Author: Curt Doolittle

  • ( Long day. In the center of L’viv. Everything is busy as heck tonight. Lots of

    ( Long day. In the center of L’viv. Everything is busy as heck tonight. Lots of happy people. BUT…. I have to find a brunette willing to give me hugs… let me see. I’m sure I can beg a hug off of someone. I will try to look charming, harmless, and pitiful. Maybe I will find a volunteer… I mean, it’s a matter of survival right? Who can live without hugs? I certainly can’t. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 15:00:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE MAY BE A FAILED STATE BUT NOT A FAILED PEOPLE You can’t fix south americ

    UKRAINE MAY BE A FAILED STATE BUT NOT A FAILED PEOPLE

    You can’t fix south america. you can’t fix the Arab world. These are failed peoples. They are failed peoples because they are so asymmetrically bottom weighted that it is not possible to construct formal institutions that produce a voluntary organization of production – there are too many dead weights. The only solution to governing bottom weighted populations, is rule of law, brutal, ruthless, fearsome suppression of corruption, and a total inability of the peasantry to gain access to political rents or subsidies.

    Democracy is a luxury good for the distribution of proceeds from a highly productive people who have themselves suppressed parasitism at all levels of society.

    Democracy is a reward for good behavior that was created by rule of law and careful breeding.

    But democracy in the absence of good behavior created by rule of law and careful breeding, is merely permission to engage in bad behavior, lack of rule of law, and careless breeding.

    There is nothing wrong with ukraine that young politicians, bureaucrats, and judges wouldn’t fix.

    But the solution is not democracy. It is rule of law and a constant propaganda drum of how to do the right thing, and turn in people doing the wrong thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 14:53:00 UTC

  • I am sorry but the creation of Microsoft’s female sin-bot is FREAKING AWESOME an

    I am sorry but the creation of Microsoft’s female sin-bot is FREAKING AWESOME and I bet they play it wrongly. Their PR is crap. This is an excellent opportunity to take center stage on the dialog on aritificial intelligence. Why can’t they? You know the answer…


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 14:38:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 12:40:00 UTC

  • In religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation, intentions are merely jus

    In religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation, intentions are merely justifications or deceits. It does not matter what one said, what a scripture says, what a law says, or what an investor pays for.

    All that matters is the outcome.

    If practice of your religion, philosophy, legislation, and speculation lead to sustainable intergenerational prosperity then it is true. otherwise it is false. There is no other test of religion, philosophy, legislation and speculation.

    This is very hard for humans to accept.

    But it is science.

    We do not describe imaginations.

    We describe reality.

    Because all else is error deceit and fraud.

    NO MORE LIES


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:36:00 UTC

  • ДЛЯ моих новых друзей Я пишу пишу в аналитической философии под названием Proper

    ДЛЯ моих новых друзей

    Я пишу пишу в аналитической философии под названием Propertarianism. Целью данного языка является создание свободной от ценностей (нейтральный) инструмент для общения концептуальных, поведенческих, этических, моральных, социальных, правовых, политических, экономических, и группа конкурентных стратегий.

    Другими словами Propertarianism является формальным языком социальной науки.

    Цель этого языка заключается как предотвратить большие политические ошибки, ложь и обманы, и, чтобы помочь нам понять наши чувства и идеи в научном плане.

    Когда пишу здесь, я очень часто говорят вещи, которые являются истинными, но мы не хотим, чтобы быть правдой. Причина заключается в том, что я хочу, чтобы исправить ошибки, ложь и обманы в озарений – все они, в каждой культуре, которая была преобразована просветления (науки).

    Моя цель LIBERTY

    Под «свободой» я имею в виду «выбор». Но выбор зависит от манеры, этики, морали и достоинства. Не выбор зависит от принятия от других.

    Мое решение ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВО РЫНОК

    Я против мажоритарного демократии. Но в пользу демократического производства обычных товаров и услуг – где граждане голосуют за достоянию, что они хотят, а не для коррумпированных политиков. Причины слишком сложны для этого поста. Но это не эмоциональный, но научная причина.

    НО ДЛЯ ПРАВИТЕЛЬСТВА РЫНКА НАМ НУЖНА ИСПЫТАНИЯ

    правдивости в области социальных наук

    Проблема в создании правительства, которое является честным, что мы не знаем, как проверить, если законы и законодательство были «истинно» и, следовательно, “научное”, и, следовательно, объективно этическим и моральным. Я произвел этот тест правдивости. Этот тест расширяет научный метод в социальных науках -И объединяет биологию, философию, мораль и право в единый логический метод. Этот метод называется «свидетельство истиной». И философия использования этого метода называется “testimonialism”. Слово для дачи показаний означает, что вы сделали экспертизу, чтобы убедиться, что вы говорили искренне (а не только честно), и что вы гарантия (гарантия), что вы сделали это усердие.

    Когда вы читаете или слышите мою критику – IT “S ВСЕГДА ПРОДЕМОНСТРИРУЙТЕ эти идеи.

    Все мои аргументы, так или иначе связаны с неспособностью просветления и неудач большинства демократии.

    Так что если я соблазняет вас Обратите внимание, что моя цель ОБИДЕТЬ ВАШ интуиций так что вы можете видеть возможность совсем другой мир.

    Тот, где правительства не могут участвовать в коррупции и обмана. Один, в котором мы производим общую собственность без представительных политических деятелей, открытых для коррупции.

    Я предпочитаю Критиковать OURSEVES. Причина, почему мы охотятся злые люди ЭТО ЧЕЛОВЕК В ЗЕРКАЛЕ НЕ завалили.

    С уважением

    Kypt Дулитл


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:23:00 UTC

  • FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO. The subject of my writing is an analytic

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS. THIS IS WHAT I DO.

    The subject of my writing is an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism, a tool for creating a value-free language for communicating conceptual, behavioral, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies. In other words, Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    Propertarianism is a way to say things which are true, but that many do not wish to be true. Every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science) embodying errors, lies and deceptions that I want to correct.

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’ — choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITARIAN democracy. But in favor of democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    MARKET GOVERNMENT NEEDS TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    DEMONSTRATION OF THESE IDEAS

    All of my arguments demonstrate the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    A world where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    WE NEED TO CRITICIZE OURSELVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle

    (edited by D Frank Robinson )

    ————————————-original prior to edits————–

    FOR MY NEW FRIENDS

    I write write in an analytic philosophy called Propertarianism. The purpose of this language is to create a value-free (neutral) tool for communicating conceptual, behavioral, ethical, moral, social, legal, political, economic, and group competitive strategies.

    In other words Propertarianism is a formal language of social science.

    The purpose of this language is to both prevent the great political errors, lies, and deceptions, and to help us understand our feelings and ideas in scientific terms.

    When write here I very often say things that are true, but that we do not wish to be true. The reason is that I want to correct the errors, lies, and deceptions of the enlightenments – all of them, in every culture that has been transformed by an enlightenment (science).

    MY GOAL IS LIBERTY

    By ‘liberty’ I mean ‘choice’. But choice dependent upon manners, ethics, morals, and merit. Not choice dependent upon taking from others.

    MY SOLUTION IS MARKET GOVERNMENT

    I am against MAJORITY democracy. But in favor of Democratic production of common goods and services – where citizens vote for the commons that they want, not for corrupt politicians. The reasons are too complex for this post. But it is not an emotional, but scientific reason.

    BUT FOR MARKET GOVERNMENT WE NEED TESTS OF TRUTHFULNESS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

    The problem in creating government that is honest is that we did not know how to test if laws and legislation were ‘true’ and therefore ‘scientific’, and therefore objectively ethical and moral. I produced this test of truthfulness. This test expands the scientific method into the social sciences -and unites biology, philosophy, morality and law into a single logical method. This method is called ‘testimonial truth’. And the philosophy of using this method is called ‘testimonialism’. The word to testify means that you have done diligence to ensure that you have spoken truthfully (not just honestly), and that you warranty (guarantee) that you have done that diligence.

    WHEN YOU READ OR HEAR MY CRITICISMS – IT”S ALWAYS TO DEMONSTRATE THESE IDEAS.

    All of my arguments are somehow connected with the failure of the enlightenment and the failures of majority democracy.

    SO IF I OFFEND YOU PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS MY PURPOSE TO OFFEND YOUR INTUITIONS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE POSSIBILITY OF A VERY DIFFERENT WORLD.

    One where governments are unable to engage in corruption and deceit. One in which we produce common property without representative politicians open to corruption.

    I PREFER TO CRITICiZE OURSEVES. THE REASON WE ARE PREYED UPON BY EVIL PEOPLE IS THE PERSON IN THE MIRROR HAS NOT STOPPED THEM.

    Sincerely

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 06:20:00 UTC

  • Islam was designed to provide a social structure for the intellectually limited

    Islam was designed to provide a social structure for the intellectually limited in a low trust civilization that could not be controlled by any other means thatn strict rules of observation – which is why the muslims always failed.

    They were little better than the mongols.

    The mongols had no writing ad could not produce a bureaucracy because of low trust.

    The Arabs had writing but could not produce a bureaucracy because of low trust.

    Religion is the most ‘base’ of social orders.

    Law the next

    Credit the next

    Truth the greatest.

    But it is only in retrospect this is obvious.

    #islam


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:57:00 UTC

  • Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience i

    Philosophy is largely a subject about that which we cannot directly experience in human nature, usually at scale.

    Finance like philosophy is a subject we cannot directly experience, but gives us facts about human nature at scale.

    There is a reason programmers and finance people think somewhat differently from engineers and physicists. Their subject is the mind of man, not the limits of the material universe.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 05:52:00 UTC

  • If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the

    If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the folly of our women, then what will we learn from this lesson?

    Our vanity.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:52:00 UTC