures tried to universalize their sectarian ideologies as rational and scientific platforms. Yet these different group evolutionary strategies all failed the test of universalism. The anglos were right in method (science) and wrong in vision of man (aristocracy of everyone). The germans were wrong in method (kantian rationalism) and right in vision of man (paternal hierarchy).

    The Ashkenazis were at best hermeneutic, and at worst deceitful (separatism without paying costs of commons) and pragmatic by creating a new ‘religion’ – a new means of suggestion by loading,framing and overloading; thereby taking advantage of western high trust and pathological altruism.

    Through this rather broader lens, we see that all the enlightenments failed. (I don’t address the french because no one takes them seriously). We see that the last century was plagued by lies, pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and justification, and as Hayek warned us, was a century of mysticism (which was the best word he could come up with at the time.)

    That is why I am aggressively anti-ancap: because I see it as another great lie that has been propagandized upon my people, and has misdirected their energies and aspirations away from the only possible source of liberty: the prohibition on parasitism, the common law, universal standing, every man a sheriff, and universal militia. There is no state and no ruler if we rule by law.

    So where the person looking at leaves sees minor errors in the ancap-libertines, and where the person looking at trees sees a set of competing ideologies, I look at the forest and see group evolutionary strategies covering a spectrum from anglo empirical and legal ‘truth’, to german justification (kant and the german idealists), to french pretense of reason(Rousseau), to ashkenazi systemic deception: Freud, Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt-School, Rothbard. The second great deception (authoritarian pseudoscience) duplicating what was done to rome by abraham, jesus, peter and paul: the first great deception: authoritarian monotheism.

    That explains why I am hostile to well intentioned fools.

    Because they’re part of the problem: useful idiots of the libertine rather than communist and neo-conservative types.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

  • Excellent! Thank you for this!

    Excellent! Thank you for this!


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 12:09:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/639409818718093312

    Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/639372572908388352


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/639372572908388352

  • British Universalism: Locke, Hume, Smith, then Burke Conquered the world with Sh

    British Universalism: Locke, Hume, Smith, then Burke

    Conquered the world with Ships, Cannon, Steel, Law, Accounting and Trade.

    Utopianism led to wealth.

    Conquered Germany and in doing so Europe.

    Left the american “children” holding the bag.

    Americans constrained communism by selling utopianism.

    That utopianism was suicide.

    The anglos have been fools.

    Under the excuse of not offending customers.

    Resulted in their suicide: conquest by their customers.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 09:01:00 UTC

  • THIS: SEE IT”S NOT JUST ME THAT SAYS ITS POSSIBLE… PAPER AT THIS URL

    http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/west-point-william-bradford/403009/READ THIS: SEE IT”S NOT JUST ME THAT SAYS ITS POSSIBLE…

    PAPER AT THIS URL:

    https://www.nslj.org/wp-content/uploads/3_NatlSecLJ_278-461_Bradford1.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 08:12:00 UTC

  • I AM TRYING TO REPAIR THE ENLIGHTENMENT COMPARISONS: 1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pse

    I AM TRYING TO REPAIR THE ENLIGHTENMENT

    COMPARISONS:

    1) Ashkenazi Separatist Pseudoscientific (belief) Libertinism

    vs European Universalists Empirical (Legal) Libertarianism.

    2) Ashkenazi Neo Conservatism (Make the world safe for separatists)

    vs Anglo Burkeian Conservatism ( Parent the world into prosperity).

    3) Ashkenazi (Pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Communism

    vs Anglo-German (pseudo-scientific/Pseudo-moral) Secular Humanism.

    METHODS:

    1) Anglo American (critical) Empirical (Law).

    2) German (justificationary) Rationalism (Philosophy).

    3) French (subjectivist) Moralism (literature).

    3) Ashkenazi (overloading) pseudo-moralism, pseudo-scientism, pseudo-rationalism (Pseudoscience)

    All cultures tried to universalize their sectarian ideologies as rational and scientific platforms. Yet these different group evolutionary strategies all failed the test of universalism. The anglos were right in method (science) and wrong in vision of man (aristocracy of everyone). The germans were wrong in method (kantian rationalism) and right in vision of man (paternal hierarchy).

    The Ashkenazis were at best hermeneutic, and at worst deceitful (separatism without paying costs of commons) and pragmatic by creating a new ‘religion’ – a new means of suggestion by loading,framing and overloading; thereby taking advantage of western high trust and pathological altruism.

    Through this rather broader lens, we see that all the enlightenments failed. (I don’t address the french because no one takes them seriously). We see that the last century was plagued by lies, pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and justification, and as Hayek warned us, was a century of mysticism (which was the best word he could come up with at the time.)

    That is why I am aggressively anti-ancap: because I see it as another great lie that has been propagandized upon my people, and has misdirected their energies and aspirations away from the only possible source of liberty: the prohibition on parasitism, the common law, universal standing, every man a sheriff, and universal militia. There is no state and no ruler if we rule by law.

    So where the person looking at leaves sees minor errors in the ancap-libertines, and where the person looking at trees sees a set of competing ideologies, I look at the forest and see group evolutionary strategies covering a spectrum from anglo empirical and legal ‘truth’, to german justification (kant and the german idealists), to french pretense of reason(Rousseau), to ashkenazi systemic deception: Freud, Boaz, Marx, Cantor, Mises, Frankfurt-School, Rothbard. The second great deception (authoritarian pseudoscience) duplicating what was done to rome by abraham, jesus, peter and paul: the first great deception: authoritarian monotheism.

    That explains why I am hostile to well intentioned fools.

    Because they’re part of the problem: useful idiots of the libertine rather than communist and neo-conservative types.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 08:04:00 UTC

  • THIS TODAY

    http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2015/09/russian-intrigue-deja-vu-all-over-again.htmlREAD THIS TODAY


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 06:35:00 UTC

  • LIBERTARIAN IMPLOSION (frontpage mag) Few Republican subgroups were harder hit b

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_full/public/uploads/2015/08/23_ridiculously_offensive_donald_trump_quotes_4060_5187.jpg?itok=fZE6RSDMTHE LIBERTARIAN IMPLOSION

    (frontpage mag)

    Few Republican subgroups were harder hit by the rise of Trump than libertarians. Not that long ago, the libertarian message had appeared to be equivalent to conservatism. But while small government and deregulation were appealing, the libertarian foreign policy agenda was a disaster. Their romance with the Russian agents of Wikileaks and Edward Snowden didn’t help matters any. Libertarians got Republicans to cheer for Rand Paul’s drone filibuster, but ranting about drones and the NSA stopped being a viable foreign policy when ISIS began releasing beheading videos.

    But the real problems were domestic.

    A genuine deregulation focus might have redeemed Congress, but instead it led to inside baseball battles, like the one over the Export-Import Bank which were quite significant to the donor class, but weren’t of much interest to the Republican base.

    The capper came when the Koch Bros and Norquist allied with Obama and the left to back a pro-crime agenda. Just as Americans became worried by rising crime, libertarians began campaigning on behalf of drug dealers.

    And they’re still at it.

    Non-ideological candidates like Trump and Carson stepped into an intellectual vacuum created when libertarians imploded and took chunk of the conservative movement with them.

    The split predated Trump. Few conservatives were enthusiastic about amnesty. Trump picked up an issue that had already become a wedge when Cruz and Walker embraced it, setting them against establishment types like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, but also hard core libertarians like Rand Paul, and Koch cronies like Paul Ryan and Rick Perry.

    Trump just expanded the split into a larger protectionist position that has libertarians impotently fuming. He picked up chunks of Perot’s message and picked up a Republican base that felt abandoned.

    The conservative collapse also killed the ideological purity test. But then the purity test had already stopped making sense. Libertarians are currently advocating for drug dealers and illegal alien amnesty. Some are pushing straightforward transnationalism and not on Reason, but in more mainstream conservative outlets. They define this as a “Liberty” agenda, but its appeal is extremely limited at best.

    And if ideological purity means drug dealers, illegal aliens and more jobs going to China, plenty of conservatives have decided they don’t want any part of it.

    Libertarians had their hour, but their embrace of dubious causes made them irrelevant. The movement needs to think hard about how to reengage conservatives again. But there’s no sign of that. Instead it’s pursuing its alliance with the left in support of freeing drug dealers… a program that has no possible positive outcome either for America or for them.

    If the libertarian movement is to reemerge, it needs to take a cue from Trump by thinking about what Americans want rather than about the tenets of their ideology. Because if Trump is successful, they are going to end up buried in the rubble.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 05:02:00 UTC