This should fit in with HBD somewhere. I’ve long known about the British seeing only the fish and the Chinese seeing the background and that you can’t think anything there isn’t a word for.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 08:42:00 UTC
This should fit in with HBD somewhere. I’ve long known about the British seeing only the fish and the Chinese seeing the background and that you can’t think anything there isn’t a word for.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 08:42:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 07:41:00 UTC
DEAR SEATTLE FRIENDS : ARRIVAL ON TUESDAY.
Well I finally have a flight that is neither through a strike in Germany or a terrorist attack in France, and where I don’t have a flu.
So arriving Tuesday.
It will take me a bit to recover from the trip. And we are 11 hours out of phase. Morning there is evening for my body.
Autism doesn’t like airlines.
See you soon.
Curt.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 07:19:00 UTC
THE TECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF RELIGIONS
The technical properties of a religion are rules or norms, and a set of (costly) rituals, and a mythology, that together provide a means of people to collect in numbers safely, and feel the safety in numbers.
There are really three properties of religions, and all religions use these properties differently. I tend to represent them as a triangle, saying that different approaches emphasize one or more of the properties.
1) Legal Religions – which to some degree the west practices – they contain no mysticism. American judges are fairly close to priests in their devotion to the ‘sacredness’ of the law. (future-looking)
2) Behavioral Religions contain spirituality – the pack response. Emphasis is on ritual for generating the pack response. Stoicism, Shintoism, and to some degree early buddhism. (past-looking)
3) Supernatural Religion. The pack response is obtained through the telling of narrative, and the promise of some mystical reward. (escapism).
In practice most cultures use multiple ‘religions’ for the purpose of creating shared experience, ethos, behavior and trust. We tend to focus on monotheism because the church FORCED us to, because jews force themselves to, and because islam forces its adherents to.
The function as a hierarchy of intelligence dependent upon the abilities of the population.
Mythos at the bottom, for Virtue Ethics.
Rituals in the middle for Deontological Ethics
Procedures at the top for Teleological Ethics.
Hence we do see that as IQ increases the religious emphasis increases from the virtue ethic of the young and ignorant, to the ritual ethic of the young adult, to the technical ethic of the mature.
If one is raised in a religion, It is hard to view religion as a purely ritualistic purely programatic form of education and training. But for all intents and purposes, the function of religious myth is to get you to imagine a ‘model’ by which to made decisions; to practice costly rituals with others in order to invoke the submission of the pack response; and to teach you traditional rules of the social order as if they are physical properties of objective reality (metaphysical) rather than merely a group evolutionary strategy that has been demonstrated to work at perpetuating the population.
If you told a mathematician he had to forget math he would say “well I don’t know how to do that – or think otherwise”, and the religious person says the same.
That is why these things work.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute, Kiev Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 05:58:00 UTC
WHAT WOULD YOU TRADE FOR MORE INCOME EQUALITY?
Income inequality is the result of objective inequality of value to others – in other words, income inequality is evidence that you are not valuable to others. So, to make yourself valuable to others, what voluntary exchanges could you enter into that would equalize income without impeding the voluntary organization of invention, risk-taking, capitalization, production, distribution and trade?
(Personally I would love it if the lower classes would do my cooking, housework, laundry, yard, home maintenance, and shopping while I am risking everything I own to create a new business, and paying people well by doing it, and am entirely responsible for the outcome. Moreover, if income were equal I would not be able to risk everything I own – nor would most entrepreneurs like me. America invents the future for the world for this reason and americans live better than the rest of the world – albeit more unequally with each other as a consequence. )
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 05:38:00 UTC
THANK YOU!! 🙂 He’s amazing. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-15 02:59:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665725763702910976
Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665702332865249280
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665702332865249280
State the assumptions I am making. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 23:57:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665680086130102276
Reply addressees: @CptTibbs @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665678481414557696
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665678481414557696
Now be a good boy and don’t stomp on the nice girl’s thread with sophomoria. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 23:50:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665678155131285507
Reply addressees: @CptTibbs @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665667154902167552
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665667154902167552
I’m saying you’re engaging in deceitful fallacy as a cover for shaming. And, empirically action is insufficient.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 23:48:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665677777853640705
Reply addressees: @CptTibbs @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665667154902167552
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665667154902167552
Cool.:) Yet, I wish it were true. Scribblings both good and bad have disproportionate influence – for generations. End the bad.
Source date (UTC): 2015-11-14 23:46:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665677154194227200
Reply addressees: @HiHoney333
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665667207200817152
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/665667207200817152