Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Define leadership? Do you mean persuasion? – Define Costs, do you mean depriving

    Define leadership? Do you mean persuasion? –
    Define Costs, do you mean depriving of rents? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 12:54:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/652104836637433856

    Reply addressees: @ne0colonial

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/651940634551562244


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/651940634551562244

  • Beautiful

    Beautiful.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 11:44:00 UTC

  • Q&A: WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY LOADING, FRAMING, AND OVERLOADING? —“Curt, you talk a

    Q&A: WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY LOADING, FRAMING, AND OVERLOADING?

    —“Curt, you talk about ‘loading and framing’ a lot. I have an idea of what you are talking about, but I’m wondering if you could provide a link to something to help me flesh out my understanding of the topic.”— Ed Hertzog

    Ed Hertzog:

    Great Question.

    -Framing:-

    There are a limited number of causal axis the mind can resolve into a consistent judgement without falling back on introspection – in other words, it is easy to overload our ability to reason with causal density.

    When we are overloaded by the frame, we abandon reason and resort to intuition – moral intuition.

    When we resort to moral intuition we resort to our metaphysical value judgements.

    This is a form of suggestion. Humans are very suggestible. Tremendously so. Do some research. Reason is limited. That’s why we had to invent math, logic, and science.

    (Hence why I constructed Testimonialism scientifically)

    -Loading-

    Loading is the art of attaching value judgements to facts. This is another form of suggestion. Because communication requires we use a sympathetic process, it is possible to use suggestion to load an argument with value judgements.

    (Hence why I constructed propertarianism amorally.)

    -Overloading-

    Saturating the discourse, or environment, with propaganda, or false-evidence. False propaganda is inexpensive under mass communication, and defeating fallacious arguments is expensive. We are subject to environmental suggestion.

    (Hence why I have outlawed unscientific political speech from the commons.)

    Protect the informational commons using the same rule of law we use to protect all other commons – including property rights themselves.

    You can research Chomsky and Lakoff (both masters of lying, which is why they understand the topic). But you will find that they seek to USE it rather than prohibit it. I do the opposite. Prohibit it. Fraud is fraud. No matter how elegant.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 10:41:00 UTC

  • altruism” #tcit #tlot #Nrx

    http://t.co/jbKfg7uvkc”Pathological altruism” #tcit #tlot #Nrx


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 09:28:00 UTC

  • (We all have mental self images. I still think of myself as the kid in the mirro

    (We all have mental self images. I still think of myself as the kid in the mirror when I was 19. And it’s still strange to me when people call me Mr Doolittle. I keep thinking their talking to my grandfather. Mom says I am peter pan. I never wanted to grow up. It seemed pointlessly difficult to be an adult. Maybe that’s why I wanted to earn fortunes: so I could be peter pan. Probably. ) 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 03:21:00 UTC

  • THE JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR REVOLUTION. As a philosopher I don’t have to fantasize

    THE JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR REVOLUTION.

    As a philosopher I don’t have to fantasize – I try to understand and describe causes. Propertarianism is descriptive.

    That is because, like all philosophers who bridge one era and the next, it is from decline and failure that we can determine our prior successes.

    From industrial decline we see medieval and ancient success.

    And then we describe and outlaw the evils of the prior era that caused us to lose our way.

    I will outlaw deceit – Anglo, German and Jewish.

    I will incrementally increase the suppression of new modes of parasitism.

    Western philosophy is expressed as law. Everything else is expressed as either religion or aesthetics.

    And with that increase in suppression of deceit, we will transform the world as greatly as the transformation from mysticism to moralism, moralism to rationalism, rationalism to science.

    Because we will render ethics and politics as science for the fist time in human history.

    If that isn’t a profound ambition sufficient to justify our revolution then I do not know what else could be.

    Curt Doolittle

    The philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 02:44:00 UTC

  • Do we build commons because of aesthetic bias? Because of status? As civic spiri

    Do we build commons because of aesthetic bias? Because of status? As civic spirituality? It is a tremendous advantage.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 02:27:00 UTC

  • TODAY’S INSIGHTS Just when you think you are done you hop in the shower and have

    TODAY’S INSIGHTS

    Just when you think you are done you hop in the shower and have two insights.

    1) add hazard: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange free of hazard and free of externality by the same criteria.

    2) My friend Josh has helped me understand that after Propertarianism and testimonialism, that all of philosophy is now a science – other than aesthetics, which is preference. And that this is the fallacy of the continentals: conflating aesthetic preferences with metaphysics, epistemology, ethics and politics.

    This, along with the understanding that the nazi movement was an aesthetic one helps me see what as an American I could not: the dominance of aesthetics in European thought. And the use of aesthetics as authoritarian persuasion. Which is enough of a topic that I must go research it.

    Because it’s profound.

    Beauty as cultural mandate.

    Brilliant.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-10-08 02:19:00 UTC

  • Ashkenazi Colonialism: Eastern Europe Had Anarchism – And the People Suffered Under Despotism

    [C]ontext: My objective is to falsify if not quash and destroy the Anglo, German, and Jewish Enlightenments, as deceptive, erroneous, and catastrophic failures to generalize group evolutionary strategies, so that I may explain the next step in our political evolution: to replace monopoly government (majority rule) with the combination of strictly constructed, objectively moral, universal, rule of law, with a political market for the voluntary production of commons wherein we replace majority assent with minority dissent only possible by legal means. Hence I attack the anglo equalitarian, german rationalist, and jewish pseudoscientific systems of thought. While science has invalidated the anglo over the past two decades, and propertarian philosophy has allowed me to invalidated the german because of the 20th century advances in the philosophy of science, it has taken me longer to understand why the jewish means of propaganda (deception) is so effective at deceiving the pathological altruism of western europeans. This post is another in the series on the origins of jewish propagandism (loading, framing, overloading and suggesting suicidal actions.) [M]y interest in anarchism evaporated after a few months of living in Ukraine. Because Eastern Europe is where the Cosmopolitan authors got their ideas – from practicing it. A minority managing and preying upon society through privatization of commons produced by conqueror’s military action, but not paid for by the managers themselves. In other words, Cosmopolitan Anarchism is a dishonest attempt to restore the predation of private ownership prosecuted by the Jews against eastern Europe under the protection of external military conquerors (austrian, lithiania, poland, muscovy). In more accurate terms: Ashkenazi Colonialism. Wherein an administrative class is effectively hired to parasitically manage a conquered people and territory. We see this pattern in Iraq, where the same people have formed the administrative (bureaucratic) layer for the Bathist regime. We saw this in Russia where the same people formed the ideological and administrative layer for the Soviets – and the slaughter of the people. We see this in america where the same people have formed the propaganda layer (previously the priesthood) in academy and media for the imperial and colonial american state, and the combined neo-puritain, socialist, libertine, and neo-conservative agendas. In his book “The Fatal Embrace” author “Benjamin Ginsburg” argues that the jews must end their ongoing strategy of allying with the state as a means of oppressing the people, because in every case it results in their exclusion or extermination. —“Thus, over the past several centuries, Jews have played important roles in the construction of absolutist, liberal, and socialist states as well as major parts in movements seeking to reform or supplant regimes to which they were unable to obtain access. Jews have traditionally offered their services to the state in exchange for the regime’s guarantee of security and opportunity. Ironically, however, precisely this relationship between Jews and the state has often sparked organized anti-Semitic attacks.”— (See: http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296652/) Anarchism is an ode to lost predation on the serfs of Eastern Europe just like James Bond is an ode to lost empire: they’re both fictions, and late twentieth century action movies are an ode to America’s lost moral high ground. “Voluntary-everything” is equivalent to Lawlessness. It is another great deception like Marxism and neoconservatism: a half truth preying upon the optimistic moral bias of western aristocratic egalitarians and their pathological altruism. Liberty, meaning the ability to do as you with without imposing costs upon others, is a product of the rule of law. And the only principle means of decidability for law that can possibly produce a condition of liberty is the prohibition on the imposition of costs, which we express as property rights, and the scope of those rights evolves in parallel to the evolution of the means of imposing costs that is the product of the expansion of technologies, methods of cooperation, and the division of labor. And we seek parasitism because it is much easier and more rewarding than production. So a few moral men rally to prohibit these parasitisms so that they and all can prosper. Those few men impose rule of law on an immoral population. These men constitute the western aristocracy. Rule of law. Nomocracy. The prohibition on the imposition of costs that result in free riding on the productivity of others. Aristocracy is the only source of liberty.

  • Ashkenazi Colonialism: Eastern Europe Had Anarchism – And the People Suffered Under Despotism

    [C]ontext: My objective is to falsify if not quash and destroy the Anglo, German, and Jewish Enlightenments, as deceptive, erroneous, and catastrophic failures to generalize group evolutionary strategies, so that I may explain the next step in our political evolution: to replace monopoly government (majority rule) with the combination of strictly constructed, objectively moral, universal, rule of law, with a political market for the voluntary production of commons wherein we replace majority assent with minority dissent only possible by legal means. Hence I attack the anglo equalitarian, german rationalist, and jewish pseudoscientific systems of thought. While science has invalidated the anglo over the past two decades, and propertarian philosophy has allowed me to invalidated the german because of the 20th century advances in the philosophy of science, it has taken me longer to understand why the jewish means of propaganda (deception) is so effective at deceiving the pathological altruism of western europeans. This post is another in the series on the origins of jewish propagandism (loading, framing, overloading and suggesting suicidal actions.) [M]y interest in anarchism evaporated after a few months of living in Ukraine. Because Eastern Europe is where the Cosmopolitan authors got their ideas – from practicing it. A minority managing and preying upon society through privatization of commons produced by conqueror’s military action, but not paid for by the managers themselves. In other words, Cosmopolitan Anarchism is a dishonest attempt to restore the predation of private ownership prosecuted by the Jews against eastern Europe under the protection of external military conquerors (austrian, lithiania, poland, muscovy). In more accurate terms: Ashkenazi Colonialism. Wherein an administrative class is effectively hired to parasitically manage a conquered people and territory. We see this pattern in Iraq, where the same people have formed the administrative (bureaucratic) layer for the Bathist regime. We saw this in Russia where the same people formed the ideological and administrative layer for the Soviets – and the slaughter of the people. We see this in america where the same people have formed the propaganda layer (previously the priesthood) in academy and media for the imperial and colonial american state, and the combined neo-puritain, socialist, libertine, and neo-conservative agendas. In his book “The Fatal Embrace” author “Benjamin Ginsburg” argues that the jews must end their ongoing strategy of allying with the state as a means of oppressing the people, because in every case it results in their exclusion or extermination. —“Thus, over the past several centuries, Jews have played important roles in the construction of absolutist, liberal, and socialist states as well as major parts in movements seeking to reform or supplant regimes to which they were unable to obtain access. Jews have traditionally offered their services to the state in exchange for the regime’s guarantee of security and opportunity. Ironically, however, precisely this relationship between Jews and the state has often sparked organized anti-Semitic attacks.”— (See: http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296652/) Anarchism is an ode to lost predation on the serfs of Eastern Europe just like James Bond is an ode to lost empire: they’re both fictions, and late twentieth century action movies are an ode to America’s lost moral high ground. “Voluntary-everything” is equivalent to Lawlessness. It is another great deception like Marxism and neoconservatism: a half truth preying upon the optimistic moral bias of western aristocratic egalitarians and their pathological altruism. Liberty, meaning the ability to do as you with without imposing costs upon others, is a product of the rule of law. And the only principle means of decidability for law that can possibly produce a condition of liberty is the prohibition on the imposition of costs, which we express as property rights, and the scope of those rights evolves in parallel to the evolution of the means of imposing costs that is the product of the expansion of technologies, methods of cooperation, and the division of labor. And we seek parasitism because it is much easier and more rewarding than production. So a few moral men rally to prohibit these parasitisms so that they and all can prosper. Those few men impose rule of law on an immoral population. These men constitute the western aristocracy. Rule of law. Nomocracy. The prohibition on the imposition of costs that result in free riding on the productivity of others. Aristocracy is the only source of liberty.