(still working on this but it’s getting there) [W]e can stop it. The problem is, that the way we stop it is non-trivial: (a) require all issues released at market price with no favoritism (equal starting gate provision). (b) prevent insurance (hedges), require proportional holding of debt, force proportional losses (‘skin in the game’) (c) eliminate protection from liability for all individuals involved in any transaction, and reward (commission) for reporting offenders – (make it profitable to report your boss or peers.) (d) professionalize banking just like law and certified public accounting increasing the quality of people in the industry. (e) require total transparency of all OPM investor transactions. (what I recommend). (f) move all companies to block chain ledgers. (g) tax arbitrage and volatility entirely, while eliminating taxation on dividends, and appreciation. (eliminate trading and force investing) (h) Buy (federally) ‘bottom-feeder’ Mastercard, and redistribute liquidity directly to citizens rather than through the financial sector and interest rates – in exchange for elimination of sales tax and minimum wage. (what I recommend). These cards cannot be attached or indebted for any purpose whatsoever, private or public. The money is split between disposable and retirement security. The retirement funds are investable. (i) Stocks provide no voting or ownership provisions (positive), only legal defense(negative). One may contract for ownership provisions as condition of investment, but one cannot simply buy up control of companies without consent. (j) Eliminate boards of directors – I have not seen any empirical evidence that a board has any value whatsoever that could not be provided by an advisory board that assists in the development of relationships and expertise. But boards appear to have a negative influence on business. Transparency and rule of law are the only material defense. We no longer need political representatives in this age, and we no longer need the private sector equivalent. My experience is that boards that do not consist of material owners are universally damaging to a business. (The Buffett Principle: substantive owners with deep knowledge of the business, only). Both boards of directors and stock voting are hangovers from the paper and pencil era. (k) Elimination of all non-safety employment regulation – voluntary association, merit based. This social engineering is harmful to social cooperation, and a constant source of cost and conflict that encourages the internal equivalent of a black market in information. (l) Eliminate taxation on unrealized profits (this nonsense we go through for options for employees). We go through tons of falsehoods to circumvent the fact that while large transfers may occur almost no profits do. So eliminate the burden of preventing false taxation by simply requiring tax only on realized profits. (j) Move all accounting, banking, and credit, nationally if not world-wide to thirteen four week periods, and off the lunar cycle invented in the age of sail. STRENGTHEN 1) rule of law, individual accountability, civic morality, truth content, 2) encourage more Andresson Horowitz investment organization (innovation producing risk taking) and less Goldman Sachs (systemic parasitism). PRESERVE 1) I want to preserve the lottery effect that the stock market provides to entrepreneur, business, and industry, but to limit the finance sector’s ability to disproportionately privatize issues – which is how it’s done today. With little or no value to the economy, business, and citizenry. ELIMINATE 1) Eliminates the ability of the financial sector to direct the economy, only profit from funding the fulfillment consumer demand, thereby forcing the consumer and the investor to have the same interests. 2) Eliminates financial predation on business and industry. (which if you have been involved in it – and I have – is unimaginable ) 3) Eliminates costly burdens on organizations that must preserve multiple fallacies: a) that tax, credit, and operational accounting differ because credit cycles demand stability that does not exist, taxes demand returns that do not exist. b) social engineering compliance is costly and we merely work hard to circumvent it. c) fallacy that the financial sector works in our interest. d) if we distribute liquidity directly outside of the financial system then minimum wage is unnecessary, and the incentive to limit immigration will exist. ( more… but I’m out of time for this today. ) Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
Ending Financial Sector Predation
(still working on this but it’s getting there) [W]e can stop it. The problem is, that the way we stop it is non-trivial: (a) require all issues released at market price with no favoritism (equal starting gate provision). (b) prevent insurance (hedges), require proportional holding of debt, force proportional losses (‘skin in the game’) (c) eliminate protection from liability for all individuals involved in any transaction, and reward (commission) for reporting offenders – (make it profitable to report your boss or peers.) (d) professionalize banking just like law and certified public accounting increasing the quality of people in the industry. (e) require total transparency of all OPM investor transactions. (what I recommend). (f) move all companies to block chain ledgers. (g) tax arbitrage and volatility entirely, while eliminating taxation on dividends, and appreciation. (eliminate trading and force investing) (h) Buy (federally) ‘bottom-feeder’ Mastercard, and redistribute liquidity directly to citizens rather than through the financial sector and interest rates – in exchange for elimination of sales tax and minimum wage. (what I recommend). These cards cannot be attached or indebted for any purpose whatsoever, private or public. The money is split between disposable and retirement security. The retirement funds are investable. (i) Stocks provide no voting or ownership provisions (positive), only legal defense(negative). One may contract for ownership provisions as condition of investment, but one cannot simply buy up control of companies without consent. (j) Eliminate boards of directors – I have not seen any empirical evidence that a board has any value whatsoever that could not be provided by an advisory board that assists in the development of relationships and expertise. But boards appear to have a negative influence on business. Transparency and rule of law are the only material defense. We no longer need political representatives in this age, and we no longer need the private sector equivalent. My experience is that boards that do not consist of material owners are universally damaging to a business. (The Buffett Principle: substantive owners with deep knowledge of the business, only). Both boards of directors and stock voting are hangovers from the paper and pencil era. (k) Elimination of all non-safety employment regulation – voluntary association, merit based. This social engineering is harmful to social cooperation, and a constant source of cost and conflict that encourages the internal equivalent of a black market in information. (l) Eliminate taxation on unrealized profits (this nonsense we go through for options for employees). We go through tons of falsehoods to circumvent the fact that while large transfers may occur almost no profits do. So eliminate the burden of preventing false taxation by simply requiring tax only on realized profits. (j) Move all accounting, banking, and credit, nationally if not world-wide to thirteen four week periods, and off the lunar cycle invented in the age of sail. STRENGTHEN 1) rule of law, individual accountability, civic morality, truth content, 2) encourage more Andresson Horowitz investment organization (innovation producing risk taking) and less Goldman Sachs (systemic parasitism). PRESERVE 1) I want to preserve the lottery effect that the stock market provides to entrepreneur, business, and industry, but to limit the finance sector’s ability to disproportionately privatize issues – which is how it’s done today. With little or no value to the economy, business, and citizenry. ELIMINATE 1) Eliminates the ability of the financial sector to direct the economy, only profit from funding the fulfillment consumer demand, thereby forcing the consumer and the investor to have the same interests. 2) Eliminates financial predation on business and industry. (which if you have been involved in it – and I have – is unimaginable ) 3) Eliminates costly burdens on organizations that must preserve multiple fallacies: a) that tax, credit, and operational accounting differ because credit cycles demand stability that does not exist, taxes demand returns that do not exist. b) social engineering compliance is costly and we merely work hard to circumvent it. c) fallacy that the financial sector works in our interest. d) if we distribute liquidity directly outside of the financial system then minimum wage is unnecessary, and the incentive to limit immigration will exist. ( more… but I’m out of time for this today. ) Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
-
What don’t I understand? Other than games – including the piloting of machines –
What don’t I understand?
Other than games – including the piloting of machines – what good are vr headsets?
I see the value of overlays. I can see getting so used to magicleap that I can’t travel without it.
I can’t see the value in immersion other than for games
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 10:36:00 UTC
-
OBJECTIVE GOOD VS SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE (the thrust of this argument is a confla
OBJECTIVE GOOD VS SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE
(the thrust of this argument is a conflation of good and preference, and my opponent’s presumption that because of that conflation there are no ‘goods’. This may be a bit hard to parse, but there are objective goods.)
I think it is that I simply failed to provide sufficient touch stones so that you would draw the conclusions on your own.
In other words the argument I make is a necessary one. And that is why it’s an is.
That might take a bit but we will get there.
—” I would add my surprise to see you mention at the end that this is all about how things are and not should be.”— Mark
I Think you’re referring to this statement:
—“(g) as far as I know I am explaining what men do (is), not what they should do (should).”—
Which in the context I mean that men do what they must do. what they must do is what they in fact do (“is”). And what they should do is what they must do, and do (“should”). In other words, there is no difference between must, can, is and should. Or better stated, “Man justifies his group evolutionary strategy, whatever it is – he survives.”
—“I see you started out apparently very much talking about good/bad in a thread on political views necessarily based on moral views. So…?”—
So instead I am stating that moral principles necessary for in-group cooperation and are universal necessities (subject to limits), and that despite local variation in the portfolio of norms necessary for the purposes of competition, production, free rider prevention, and rent seeking, that must, can, is, and should are identical propositions.
The only question is cooperation between groups with different portfolios that are incompatible. In compatibility is universally decidable by property rights independent of local variation in the portfolio. And this also is what we see men do in reality.
So objective morality – rules necessary for rational beneficial voluntary cooperation – is universal.
–“good”— Mark
Now what is the difference between “preference” and “good”? Well I can prefer something I can experience myself. We can say that fulfilling a preference feels good. We can also say that something is good even if it isn’t immediately preferable.
So to avoid confusion, lets say that **a preference is an experiential good, and a good is either an non-experiential intertemporal personal benefit, or objectively decidable interpersonal benefit.**
–“starting point”— Mark
So, i start with the first question of “why don’t I kill you and take your stuff”. The first question of ethics.
The answer is then one of short and long run costs versus benefits. As long as one’s opponents promise greater cost than reward, we choose cooperation or boycott – if we can choose boycott.
From there, to the disproportionate rewards of cooperation assuming predation is costly. Or as biological evolution has informed us: we possess the intuitive ability to both imitate, and beyond imitate to empathize, and beyond empathize to cooperate, and beyond cooperation to anticipate demand for cooperation. We evolved it because cooperation is disproportionately rewarding. But when we cooperate we must prevent free riders from undermining the incentive to cooperate – hence the human intuition to punish free riders (cheaters) even at high personal cost.
If a group decides that survival is not ‘good’ (bearing a cost of an intertemporal and directly imperceptible forecast subject to risk) and does not survive then it is not ‘good’ for others to imitate it if they wish to survive. Hence over time, good is defined as what others can imitate in order to survive. So, good is an evolutionary imperative, not a preference. A preference may feel good by analogy but it is not an abstract ‘good’ – a value judgement.
ie: subjective preferences and objective goods are different things. And those goods that are in fact ‘good’ are objectively ascertainable over time independent of subjective preference.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 10:10:00 UTC
-
“Kerry reminds agreement crafted to avoid Congress…”— Now, (a) why is any ci
—“Kerry reminds agreement crafted to avoid Congress…”—
Now, (a) why is any circumvention of the division of powers tolerable?
And, (b) why doesn’t doing such a thing end one in prison, including every individual involved in crafting it?
WE NEED SOME BURNING CROSSES
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 08:43:00 UTC
-
REDUCING H.B.D. TO RULE OF LAW I think the tide has changed and that HBD has won
REDUCING H.B.D. TO RULE OF LAW
I think the tide has changed and that HBD has won out over “The Great Boazian Lie”.
My position on HBD is:
1) the majority of differences between the great tribes (races) is in the rates of reproduction of the lower classes. Or conversely, the rates of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the concentration of reproduction in the middle and upper classes.
2) that sexual maturity regulates aggression and impulse and time preference.(humans are no different from foxes or any other creature). Hence the increasing aggression (and penis size) from east asian, northern whites(Ukrainian), southern(Iranian) whites, arabs, and africans.
3) cranial size effects intelligence disproportionately since intelligence is largely a function of memory.
4) there appears to be a difference in the evolution of different brain agents (language in particular) and in cooperation (frontal lobe) that is expressed in the races, and verbal self expression both limits frustration and increases cooperation.
5) raw athletic ability decreases with decreases in sexual maturity.
THEREFORE
The problem for any society to solve is largely one of reducing the relative size of the individuals below what we consider 106IQ today, and a target for any polity should be a distribution no less that 115, and preferably 125 if we wish to see ‘Star Trek’ – whereas the current downward trend is producing a devolution to a future of ‘Favelas’.
WORSE
It is possible that we have passed peak human, since it is very difficult to cleans defective genes from a polity, and intelligence is comprised of a complex set of genetic biases.
EXAMPLES
China surpasses india both because of superior suppression of the underclasses, and superior ability of the red army to force literacy.
The west succeeded because of (a) Aristocratic egalitarianism (b) martial truth (d) dramatic culling of the lower classes both by starvation, access to land, and aggressive hanging.
You do not so much improve your population as limit the harm done to it by the lower classes.
This is a consistent theme that I’ve discovered in most of my work: we do not know the truth but we know falsehood. WE do not know goods but we know bads. We cannot breed better men, we can only stop bad men from breeding more.
The EUGENICS program was perhaps the most important objective of western man, and the failure of it due to women and pseudosciences was the second catastrophe.
1) The Enlightenment fallacy of oppressed man vs eugenic civilization.
2) The Enlightenment undermining of monarchy, aristocracy, instead of addition of new houses for newly participatory classes.
3) The enfranchisement of women and women’s advocacy of enfranchising slaves as a means of gaining their own enfranchisement.
4) The Jewish Cosmopolitan Pseudoscientific movement as an attempt to create a second Religion for women and slaves (underclasses): Boaz(sociology), Marx(economics), Freud (psychology), Frankfurt School (politics).
5) The Anglo attack on german civilization in the first war. The anglo attack on german civilization in the second war, and failure of Germany to restore european civilization to aristocratic, aesthetic, and egalitarian origins.
6) The adoption of the Pseudoscientific Religion by the Academy, State, Media complex and its appeal to women in academy: as revenue, state voting as power, and consumer consumption of goods as revenue. (a degree in other than STEM fields appears to be nothing more than a modern sale of Indulgences to build universities instead of churches.)
7) The 1965/66 Immigration law by which the Women, Blacks, Jews, the Pseudoscientific Religion of the Academy, State, Media complex sought to achieve through depopulation (destruction of the family) and immigration (invasion) what they could not achieve by propaganda.
8) The failure of the masculine, familial, conservative, libertarian, and scientific thought leadership to produce a body of thought to counter the second use of women as a means of distributing the Pseudoscientific Revolution’s attempt at the Second Great Lie (pseudoscience) second only to the First Great Lie (monotheism). (Which Propertarianism and Testimonialism, Genetic and Cognitive science, plus a century of recorded damage to civilization help to overturn.)
9) the great wealth to be made from the conquest and sale of the North American (US/Canadian), and Australian continents, has been interpreted as a property of American Democracy rather than american democracy is a temporary luxury made possible by the rather ridiculous wealth from the 300 year long sale of the Continent to immigrants. And while we were limited to immigration of middle class gene pools without access to land from above the Hanjal line, we now are engaged in a pollution of all forms of capital. (the same applies to Russia by the way.)
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 06:03:00 UTC
-
BEHOLD IMPULSIVE WOMAN, THE PANDORA: DESTROYER OF CIVILIZATION Men developed the
BEHOLD IMPULSIVE WOMAN, THE PANDORA: DESTROYER OF CIVILIZATION
Men developed the many prohibitions and regulations of male impulses, biases and intuitions for no less than ten thousand years.
And yet we handed women equal political power without equal prohibitions and regulations on female impulses, biases, and intuitions.
Men used civilization to prolong consumption in favor of capital accumulation. Women used the voting booth to pull forward consumption in favor of unbounded reproduction. Women undid in just over one century thousands of years of civilization.
Unlike ‘conservatives’ I do not seek to withdraw women’s participation, but to limit the damage done by female impulses, biases and intuitions just as we limited the damage that can be done by male impulses, biases and intuitions.
Unfortunately for the Feminist movement, it has become clear that it was the impulses of in-group women that we controlled throughout the process of civilization, and the impulses of out-group men we controlled through the process of civilization.
So the evolution of property accomplished both the regulation of women’s impulsive reproduction at the expense of capital accumulation. Or put more simply: it was as equally important to regulate women as it was men.
But our institutions and laws regulated men, while our norms regulated women. Given access to the ballot box, and thereby to political power, women destroyed civilization in pursuit of their impulses.
Houses for competing group evolutionary strategies.
Houses like the senate and jury, hear appeals.
Contracts for commons must pass dissent by involuntary transfer, not assent.
It is hard for us to grasp that there is not much that is a knowable good goal, only knowable good process for achieving goals. Yet that there are knowable bad goals and knowable bad processes, and knowable bad actions.
That which is bad can be known: they are truths.
That which is good is that which is not bad.
That which is better is a matter of preference not truth.
We can enfranchise anyone under the prevention of the bad.
And we can return Pandora to the box.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 05:19:00 UTC
-
GOVERNMENT and MONOPOLY VS MILITIA and MARKET (important)(profound) When there i
GOVERNMENT and MONOPOLY VS MILITIA and MARKET
(important)(profound)
When there is government the responsibility is ‘theirs’.
When there is militia the responsibility is ‘ours’.
Where there is rule of law, there is scientific rule.
Where there is a market for commons, there is a civic society.
Where there is a market for goods and services there is productivity
Where there is a market for reproduction there is eugenic reproduction.
The people who create change in favor of excellence.
THE MARKET SOCIETY
Miltia: Market Warfare
Judiciary: Market Jurisprudence
Houses: Market Government
Property: Market Productivity
Monogamy: Market Reproduction
Market = Meritocracy = Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 04:54:00 UTC
-
FINANCIAL PREDATION (still working on this but it’s getting there) We can stop i
FINANCIAL PREDATION
(still working on this but it’s getting there)
We can stop it. The problem is, that the way we stop it is non-trivial:
(a) require all issues released at market price with no favoritism (equal starting gate provision).
(b) prevent insurance (hedges), require proportional holding of debt, force proportional losses (‘skin in the game’)
(c) eliminate protection from liability for all individuals involved in any transaction, and reward (commission) for reporting offenders – (make it profitable to report your boss or peers.)
(d) professionalize banking just like law and certified public accounting increasing the quality of people in the industry.
(e) require total transparency of all OPM investor transactions. (what I recommend).
(f) move all companies to block chain ledgers.
(g) tax arbitrage and volatility entirely, while eliminating taxation on dividends, and appreciation. (eliminate trading and force investing)
(h) Buy (federally) ‘bottom-feeder’ Mastercard, and redistribute liquidity directly to citizens rather than through the financial sector and interest rates – in exchange for elimination of sales tax and minimum wage. (what I recommend). These cards cannot be attached or indebted for any purpose whatsoever, private or public. The money is split between disposable and retirement security. The retirement funds are investable.
(i) Stocks provide no voting or ownership provisions (positive), only legal defense(negative). One may contract for ownership provisions as condition of investment, but one cannot simply buy up control of companies without consent.
(j) Eliminate boards of directors – I have not seen any empirical evidence that a board has any value whatsoever that could not be provided by an advisory board that assists in the development of relationships and expertise. But boards appear to have a negative influence on business. Transparency and rule of law are the only material defense. We no longer need political representatives in this age, and we no longer need the private sector equivalent. My experience is that boards that do not consist of material owners are universally damaging to a business. (The Buffett Principle: substantive owners with deep knowledge of the business, only). Both boards of directors and stock voting are hangovers from the paper and pencil era.
(k) Elimination of all non-safety employment regulation – voluntary association, merit based. This social engineering is harmful to social cooperation, and a constant source of cost and conflict that encourages the internal equivalent of a black market in information.
(l) Eliminate taxation on unrealized profits (this nonsense we go through for options for employees). We go through tons of falsehoods to circumvent the fact that while large transfers may occur almost no profits do. So eliminate the burden of preventing false taxation by simply requiring tax only on realized profits.
(j) Move all accounting, banking, and credit, nationally if not world-wide to thirteen four week periods, and off the lunar cycle invented in the age of sail.
STRENGTHEN
1) rule of law, individual accountability, civic morality, truth content,
2) encourage more Andresson Horowitz investment organization (innovation producing risk taking) and less Goldman Sachs (systemic parasitism).
PRESERVE
1) I want to preserve the lottery effect that the stock market provides to entrepreneur, business, and industry, but to limit the finance sector’s ability to disproportionately privatize issues – which is how it’s done today. With little or no value to the economy, business, and citizenry.
ELIMINATE
1) Eliminates the ability of the financial sector to direct the economy, only profit from funding the fulfillment consumer demand, thereby forcing the consumer and the investor to have the same interests.
2) Eliminates financial predation on business and industry. (which if you have been involved in it – and I have – is unimaginable )
3) Eliminates costly burdens on organizations that must preserve multiple fallacies:
a) that tax, credit, and operational accounting differ because credit cycles demand stability that does not exist, taxes demand returns that do not exist.
b) social engineering compliance is costly and we merely work hard to circumvent it.
c) fallacy that the financial sector works in our interest.
d) if we distribute liquidity directly outside of the financial system then minimum wage is unnecessary, and the incentive to limit immigration will exist.
( more… but I’m out of time for this today. )
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 03:43:00 UTC
-
FREE AND FRIEND —‘Frei’ is simply High German for the ancient Germanic words f
FREE AND FRIEND
—‘Frei’ is simply High German for the ancient Germanic words for Free, as ‘Fri’ is in Friesian. Link below shows that ‘Fri’ is also the basis of the word friend which originally meant a free member of one’s tribe. Friend and Frieden I would posit have the same origin. Most certainly freedom and peace both pre-date the state and are linked to free nation. — Aaron Kahland
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 03:17:00 UTC