SMART. NURTURE VS JUSTICE
(this is very close to my understanding)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7oUEQi-q-k&
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 07:41:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744987881611882568
Author: Curt Doolittle
-
SMART. NURTURE VS JUSTICE (this is very close to my understanding)
-
No. Just haven’t done the transcripts yet. 😉
No. Just haven’t done the transcripts yet. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 07:39:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744987224540602440
Reply addressees: @adominguez792
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744952167809650997
-
The Brutal Science of Our Natural Law Formulation Where the previous milennias a
The Brutal Science of Our Natural Law Formulation
Where the previous milennias asked this question:
–“To summarize: Classical natural law theory can be understood as a commitment to the following two claims: (1) Moral validity is a logically necessary condition for legal validity—an unjust or immoral law being no law at all; and (2) The moral order is a part of the natural order-moral duties being in some sense ”read off” from essences or purposes fixed (perhaps by God) in nature.”–
Instead, our construction is quite simple:
The only reason for I and mine not to kill you and take your Stuff, is if there is more utility than doing so. And the only means of obtaining that utility is cooperation. And the terms of that cooperation are reciprocal insurance of self determination by self determined means in the form of sovereignty in demonstrated interest and reciprocity in display word and deed. Only then does a ‘we’ exist, instead of an ‘I’. In other worse, this is the means by which commons are produced, and commons are a multiplier, and it is commons that defend us against the dark forces of time, nature, man, and ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 07:34:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744986131836403712
-
(Love you man. 😉 But look how far you have come. I can see it. You must feel it
(Love you man. 😉 But look how far you have come. I can see it. You must feel it.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 04:53:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744945650045685927
Reply addressees: @partymember55 @pdbanalysts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744909011701338557
-
@BrandNewVow – follow me and you’ll quickly grasp the fully science of sex diffe
@BrandNewVow – follow me and you’ll quickly grasp the fully science of sex differences in sensation, perception, valuation, cognition, bias, truth … and most importantly, deceit.
While I consider it a minor property of my work, it is the topic that most people find the most relevant to the present condition.
And from that undersetanding you’ll learn that there is no substantive problem with our civilization – it’s a problem with our women….Reply addressees: @JaredAberach @BrandNewVow @hollowearthterf
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 04:52:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744945384621842432
-
(NLI Team Update) I’ve cut the volume ‘the philosophy’ from the work scope. Afte
(NLI Team Update)
I’ve cut the volume ‘the philosophy’ from the work scope. After reviewing how to reorganize the content, it appears that the progress we’ve made in the science has deprecated most of the content in the philosophy. So an attempt to use it for a ‘simple version’ is pointless.
The constitution as we are writing it, effectively includes every concept in the philosophy, by the simple fact that we have included the intital articles of the natural law in the strict construction of the constitution from natural law.
As much as it’s painful for those who are invested in it to hear it is pretty clear that philosophy in the sense it has been practiced is not only fully demarcated from the completion of the sciences by their unification, and relegated to systems of decidabilty within that science for the purpose of simplifying decisions in order to bring about desired ends.
Again, as often as possible, I want to thank the team and of course the fleet of doctors, for dragging me back into the competency to return to work and to operate at my previous levels of ability. I am almost there. And I wouldn’t be if it werent for the tribe of people that make up our organization.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 04:50:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744944771787825152
-
(Smart, Well done.)
(Smart, Well done.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 23:36:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744865852485255595
Reply addressees: @AhmedAlmahdie
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744853900149026950
-
“Hamid al-Ghazali (1058-1111) completed the demolition of reason which his maste
–“Hamid al-Ghazali (1058-1111) completed the demolition of reason which his master began by claiming that “nothing in nature can act spontaneously and apart from God.” After abolishing secondary causality and a universe saturated in Logos [laws of nature ascertainable by reason], al-Ghazali put will in their place, claiming that will precedes knowledge.”–
And thereby depriving muslims of responsibility for anything other than obedience in ignorance.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 22:30:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744849032688672768
-
Why Islam vs Christianity? This series of passages is reducible to the incapacit
Why Islam vs Christianity?
This series of passages is reducible to the incapacity of the south eurasian peoples to grasp abstractions – whether egyptian stagnation, mesopotamian, levantine, arab, or the eventual muslim. Even the minds of the persians could not defeat the incapacity of the minds of their neighbors.
–“Like the dogs Heraclitus mentioned in one of his aphorisms, the Arabs barked at what they did not understand.”–
Now, if we grasp that (a) a population’s strategy, metaphysics, myths, rituals, grammars (logics), traditions, values, norms, and habits must satisfy the median of the distribution given that two thirds of the population is only capable of such limits, and far more are capable of nothing but imitation at the bottom. And (b) logical facility degrades rapidly under 105, especially in a population where the IQ is 83, combined with tribalism and illiteracy. Of course they are not able to grasp and institutionalize abstractions without high investment parenting and high investment education – and even then, the percentage of the population capable of such reasoning is limted in relation to the rest.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 22:05:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744842889463574528
-
The window is in sight of more of the population every day. We probably don’t ge
The window is in sight of more of the population every day.
We probably don’t get many chances so timing matters. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 21:58:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744841132889010516
Reply addressees: @drmiller1960
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744836173392924893