(worth repeating)
[H]IERARCHY OF ETHICAL LOGICS
1) Pedagogical Myths...(very young)..........Stories
2) Virtue Ethics.......(young)...............Biographies
3) Rule Ethics.........(inexperience adult)..Laws
4) Outcome Ethics......(experienced adult)...Science
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
Hierarchy Of Ethical Logics
-
Krugman’s world view is that we can play musical chairs forever, and as long as
Krugman’s world view is that we can play musical chairs forever, and as long as the music never stops, and no one has to sit down, then it doesnt matter how many chairs there are (or how many have been privatized by financialization).
The problem is … shocks.
Eventually someone has to sit down.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 12:53:00 UTC
-
Curiously, we might want to look at the data carefully. Because men will vote fo
Curiously, we might want to look at the data carefully. Because men will vote for someone they don’t like, even if women won’t.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 12:51:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674934374270373889
Reply addressees: @GallupNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674933546314764288
IN REPLY TO:
@Gallup
Donald Trump Well-Known, but Not Well-Liked… https://t.co/keA62oPBM2 https://t.co/H39svMVgfh
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674933546314764288
-
Lying: Methods and Techniques .. Plus A Reading List
(important) (first draft) (this ought to make some people think) [W]hat I am struck by when researching this topic, is how primitive the research is into HOW lies are constructed. Here are the Axis I am working with: So sticking with the general rules that:
6) One can speak to:
5) One can convey :
7) One can speak using: -construction-
8) One can speak with:
9) One can construct speech out of: -axis-
10) One can engage in discovery by: -discovery-
10a) one can engage rallying by: -Rallying-
11) One can employ arguments using (true or false) :
CATEGORIES OF LIES? —“Nanavati classifies lies into the following categories:”–
READING LIST Dallas Denery: The Devil Wins: A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment Thomas Carson: Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice Jennifer Mather Saul: Lying, Misleading, and What is Said Clancy Martin: The Philosophy of Deception Herbert Fingarette: Self-Deception Brooke Harrington: Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating Edward Bernays: Propaganda Jason Stanley: How Propaganda Works Hardcover Jeremy Elkins: Truth and Democracy David Livingstone: Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others Daniel Nanavati: A Brief History Of Lies
-
Lying: Methods and Techniques .. Plus A Reading List
(important) (first draft) (this ought to make some people think) [W]hat I am struck by when researching this topic, is how primitive the research is into HOW lies are constructed. Here are the Axis I am working with: So sticking with the general rules that:
6) One can speak to:
5) One can convey :
7) One can speak using: -construction-
8) One can speak with:
9) One can construct speech out of: -axis-
10) One can engage in discovery by: -discovery-
10a) one can engage rallying by: -Rallying-
11) One can employ arguments using (true or false) :
CATEGORIES OF LIES? —“Nanavati classifies lies into the following categories:”–
READING LIST Dallas Denery: The Devil Wins: A History of Lying from the Garden of Eden to the Enlightenment Thomas Carson: Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice Jennifer Mather Saul: Lying, Misleading, and What is Said Clancy Martin: The Philosophy of Deception Herbert Fingarette: Self-Deception Brooke Harrington: Deception: From Ancient Empires to Internet Dating Edward Bernays: Propaganda Jason Stanley: How Propaganda Works Hardcover Jeremy Elkins: Truth and Democracy David Livingstone: Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others Daniel Nanavati: A Brief History Of Lies
-
How Do We Identify The Commons?
[I]nformation, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”. That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.
-
How Do We Identify The Commons?
[I]nformation, Air, Water, Land, Physical Capital, Institutions, Norms, Traditions, Myths – people DEMONSTRATE that they treat these as commons: “that which may not be consumed”. That is what constitutes property-en-toto: that which man has paid costs (of any kind) to acquire and inventory.
-
Explained: The Libertine Fallacy Of Crusoe’s Island Thought Model
“[T]he Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island, Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that surrounds and defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the European nobles and knights. It represents the eastern European territories defended by the Tsars, the Polish-Lithuanian Armies, and the Austro Hungarians. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. The thought model for the evolution of cooperation is the endless grassland of the Pontic steppe, evenly distributed with competitors, who must construct the mutual insurance of property and commons through the organized force of arms – denying that territory, capital and property to others. The Crusoe’s island thought model is not only a fallacy, but also a deception that seeks to justify the non-payment for the defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital, and property from competitors. Jewish Enlightenment Cosmopolitanism in socialist, Libertine libertarianism, and neo-conservatives forms, is an even worse failure than Anglo enlightenment liberalism’s social democracy and political correctness. Because like all of Jewish history, underinvestment in institutions of defense and commons by a migratory pastoral people means they engage in the privatization of costs that should have gone to defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital and property – and the export of cost of defense onto host warriors, who eventually tire of carrying free-riders. There is no free ride. The history of civilization is reducible to the incremental suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation, by the incremental evolution of institutions, laws, traditions, and norms, which suppress it.” —Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute
-
Explained: The Libertine Fallacy Of Crusoe’s Island Thought Model
“[T]he Fallacy of Crusoe’s Island, Surrounded by the sea. But what does the sea that surrounds and defends Crusoe’s island represent? It represents the walls of the ancient master’s house defended by master and warriors. It represents the ghetto’s walls defended by the European nobles and knights. It represents the eastern European territories defended by the Tsars, the Polish-Lithuanian Armies, and the Austro Hungarians. It represents Israel defended by American Navy, Arms, Missiles, and money. The thought model for the evolution of cooperation is the endless grassland of the Pontic steppe, evenly distributed with competitors, who must construct the mutual insurance of property and commons through the organized force of arms – denying that territory, capital and property to others. The Crusoe’s island thought model is not only a fallacy, but also a deception that seeks to justify the non-payment for the defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital, and property from competitors. Jewish Enlightenment Cosmopolitanism in socialist, Libertine libertarianism, and neo-conservatives forms, is an even worse failure than Anglo enlightenment liberalism’s social democracy and political correctness. Because like all of Jewish history, underinvestment in institutions of defense and commons by a migratory pastoral people means they engage in the privatization of costs that should have gone to defense of territory, institutions, norms, capital and property – and the export of cost of defense onto host warriors, who eventually tire of carrying free-riders. There is no free ride. The history of civilization is reducible to the incremental suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation, by the incremental evolution of institutions, laws, traditions, and norms, which suppress it.” —Curt Doolittle, The Philosophy of Aristocracy, The Propertarian Institute
-
The Fallacy of Libertinism’s Crusoe’s Island Though Model. #NRx #AltRight #Conse
The Fallacy of Libertinism’s Crusoe’s Island Though Model. #NRx #AltRight #Conservative #libertarian https://t.co/iTPyvDlF65
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-10 12:33:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674929874574950400