Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Materialism(actions), (Mature Adult – Evidence) .. vs idealism (words), (Moung a

    Materialism(actions), (Mature Adult – Evidence)
    .. vs idealism (words), (Moung adult – Rules)
    .. .. vs supernaturalism (Imagination), ( Child – Promises)

    Empathizing (feminine and Irresponsibile for Commons)
    vs Systematizing (masculine and Responsible for Commons)

    The math doesn’t work out in favor of anything other than realism, materialism, idealism, and imagination … IN THAT ORDER – unless we return to ignorance and poverty.

    Reply addressees: @robdodsonson


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 03:42:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742390896417447936

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742351732922097696

  • Yes. Well done

    Yes. Well done.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 03:38:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742389925436125583

    Reply addressees: @__Maneuver

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742355519480750210

  • You’re sister’s in bed already Jed. Don’t miss your chance

    You’re sister’s in bed already Jed. Don’t miss your chance.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 03:37:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742389753469710361

    Reply addressees: @Ozarker2023 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742372471502688660

  • NO RELIGION CAN HAVE IT ALL ONE WAY. Better to say that the feminine christianit

    NO RELIGION CAN HAVE IT ALL ONE WAY.
    Better to say that the feminine christianity and the masculine aristocracy and are both useful, because the minds of humans vary from feminine empathic neurotic needing social and emotional containment, to the masculine systematizing and… https://twitter.com/zarathustra5150/status/1742125441714954254


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 00:19:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742339844980789376

  • (Interstellar Travel) I don’t know the status of Denis Villeneuve’s take on Rend

    (Interstellar Travel)
    I don’t know the status of Denis Villeneuve’s take on Rendevous with Rama, but I hope it makes it to the screen, because that’s the only way humans rather than androids are gonna make it to other stars and planets. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 00:14:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742338629111030001

  • Pretty much

    Pretty much.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 00:12:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742338016637604305

    Reply addressees: @The_Phil_King

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742332358454571156

  • “The rights failure to accomplish anything has the appearance to me to be part o

    –“The rights failure to accomplish anything has the appearance to me to be part of a plan.”–

    Lets talk about what the right fails.

    This statement implying inentionality, demonstrates that while feminine minds who don’t understand the rational incentives at play see either irrational instinct or oppression in everything, the opposite is also true in masculine minds who find intentional conspiracy when mere rational incentives or mere instincts are at play.

    So the failure of the right to accomplish anything isn’t a plan. Instead, there are at least the following reasons:

    (a) Christianity is hopeful and tolerant, and christian conservatives had confidence (faith?) that progressives and leftists (mostly women) wouldd ‘learn’ as they gained experience. But this didn’t happen.

    Instead that christian dominance of conservatism became self destructive once the left ended meritocratic participation in government by people with real world experience managing the spectrum of humans – especially by the military and industry – and replaced them with ‘credentialists’ without experience managing real people at any scale, led to ‘the managerial state’ by inexperienced credentialists operating on philosophy and ideology and not evidence and experience.

    (b) elections are decided by women, and the increasing numbrer of young, unmarried, unmarried with children, has led to the attempt to make the state responsible for that which must be the resonsibiilty of famiilies – and vote emotionally and intuitionistically accordingly. Combine that with the fact that colleges and universities are teaching a secular theological religion on the marxist spectrum that (as women do) blames everyone else for conditions, so they undermine and self congradulate.

    (c) Most of all, conservatism it’s a masculine trait. Conservatism is as much a masculine trait as systematizing responsibility and capital seeking and disagreeableness. So the right (masculine) tends to fracture into highly devoted, systematic (religion(social), philosophy(personal), practicality-class (economic), ideology(political)) where they can develop leaders and competency. This is what produces the libertarian to authoritarian spectrum. (packs)

    The left doesn’t require systematic anything other than emotional convergence in the moment seizing every opportunity for icremental gain (herds).

    So the conservatives work by cliff events, under leaders and causes that are hyper activiated to act during that cliff event (warfare) – enough to overcome their cognitive siloing.

    Where the progressive (feminine, left) works as do women, by seeking to exploit all incremental opportunities at all times (undermining) because there is no cognitive siloing to overcome.

    (d) First, y’all don’t donate money to any cause that would advance your interests. Second, when you do give attention or money you do so with outliers (losers) with no chance of victory. Third, becaues of your secarianism you ask for ends that are not a compromise position but an extreme, guarranteeing you’ll fail. Fourth, yall don’t think in terms of delivering solutions – because the right (except for a very small number of us) is anti-intellectual and impulsive. Fifth, and most importatly, you sit at home watching in large numbers as some minority of better men pay the cost and risk of showing up.

    So my ‘paternal’ advice is look in the mirror. Unless you do the following you’re the rieason teh right loses:
    1. donate to what has a chance
    2. learn from and promote those who have a chance
    3. seek compromise positions that all ‘sects’ of the masculine spectrum can tolerate (priority of thefamily) – and don’t try to solve everything at once – choose to move the needlee and keep at it like the left.
    4. Seek actionable solutions that produce incentives to act responsibiliy rather than that others agree with your values and your ideas.
    5. Show up. Y’all never show up. We need 2M men, in DC, for a minimu of three weeks to win. Y’all wiath for other men to do the work for you, pay the cost for you, and take the risk for you. … And that mean’s you’re boys not men.

    Love you all anyway
    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @betterbuiltpool @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 23:19:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742324688729108480

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742310322508116133

  • RT @NatLawInstitute: @SamW_NGC @BlameMaxSand @curtdoolittle @rumblevideo Our con

    RT @NatLawInstitute: @SamW_NGC @BlameMaxSand @curtdoolittle @rumblevideo Our content is mirrored on Odysee. https://odysee.com/@naturallawinstitute:c


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 22:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742318886471496009

  • That’s interesting because every sect says the same thing of every other sect. I

    That’s interesting because every sect says the same thing of every other sect. In particular large numbers of protestants claim catholics aren’t christians. Or those christians that are spiritual or traditional but no theological in their disposition.

    Unfortunately you aren’t the arbiter of what constitutes christianity any more than any other person. Instead christianity like all other religions is disambiguated from others by what religions they are not. And that is a relatively simple task. πŸ˜‰

    Furthermore given that christianity is a personal religion with low standards of testable conformance in behavior, then one of the benefits of chritsianity is “it is whatever I myself and my sect understand it to be.”

    For the rest of us christians demonstrate similar moral ethical and normative behaviors that differe from those who were raised (indoctrinated) into different cultures with different religions.

    You may think it matters what you think. But others only care about your demonstrated behavior. And you are judged in this world, and reap rewards, nothings, and punishments in this world by your actions, not your ‘beliefs’.

    Reply addressees: @JMh12061951


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 22:55:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742318664290844672

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742313511735243199

  • Thank you sam. I’ll have the folks set that up. πŸ˜‰

    Thank you sam. I’ll have the folks set that up. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 22:47:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742316730607665658

    Reply addressees: @SamW_NGC @NatLawInstitute @BlameMaxSand @rumblevideo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742316187936309548