感谢您的帮助和支持。 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 17:58:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737895213387886790
Reply addressees: @winterbeauty888
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737858813061992643
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
(evolutionary vs devolutionary)
(evolutionary vs devolutionary)
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 17:54:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737894361256313007
Reply addressees: @SaintLaurent254 @duwadh @entelechhhy @FuryForth
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737874959182033042
-
Yes. We are getting books plural out of it. 😉 The Book outlines are on the site
Yes. We are getting books plural out of it. 😉
The Book outlines are on the site with content brought into it as we work. We had to break it into volumes:
The Volumes
https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/
Including:
The Law:
https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/part-xx-reforms-constitution/part-seven-the-reforms/
The Science:
https://naturallawinstitute.com/docs/the-law/the-introduction-2/
The…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 17:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737894090765750345
Reply addressees: @KeybrdKshatriya @DanielF70060768
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737875355304686007
-
Yes. We are getting books plural out of it. 😉 The Book outlines are on the site
Yes. We are getting books plural out of it. 😉
The Book outlines are on the site with content brought into it as we work. We had to break it into volumes:
The Volumes
https://t.co/22WTi4tMMz
Including:
The Law:
https://t.co/mrcWlcFv3B
The Science:
https://t.co/FDhdNix0pp
The Philosophy
https://t.co/SLpMQkQUZV
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 17:53:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737894090576998400
-
What in aggregate behavior can you provide objective proof of yourself (nothing)
What in aggregate behavior can you provide objective proof of yourself (nothing). What can we EXPLAIN using the empirical evidence of behavior, and the behavioral science that causes it?
Asking for proof is evidence of incompetence. Asking for explanation requires you have requisite knowledge to understand it.
So if you (a) ask for proof and in doing so (b) demonstrate you lack the requisite knowledge to hold an opinion, the why do you assume your opinion is worth anything whatsoever to yourself or anyone else?Reply addressees: @cryptogeni @Turbo_Flux @TurkeyJC1 @DanielF70060768
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 14:49:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737847665449402368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737846684263293299
-
I am a very serious person. And I do serious work. Yet you do not propose an arg
I am a very serious person. And I do serious work. Yet you do not propose an argument, and instead, simply accusation without it.
Interesting that you would choose geopolitics which is the study of politicking vs behavioral science and geostrategy which are the study of…
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 14:46:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737847023666405697
Reply addressees: @Oenoan @entelechhhy @Glenn_Diesen @TheDuranReal
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737842099532533851
-
I’m happy to debate and you appear intellectually honest, thought I’m not sure y
I’m happy to debate and you appear intellectually honest, thought I’m not sure you have the requisite knowledge and for some reason you’re operating from presumption.
Men are only averse to debate with women because they find it fruitless.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 14:04:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737836502095155525
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @ezra_tezra @lacaille8760 @DanielF70060768
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737835805429891142
-
No. UW Med, Seattle
No. UW Med, Seattle.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 13:51:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737833123692380566
Reply addressees: @MoMothra54 @spaceangelvoice @TysonBay @DanielF70060768
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737824324994711954
-
I am an aspie as well. This is a subject I had no intention of becoming an exper
I am an aspie as well. This is a subject I had no intention of becoming an expert in – my work required it. And I dont happen to like the result. But it is what it is.
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 10:05:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737776361324859409
Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @TysonBay @DanielF70060768
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737772743272038753
-
Then you should know the research on neural development and organization, result
Then you should know the research on neural development and organization, resulting cognitive, IQ constitution, personality, moral, linguistic, antisocial begavior, and mental illness even if you dont know my work in sex differencs in lying.
If you do, or did, you would, as all others in the field do, not speak as you did but ask specific questions or propose specific arguments.
And furthermore, given behavioral econ, like all econ is male dominant and replicable, and cog science male dominant and replicable, and both fields diverged from psychology and sociology, and the replication crisis in science is endemic in those two fields, both of which are majority female, what then gives you the odd impression men are not good at social science when all the evidence is to the contrary?Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @TysonBay @DanielF70060768
Source date (UTC): 2023-12-21 10:02:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737775529623687168
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737771519042895900