Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @riboster @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne Good thinking. We c

    RT @curtdoolittle: @riboster @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne Good thinking.
    We can actually fix this problem and most of my work (and our o…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:10:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744361011744747579

  • Good thinking. We can actually fix this problem and most of my work (and our org

    Good thinking.
    We can actually fix this problem and most of my work (and our organization’s work) is reducible to fixing this problem in our constitution, and as a consequence the constitutions of all other western countries.
    I can’t take time to explain it all now or even part of it but if I told you that there are about eight holes in our constitution that if filled would correct our law, so that the false promise (fraud) and undermining (sedition) of the left, using the abrahamic(feminine) method of warfare can be stopped and purged from our society like the cancerous religion that it is – that’s all it would take, and the market for purging people and forever suppressing a repetition would do the job we want it to.
    However to impose those reforms is going to take 2M men in DC (or london, or paris, or Berlin, or Rome…) for three weeks to three months, and a voluntary organization (like we had in Maydan in Ukraine) that is responsible for getting food, water, and other supplies to those people.

    Reply addressees: @riboster @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:10:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744360975703130113

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744359496636416263

  • Correct. Urban city states and suburban and rural territorial states. For the si

    Correct. Urban city states and suburban and rural territorial states. For the simple reason that they have opposing interests in the rules of the commons because they are polar opposites in opportunity costs and responsibility for commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:02:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744358974391042465

    Reply addressees: @ShorterboyMs @JDPARIZEE70

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744304427270648192

  • (I’d just like to thank the participants in this thread for decent and honest in

    (I’d just like to thank the participants in this thread for decent and honest intellectual discourse that is so rare. It’s so inspiring when you find people who actually think about hard problems. thanks all.) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:01:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744358723278065832

    Reply addressees: @Zamicol @LiminalRev @RussellJohnston @cryptogeni

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744323384442278078

  • I’ve done a revolution. It didn’t take long. Even in the states, the USG gave in

    I’ve done a revolution. It didn’t take long. Even in the states, the USG gave in after only three weeks in the sixties. Just FYI, the moment they fire on you, you win, and they’re done. However, this means your set of demands must be in the interest of all at the expense of the credentialed class in media, academy, and state.
    I am farily certain if our organization hadn’t been rushed in 20 would could have had the ball rolling, but that was a gamble we took. And hence why I’ve h ad the FBI in my kitchen multiple times for many hours of discussion (and threats.)

    Reply addressees: @riboster @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 14:00:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744358378053173248

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744357243225829598

  • It’s unlikely you’d disagree if I demonstrated the issues clearly but if you are

    It’s unlikely you’d disagree if I demonstrated the issues clearly but if you are not relatively deep in these subjects (extraordinarily deep really) then it’s more a matter of talking past you for that reason. And it’s completely understandable. 😉 This is not exactly intuitive…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:57:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744357590706827336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744355331151430128

  • hugs. 😉

    hugs. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:40:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744353468259693047

    Reply addressees: @AbleDParyon @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744351700830269573

  • I suppose I should help clarify the subject by disambiguating terms. Calculation

    I suppose I should help clarify the subject by disambiguating terms.

    Calculation in the broadest sense consists of the transformation of inputs into outputs. This is a process of deduction. (top down) Mathematics is Calculation.

    Computation in the broadest sense is the performance of operations. (bottom up) in the absence of deduction, induction, or inference. Arithimetic is computation.

    Probability, in now-popular AI, this difference is now re-conflated and restored to ambiguity because our computers, perform computations, using human-derived calculations, to produce bayesian accounting probabilities, as if they were inferences, because the number of dimensions of measurement and number paramaters exceed the human ability to calculate, in the category we call artificial intelligence. And since all langauge is reducible to measurements, where the measurement consists of a dimension that is subjectively testable by human experience, while still retaining it’s reducability to mathematical expression by substitution of arbitrary numbers as names and values as weights instead of natural naming (vs cardinal or ordinal).

    Machines cannot perform mathematics however, they may perform computations, and therefore may perform arithmetic. Even though, as painful as it is, division is still a matter of tabular trial and error. Just as so much of mathematics is a matter of ‘fitting’.

    I find math boring but I find the foundations of math, logic, and all the grammars (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) fascinating. 😉

    Reply addressees: @Zamicol @cryptogeni


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:40:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744353353725816832

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744169409831145592


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    THE GODEL NONSENSE IS AN INTERGENERATIONAL INFECTION. 😉
    –“There’s no proof that everything is computable. Information theory is in agreement with Gödel.”– Replying to @Zamicol and @cryptogeni

    That is a naive statement. You are confusing the limits of mathematics with the limits of computation and not grasping computation as a sequence of possible operations. The fact is if the universe can construct anything at all – if ANYTHING can exist, then it is computable because there is no difference between computation and construction by permutation.

    The difference is that mathematics is universally statistical (categorical) so that we can predict what is mathematically reducible, and that is only a subset of what is computable. The problem with computability is that there is no means of prediction – there is only a means of trial and error.

    You also misunderstand Godel. The point is that not everything is provable because there is no closure to computability, and provability is a statement about logic given a set of fixed premises and not about existential possibility. Furthermore, the proof appears to be limited to arithmetical operations and nothing more complicated.

    It appears you also misunderstand information theory given that the purpose of the theory is to explain the problem of entropy and noice precisely because of the information loss in mathematical (verbal, ideal) reduction vs computational (operational,real) procedures is due precisely to the fact that mathematics loses information and computation doesn’t (at least down to -35 decimal places).

    I did not realize until the early nineties that this false understanding of Godel was spreading like a virus with each new generation of students learning programming – but who have no basic comprehension of its narrowness. However, there are authors who have written books, one in particular that I can’t recall off the top of my head, that I felt was largely accessible to the STEM degree-educated population.

    I hope this helps you at least head in the right direction.
    Let me know if you require further explanation.

    Cheers

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1744169409831145592

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne The fact that Putin (rather t

    RT @curtdoolittle: @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the Western ri…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:25:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744349719298478100

  • The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the We

    The fact that Putin (rather the Chinese, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and the Western right) are correct on culture and genetics is not the same as correct on government and economy. The only reason russia is a decaying drunken tubercular population collapse instead of as wealthy as norway is the Putin Regime’s attempt to restore the soviet union and russian empire, and this massive corrupt kleptocracy that drains every locale to keep Moscow and St Petersburg from rebellion.

    I’ve tried to buy companies in Russia. It’s impossible. They have three sets of books. And the moment you make any money at all the corruption mafia steps in to milk it, and if you’re somehow successful they simply use art and artifice to take it from you. Russians are still serfs.

    So would you rather blame yourself for not taking to the streets in large numbers to end the cultural-marxist, sex-marxist, and race-marxist abrahamic warfare against our people via the credentialists, when that is possible, or blame yourself for the incapacity to overthrow a government happy to use violence against the people?

    The fact that people are lazy and cowardly on the right, is different from whether the alternatives to our economy and rule of law are even worse.

    We can fix the crisis, even if it requires mass deportation (repatriation), and a purge of academy, media, and state. But putin’s cabal is far worse than the system we have now.

    It is in the nature of the disenfranchised masculine right to want simple and quick answers to hard problems, but that is exactly why the left wins: because they simply keep the pressure on (they’re cognitively feminine and use the female method of warfare by sedition) and incrementally work toward their ends.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @artus9010 @AEemus @dr_duchesne


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 13:24:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744349470471430144

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744280898218959246