Curt Doolittle

Author: Curt Doolittle

  • SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: CHURCH AND ARISTOCRACY? So the conservative(eugenic

    SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: CHURCH AND ARISTOCRACY?

    So the conservative(eugenic, meritocratic) movement is still divided into:

    CHURCH(Priest/Morality/family) : Gossip/Shaming/Rallying BURGHER(Merchant/Money/production) : Trade/Payment AND ARISTOCRACY(Warriors/Law/defense) : Violence/Limits

    With the Christian Conservatives, the Libertarians, and the Military Aristocracy?

    Why do we need a conflict between those ideologies and languages?

    We evolved a market for the trade between our divisions. Why do we not return to a market?

    Why don’t we divide our profits from commons commerce and trade evenly by house, and within house by person, and policy by the same?

    Why does the classical liberal project that sought to take power from the church and aristocracy have some claim to monopoly of control over the commons?

    We can reverse the errors of liberalism without reversing its advancements. Why don’t we have houses for each class?

    Why don’t we return to a market for the commons where the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy between the classes and genders?

    There is no reason. Except that all the rent seekers and thieves are more interested in preserving their parasitism than in returning to a market for commons that computes the truth of the good rather than uses lies to create lies that produce the bad that we live under.

    Western man’s institutions perform like a great calculator of transcendence. All others perform like a great calculator of stagnation.

    WHY? WESTERN MAN HAS A GENETIC BIAS TOWARD OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE. AND THE INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO MAKE USE OF IT. AND HE FORCED THESE BIASES INTO HIS INSTITUTIONS.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:55:00 UTC

  • You cannot experience the economic benefits of Natural Law, Common Law, Universa

    You cannot experience the economic benefits of Natural Law, Common Law, Universal Standing, Rule of Law (Universal applicability), Testimonial Truth, Testimony, Jury, Property, Money, Credit, Interest, the Sacred Natural Commons(public behavior), The Sacred Grove (park), the Militia and Chivalry, high trust, and the nuclear family, without having all of them.

    This is the cult of our people: Natural Law: truth in all things. Testimony.

    Sharia Law, Jewish Law, Byzantine and Asiatic Decree, are incompatible with Natural Law (science) from which our western “goods” are created.

    There is but one law of man, just as there is but one law of physical science.

    All else is error, bias, wishful thinking, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit: FRAUD.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:47:00 UTC

  • I have spent much of the past year on religion. I knew the institutional structu

    I have spent much of the past year on religion.

    I knew the institutional structure of it going in.

    I knew the incentives to participate going in.

    It took me a whole freaking year though to flesh it out.

    It was the most uncomfortable topic because it is the one where we carry the greatest bias and denial.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:41:00 UTC

  • THE ANSWER (religion) Just because your ancestors valued a particular comforting

    THE ANSWER

    (religion)

    Just because your ancestors valued a particular comforting lie or falsehood is not a reason to perpetuate the lie or falsehood. We are comfortable now with suppressing lies with physical science where were were not so in the past.

    We are currently uncomfortable with suppressing lies in social science: ethics, politics, economics, religion, and war, but we will not be so uncomfortable in the future.

    I am almost certain that the gains from ending lies in social science will be as great as those from ending lies in physical science.

    But I suspect an even greater effort to preserve lies in social science than the effort to preserve lies in physical science.

    Why? Because the church had only the pulpit, which we eventually defeated with the press. But the Academy has the media, and we are not yet sure that the internet is as capable of defeating the lies of the academy as the book was in defeating the lies of the church.

    Both have had the same incentives: to perpetuate their income by the sale of forgiveness or indulgences, just as the academy sells the promise of prosperity and diplomas.

    The monetary incentives of the church and academy are the same.

    The customer base of the church and the academy are the same.

    The church sold mysticism for millennia.

    The academy has been selling pseudoscience for over a century.

    The way we end the academy’s lies is to defund it like we did the church. The way we defund it is through the same revolution that it took to defund the church.

    But if we merely shift the academy to something new, just as we shifted the church to the academy, we have only moved to a new problem rather than solving the problem.

    The answer is to reform the church and the academy so that they sell truths, not lies. Truths in physical science, truth in social science, truth in what is best called ‘spiritual science’: mindfulness.

    There are many ways to produce mindfulness: from stoic philosophy, to sport, to yoga, to meditation, to the piety and sacredness of commons and ritual, to the creation of arts. The human mind requires mindfulness without the constant peer feedback of the consanguinous tribe. The greater the division of knowledge and labor, the more important is mindfulness for the happiness of the human mind.

    So it is possible to construct a church, academy, and commons that produces truth in physical, truth in the social, and truth in the mind.

    We need no lies. There is no excuse for lies. Lies exist to profit only from the loss of others.

    We can sell truth rather than sell fraud.

    We can remake the west.

    Because it is these truths that were the original path of western civilization before the great lies were leashed upon us by the great liars of history.

    Science: truth in the physical.

    Nature: truth in the commons

    Law: truth in the market.

    Stoicism: truth in the mind.

    We are the people who invented truth.

    Truth is our religion.

    We can return to the truth.

    End the lies

    Remake man in the image of gods: truth.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:37:00 UTC

  • Western women have almost always dressed fashionably when possible, (a) because

    Western women have almost always dressed fashionably when possible, (a) because of higher sexual dimorphism and slightly lower sexual maturity, and greater feminine beauty because of it, (b) because we have had voluntary marriage for thousands of years, (c) because we delayed marriage for at least a thousand if not three thousand years, (d) because we view our women as ‘prizes’ and a demonstration of wealth. (e) because we have rarely had strong states and the strong can make such demonstrations and not fear them being taken by warlords (f) because women have had PROPERTY RIGHTS in the west for over a thousand years. And because (g) we have always had a higher respect for women than other civilizations – its pretty clearly a genetic bias, and we dont know why yet.

    It’s not a mystery why cultures dress the way they do. It’s not simply fashion. It’s signaling. It always has been and always will be.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:01:00 UTC

  • If we can dumb down SAT tests to accommodate women, and if we can dumb down the

    If we can dumb down SAT tests to accommodate women, and if we can dumb down the courses in the classroom to accommodate women, and we can dumb down the courses in the university to accommodate women, why can’t we have separate classrooms, courses, and universities, for men?

    Why can’t we have equality of fulfillment?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:53:00 UTC

  • If men have to do the high risk and dirty jobs, work more hours, have a harder t

    If men have to do the high risk and dirty jobs, work more hours, have a harder time staying in the work force, fight in war, and die younger, or – pay high taxes for not doing so, then why can’t women have to produce children or pay taxes for not doing so? Women can’t fight (sorry it’s true), and men can’t bear children (self evident).

    I mean, why can’t we have equality?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:50:00 UTC

  • ( I leave political literature for you folks. I don’t do literature. I do scienc

    ( I leave political literature for you folks. I don’t do literature. I do science. Literature is largely propaganda. Institutions like law and money are a scientific problem. )

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:43:00 UTC

  • NEWBIES

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/FOR NEWBIES.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 23:56:00 UTC

  • I know that his is a falsehood, and was created as a falsehood. It’s like “Socia

    I know that his is a falsehood, and was created as a falsehood. It’s like “Social Justice” Its a nonsense word used to justify.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:21:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007905323237377

    Reply addressees: @wjfrisby

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713000913871499264

    IN REPLY TO:

    @wjfrisby

    @curtdoolittle It sounds as though you haven’t much time for a phrase such as “the greatest good of the greatest number”.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713000913871499264