Author: Curt Doolittle

  • I am a pretty nice guy most of the time. I am certainly absurdly generous and pa

    I am a pretty nice guy most of the time.

    I am certainly absurdly generous and patient.

    I think I am mostly positive unless business or money is making me crazy.

    I have had pretty much nothing but long term relationships.

    But I can get my hackles up and push back pretty hard when criticized for things that are not what I consider ‘my fault’.

    In particular I just cannot take this “why do you not think like I do” sh_t from women.And worse, aggressive criticism. Passive aggressive criticism. Makes me crazy.

    And I don’t want to be one of those men who smacks women, even when they deserve it – which they do, or history wouldn’t be full of men smacking women around. But in this part of the world, women feel perfectly comfortable spewing their ignorant, selfish drivel at you with venom. Maybe that’s why they aren’t crazy like western women – the emotion ‘gets out’.

    I am not ever, ever, ever going to remember anything that isn’t on a post-it in front of my face. I don’t remember my OWN stuff. Certainly not anyone else’s. Why? I don’t ‘live’ in the ‘world of the moment’. I live in a world of ideas, and when other people are around, I drop back to earth for a few moments, and am always surprised to find such interesting people here.

    When I was a kid I had to wear my house key around my neck because otherwise I would never take it with me. I would always forget it. I learned how to break into houses by breaking into my own home, simply because I forgot the key all the time.

    I had to write a schedule on the back of my notebook in order to remember what day and class it was.

    I can’t remember a grocery list with more than two items. (Literally).

    I have always had an assistant at work. Why? Otherwise I’d never get anywhere.

    My business partner Chris used to tease me that my short term memory was erased by the first doorway I walked through. (Its true, although not as much as it used to be).

    I don’t use credit cards, or take loans because I never remember them. I have about zero sense of time passing. I rarely even know what day it is.

    I don’t ‘plan’ anything. I create a network of overlapping strategies, and I make task lists that move the needle in as many of those strategies at once. I follow my strategy – relentlessly, single mindedly – for years, if not decades. I work pretty much 14-18 hours a day. Every day. Seven days a week. And I pretty much always have.

    I’m an ‘exaggerated male’. Men think in drawers. One drawer at a time. We are incognizant of other drawers. When we open one drawer we close the last drawer, and all is forgotten. etc.

    I used to tell critics that picking on me about remembering things is like picking on a color blind person for not seeing the difference between red and green.

    I mean, I used to, but I don’t walk around telling people ‘omg, wow, I can’t imagine you are that fucking stupid!!!” Which, I promise you, is how I react to about 97% of all human speech. Instead I forgive people for their incapacity and enjoy what they *DO* have to offer. (Strangely enough, ordinary folk say a lot less stupid stuff than people with university educations.)

    Now by contrast, I can solve anything. Literally. I am pretty sure that no matter what problem I chose I would eventually solve it. I’m not fast at it, but I will absolutely figure it out. I remember everything I hear, much of what I read, and most of what I see. That’s my magic gift. I can crunch ideas like computers crunch numbers.

    SO why do you think I feel ‘lost’ without a woman in my life? And why does a certain kind of woman enjoy being around an autistic version of Yoda? For some women, men like me are awesome toys. For me, women are a strategic necessity. You see? I think the way they think is magic. I can’t do that. It’s awesome.

    But if a woman wants me to remember anything, no matter what it is, you might as well ask me to fly. Seriously.

    So to all my past and future mates, it’s not that I don’t care. It’s that I CANT and it really f—-king pisses me off.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-07 10:26:00 UTC

  • WE HAVE THE MOMENTUM NOW. LETS HOPE WE DON”T SCREW IT UP. Gotta transform the wo

    WE HAVE THE MOMENTUM NOW. LETS HOPE WE DON”T SCREW IT UP.

    Gotta transform the working class arguments soon.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-07 09:31:00 UTC

  • EMINENT DOMAIN At what point are you forcing unnecessary expenses upon neighborh

    EMINENT DOMAIN

    At what point are you forcing unnecessary expenses upon neighborhoods (sewer upgrades, road upgrades)?

    At what point does your satisfaction impose so severely upon the satisfaction of others that you are causing others lost opportunity?

    The problem with eminent domain is ‘market price’, rather than developed price. In other words, why do not landholders get shares in future revenues? Or at least three times the market value of the property.

    Conversely, why should a slumlord get anything a all?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-07 09:28:00 UTC

  • Hilarious 3rd-waver

    Hilarious 3rd-waver.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 19:20:00 UTC

  • RA Skaskiw: Have yo seen this guy Fedor Emelianenko? He’s is unbelievable. But h

    RA Skaskiw: Have yo seen this guy Fedor Emelianenko? He’s is unbelievable. But he still lost to … How did he get taken?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 16:31:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 16:20:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW UNDER UNIVERSAL STANDING CONSTITUTES A COMPETITIVE GOVERNMENT – WITH

    NATURAL LAW UNDER UNIVERSAL STANDING CONSTITUTES A COMPETITIVE GOVERNMENT – WITHOUT THE NEED FOR POLYLOGISM

    (reposted from elsewhere for archival purposes)

    As far as I know, natural law, like physical law is a monopoly – in other words, there is only one ‘true’ law that we must discover.

    So I would prefer rule of law, just as I prefer scientists to not create pseudoscience (pseudo physical law), i prefer judges not to create pseudo moral science ( pseudo-natural-law.)

    With an independent judiciary, universal standing (everyone has the right to sue in matters of commons), and rule of law (every individual is subject to the same natural law without exception), I do not see how that is not competition. Competition in the market for truth.

    Conversely, a polylegal / polylogical system is undecidable, and if not identical, then at least one of the options consists of pseudo-science, if not error, bias, wishful thinking, or deceit.

    Furthermore, the more competition under the single law the ‘harder’ it becomes (more empirically falsified).

    I would prefer a market for the production of commons, consisting of different houses representing different interests, consisting of members chosen by lot, deciding on the preferability of submitted proposals. And that any contract acceptable, strictly constructed, that survives legal scrutiny (criticism) is possible. (ie: dissent rather than assent). The question is only how budget is allocated between the houses. The choices are rather obvious. Precisely because the lower classes have behavior to trade and the upper classes money. (which is the whole issue here).

    Under this structure one can be barred from using a commons he does not wish to pay for.

    There are a host of reasons behind this construction but I’m not going to list all of them right now.

    And the subject is very deep. And I don’t have time to get into it right now (My product is taking all my time.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 16:12:00 UTC

  • (There just aren’t a lot of philosophers writing software. And if they are, give

    (There just aren’t a lot of philosophers writing software. And if they are, given the nature of dweebs, they are working on puzzles, not problems. And there is a very great difference between a puzzle and a problem. ) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 15:50:00 UTC

  • Untitled


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 13:44:00 UTC

  • ARTS, ANCHORING, AND WHY ARTISTS RUN THEIR COURSE (note to finish later) (why mo

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-hail-caesar-underwhelms-862324THE ARTS, ANCHORING, AND WHY ARTISTS RUN THEIR COURSE

    (note to finish later) (why movies are flopping)

    The Cohen brother’s ‘taste’ has failed them.

    All artist’s tastes fail them.

    Anchoring is inescapable in all of us. But it’s worst in the intuitive arts.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-02-06 13:37:00 UTC