Interesting. https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1734347793769316638
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 16:13:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735332152244396067
https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1734347793769316638
Interesting. https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1734347793769316638
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 16:13:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735332152244396067
https://twitter.com/AutistocratMS/status/1734347793769316638
RT @dr_duchesne: Outrageous: A study entitled “Borderless Welfare State: The Consequences of Immigration on Public Finances” ———– s…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 16:13:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735332070413550002
—“Only about 20% of the left is ideologically committed. The rest of the people just want to be liked (not disliked). The ratio is the same on the right, except that we just want to be right, and by right meaning ‘take responsibility’.”— @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 15:12:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735316801699917852
STATE OF MEN’S MENTAL HEALTH – AND STOICISM
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FoZqzaqOcZ8
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 14:56:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735312779639214566
Darwinian calculation of evolutionary superiority (advantage) by adversarial competition. Meaning the lower half serves the purpose of incentivizing the upper alf what not to do more so than any other purpose.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 09:16:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735227231914402252
Reply addressees: @NWOBruh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735135261984477276
AFAIK, and I just searched the literaure, there is zero evidence that christianity affected rates of reproduction, and that reproduction was largely the result of economics, age of marriage, and rates of child mortality. Instead these religions focused the underclass on family…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 09:12:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735226345393701057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735135292477055410
RT @curtdoolittle: @CarmelloM @BOB37702515 @AutistocratMS FRENCH VS ANGLO CONSERVATISM
French conservatism and Anglo (British and American)…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 08:57:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735222389380665634
FRENCH VS ANGLO CONSERVATISM
French conservatism and Anglo (British and American) conservatism, while sharing some broad principles, differ significantly in their historical development, philosophical underpinnings, and practical applications. These differences reflect the distinct historical and cultural contexts of France, Britain, and the United States.
1. Historical Context:
French Conservatism: Emerged largely in response to the French Revolution and the upheaval it caused. Key figures like Joseph de Maistre and Charles Maurras emphasized order, tradition, and hierarchy. French conservatism often nostalgically looked back to the pre-revolutionary era, particularly the monarchy and the Catholic Church, as ideal models of social and political order.
Anglo Conservatism: In Britain, conservatism evolved as a reaction to the radicalism of the French Revolution but was less reactionary than French conservatism. Figures like Edmund Burke advocated for gradual change and respected traditional institutions and practices. In America, conservatism has been more closely tied to classical liberalism, emphasizing individual liberty, limited government, and free-market principles.
2. Philosophical Foundations:
French Conservatism: Tends to be more ideologically rigid, with a strong emphasis on cultural and religious traditions, social hierarchy, and a powerful state. It often incorporates a sense of romanticism and nostalgia for the past.
Anglo Conservatism: Generally pragmatic and skeptical of grand theories or ideologies. British conservatism values tradition but is also open to gradual, evolutionary change. American conservatism, while sharing these traits, places a greater emphasis on individualism and economic liberalism.
3. Attitudes Towards the State:
French Conservatism: Often advocates for a strong, central authority to maintain order and tradition. This aligns with a historical preference for monarchism or strong executive leadership.
Anglo Conservatism: In Britain, there is a balance between respect for strong institutions and skepticism towards concentrated power. In the U.S., conservatism traditionally supports a limited government, emphasizing personal freedom and market-driven solutions.
4. Economic Policies:
French Conservatism: Has been more open to state intervention in the economy and social welfare policies, reflecting a broader acceptance of state roles in managing society.
Anglo Conservatism: Especially in the U.S., there is a strong preference for free-market capitalism and minimal state intervention in the economy. British conservatism, while market-oriented, accepts a more significant role for the state in welfare and healthcare.
5. Social Policies:
French Conservatism: Often closely aligned with Catholic social teachings, emphasizing family, community, and moral order.
Anglo Conservatism: Tends to focus on individual responsibility and moral self-regulation, with a varying degree of emphasis on religious values depending on the context (more pronounced in the U.S.).
In summary, while both French and Anglo conservatisms value tradition and social order, French conservatism is more ideologically driven, with a romantic attachment to the past and a preference for strong state authority. Anglo conservatism, particularly in the British context, is more pragmatic and skeptical of concentrated power, balancing respect for tradition with an acceptance of gradual change. American conservatism combines these traits with a unique emphasis on individualism and economic
Or more simply:
—“It’s just Catholicism vs Empiricism. Joseph De Maistre vs Burke.”– @TabbyTeamster
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @CarmelloM @BOB37702515 @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 08:57:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735222362532966400
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735112106226397219
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-14 08:46:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735219608976490925
French Continental Liberalism is the OPPOSITE of Anglo American Classical Liberalism.
CurtD
Compare liberalism, in the french sense, vs classical liberalism in the british and american sense.
Comparing French liberalism with classical liberalism as it developed in the British and American contexts involves examining historical and philosophical nuances in the development of liberal thought in these regions. Here’s an overview:
French Liberalism:
Historical Context: French liberalism evolved in the context of the French Revolution and its aftermath. It was heavily influenced by the struggle against absolutism and the ideals of the Revolution: liberty, equality, and fraternity.
State and Society: French liberalism traditionally emphasized the role of the state in safeguarding individual freedoms and maintaining order. It often supported a strong, centralized state as a guarantor of rights and a promoter of the common good.
Rationalism and Reform: Influenced by the Enlightenment, French liberalism placed a strong emphasis on reason and the power of human intellect to reform society. Philosophers like Voltaire and Rousseau were critical in shaping its principles.
Equality and Fraternity: Alongside liberty, equality and fraternity were crucial components. There was a focus on social equality and solidarity as key aspects of a liberal society.
British and American Classical Liberalism:
Historical Context: Classical liberalism in Britain and America developed in the context of the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and the rise of capitalism. It was shaped by thinkers like John Locke, Adam Smith, and later John Stuart Mill.
Individualism and Economic Freedom: There was a stronger emphasis on individualism, private property, and economic freedom. The idea was that a free market and limited government intervention would lead to prosperity and liberty.
Limited Government: A fundamental principle was that the government’s role should be limited to protecting individual rights, particularly life, liberty, and property.
Empiricism and Pragmatism: British liberalism, in particular, was marked by a more empirical and pragmatic approach, as opposed to the rationalist and sometimes idealist tone of French liberalism.
Key Differences:
Role of the State: French liberalism tends to accept a more active role for the state in ensuring individual freedoms and social equality, while British/American classical liberalism emphasizes limited government and free markets.
Concepts of Liberty: French liberalism incorporates a broader social dimension (equality and fraternity), whereas British/American liberalism focuses more on individual liberties and economic freedoms.
Philosophical Underpinnings: French liberalism was more influenced by rationalist Enlightenment philosophy, while British/American liberalism was shaped by empiricism and a pragmatic approach to political and economic life.
Both strands of liberalism share a commitment to individual rights and freedoms, but they diverge in their views on the role of the state, the nature of liberty, and the means of achieving a liberal society.
Reply addressees: @BOB37702515 @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-13 23:37:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735081498783391744
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735050316620419299