Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Typos” 109 explosions => 109 expulsions optimistic as hour hight trust => as our

    Typos”
    109 explosions => 109 expulsions
    optimistic as hour hight trust => as our high trust
    industrialize liying sedition => industrialize lying sedition


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:43:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750952704724070804

    Reply addressees: @AndrewJV123 @auny_marie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750948669489094969


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    ANTI-ISRAEL? WHY NOT PRO ISRAEL?
    Hmmm… Support them there so they go there? If you don’t support them there, more will come to you? While there are only 6-7M Jews in israel, there are about the same number 6.3M in the USA. And smaller numbers in France (440,000), Canada (398,000), the United Kingdom (312,000), Argentina (171,000), Russia (132,000), Germany (125,000), and Australia (117,200). So under 2M outside of Israel and the USA. They are only safe in the anglosphere and broader germanosphere at present it seems.

    Conversely, israel, with a population of an additional eight millon, jews, totalling under 15M, would approximate the population of the Netherlands, and it’s per capita GDP of 50k, and total economy of 1T. This would have (and have to have) an extraordinarily positive strategic, economic, educational, and eventually cultural impact on the middle east, assisting them in their slow ascent out of supernatural m aysticism ignorance, mandated non-education, and economic subsistence without the oil revenues.

    WHAT ABOUT THE NEGATIVE EFFECT OF JEWS IN THE WEST?
    Of course we could just make a few adjustments in our laws to prevent baiting into hazard, privatizing gains and socializing losses.

    And we could outlaw sedition using the female to feminine to abrahamic-to-marxist sequence – so that we we equally suppressed feminine jewish abrahamic marxist antisocial behavior. Because feminine behavior is genetic, instinctual, and all but unsuppressable, especially their antisocial behavior.

    And we could return all credit expansion to the treasury and end the coercive and rent seeking power of the private financial sector, and vastly increase the treasury without increased taxation – perhaps even replacing taxation.

    And of course (my) our organization has prepared all that constitutional law as permanent amendments. So it’s easily done.

    And then it wouldn’t matter that jewish group evolutionary strategy, jewish instinct, and jewish culture was just the expression of female sedition against males by means of seduction into baiting into hazard and subsequent rent seeking, instead of earnings from production and reciprocal exchange free of negative externalities. πŸ˜‰

    But then as usual I’m probably talking over heads…. Hopefully someone catches on, a little at a time. πŸ˜‰

    We dont need to keep adding to the list of 109 explosions and we don’t need any more violence. We only need to domesticate women and jews, just as we have domesticated other groups in europe, on group, one class at a time. It’s just that women and jews together during teh 20th were a bit much when we were christian conservatives and foolishly optimistic as hour hight trust society and culture teach us… despite that it’s also a vulnerability as well as a benefit.z

    Codify the feminie-jewish-abrahamic- marxist sequence as what it is: crime. And institutionalize it in our legal code. And purge that behavior from our polities forever, just as we have incrementally purged all other antisocial behavior.

    Because male antisocial behavior is more obvious and urgent we acted on it first. But now that we can industrialize liying sedition and rent seeking and parasitism through indirect institutional means we must also suppress the feminine as thoroughly as we have suppressed the masculine.

    From my standpoint I see women and jews as an asset just as I see other europeans as an asset or all higher performing people as an asset. The difference is we did not force jewish integration and they instead undermined our demand for integration and the consequence has been horrific. That said, ‘fixing’ the problem of the feminine isn’t that difficult as I’ve roughly outlined above. So why not preserve the asset even if there is a short term cost to it. And even if we should have made this legal change already regarding women independent of the jewish baiting of women into their strategy of sedition.

    Of course it takes political power to do so and that might men we cannot do so democratically, but must do so responsibly by ‘other means”.

    With humor and affection
    By painful truth regardless
    For the betterment of all

    C Doolittle

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1750948669489094969

  • Typos” 109 explosions => 109 expulsions optimistic as hour hight trust => as our

    Typos”
    109 explosions => 109 expulsions
    optimistic as hour hight trust => as our high trust
    industrialize liying sedition => industrialize lying sedition


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:43:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750952704661229568

  • I live to serve. πŸ˜‰

    I live to serve. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:39:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750951558471122983

    Reply addressees: @AndrewJV123 @auny_marie

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750951300890575120

  • THE LEFT WAS WRONG – WE DIVERGED – BUT THEN OVER TIME THE LEFT IS ALWAYS WRONG.

    THE LEFT WAS WRONG – WE DIVERGED – BUT THEN OVER TIME THE LEFT IS ALWAYS WRONG.
    Feminine intuition doesn’t scale.
    @ScottAdamsSays

    Of course.
    (a) The left assumed we would converge – the left is feminine, It cannot imagine anything violating feminine solipsism.
    (b) However we (the sexes) have diverged – not really. The feminine have diverged from the masculine, just as the left has diverged from the center, while the right has barely moved.
    (c) Because we no longer have a need to compromise with one another
    (d) Because while we remain reproductively dependent we are no longer economically socially and politically dependent.
    (e) Because it is possible to externalize our intertemporal costs to others in the polity through taxes and redistribution without family formation and intergenerational production of population.

    So yeah. Men and women will continue to diverge, populations will continue to crash, until we restore the necessity of production of families in order to obtain the benefits of modern institutions of insurance at scale.

    So yeah.
    It’s just science.
    The science of incentives.
    But god forbid the left accept science if it conflicts with their genetic predisposition to solipsism and feminine rent seeking, baiting into hazard, free riding, in pursuit of unearned hyperconsumption. πŸ˜‰

    They’re just women, and women are just sexually mature children – they never mature beyond the self and the empathizable. It a takes men longer to mature because men mature more – across time and space. So get over it and do something about it. πŸ˜‰

    Men have to be responsible beyond the empathic into the systemic because only men are capable of responsibility both instinctually, intuitively, emotionally, cognitively, and intellectually with sufficiency to organize polities that don’t collapse from feminine irresponsible hyperconsumption the absence of production of offspring.

    Cheers
    -cd

    Reply addressees: @y_gebregiorgis @ch35614


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:39:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750951491051966464

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750944576041287969

  • ANTI-ISRAEL? WHY NOT PRO ISRAEL? Hmmm… Support them there so they go there? If

    ANTI-ISRAEL? WHY NOT PRO ISRAEL?
    Hmmm… Support them there so they go there? If you don’t support them there, more will come to you? While there are only 6-7M Jews in israel, there are about the same number 6.3M in the USA. And smaller numbers in France (440,000), Canada (398,000), the United Kingdom (312,000), Argentina (171,000), Russia (132,000), Germany (125,000), and Australia (117,200). So under 2M outside of Israel and the USA. They are only safe in the anglosphere and broader germanosphere at present it seems.

    Conversely, israel, with a population of an additional eight millon, jews, totalling under 15M, would approximate the population of the Netherlands, and it’s per capita GDP of 50k, and total economy of 1T. This would have (and have to have) an extraordinarily positive strategic, economic, educational, and eventually cultural impact on the middle east, assisting them in their slow ascent out of supernatural m aysticism ignorance, mandated non-education, and economic subsistence without the oil revenues.

    WHAT ABOUT THE NEGATIVE EFFECT OF JEWS IN THE WEST?
    Of course we could just make a few adjustments in our laws to prevent baiting into hazard, privatizing gains and socializing losses.

    And we could outlaw sedition using the female to feminine to abrahamic-to-marxist sequence – so that we we equally suppressed feminine jewish abrahamic marxist antisocial behavior. Because feminine behavior is genetic, instinctual, and all but unsuppressable, especially their antisocial behavior.

    And we could return all credit expansion to the treasury and end the coercive and rent seeking power of the private financial sector, and vastly increase the treasury without increased taxation – perhaps even replacing taxation.

    And of course (my) our organization has prepared all that constitutional law as permanent amendments. So it’s easily done.

    And then it wouldn’t matter that jewish group evolutionary strategy, jewish instinct, and jewish culture was just the expression of female sedition against males by means of seduction into baiting into hazard and subsequent rent seeking, instead of earnings from production and reciprocal exchange free of negative externalities. πŸ˜‰

    But then as usual I’m probably talking over heads…. Hopefully someone catches on, a little at a time. πŸ˜‰

    We dont need to keep adding to the list of 109 explosions and we don’t need any more violence. We only need to domesticate women and jews, just as we have domesticated other groups in europe, on group, one class at a time. It’s just that women and jews together during teh 20th were a bit much when we were christian conservatives and foolishly optimistic as hour hight trust society and culture teach us… despite that it’s also a vulnerability as well as a benefit.z

    Codify the feminie-jewish-abrahamic- marxist sequence as what it is: crime. And institutionalize it in our legal code. And purge that behavior from our polities forever, just as we have incrementally purged all other antisocial behavior.

    Because male antisocial behavior is more obvious and urgent we acted on it first. But now that we can industrialize liying sedition and rent seeking and parasitism through indirect institutional means we must also suppress the feminine as thoroughly as we have suppressed the masculine.

    From my standpoint I see women and jews as an asset just as I see other europeans as an asset or all higher performing people as an asset. The difference is we did not force jewish integration and they instead undermined our demand for integration and the consequence has been horrific. That said, ‘fixing’ the problem of the feminine isn’t that difficult as I’ve roughly outlined above. So why not preserve the asset even if there is a short term cost to it. And even if we should have made this legal change already regarding women independent of the jewish baiting of women into their strategy of sedition.

    Of course it takes political power to do so and that might men we cannot do so democratically, but must do so responsibly by ‘other means”.

    With humor and affection
    By painful truth regardless
    For the betterment of all

    C Doolittle

    Reply addressees: @AndrewJV123 @auny_marie


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:27:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750948669099020289

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750936151903363317

  • Attention in the absence of children is an addiction for women as much as power

    Attention in the absence of children is an addiction for women as much as power in the absence of responsibility is for men.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 18:01:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750941970011205779

    Reply addressees: @dr_duchesne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750940407423287669

  • FIVE POSTS FOR THE STEW PETERS SHOW On the Supreme Court and Trump Stew Peters (

    FIVE POSTS FOR THE STEW PETERS SHOW
    On the Supreme Court and Trump
    Stew Peters (@RealStewPeters) on Twitter
    https://stewpeters.com/

    1. What’s the Supreme Court Going to Decide Regarding Trump on The Ballot?
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1738261136829497454

    2. How the Supreme Court Will Decide β€œTrump on…

  • FIVE POSTS FOR THE STEW PETERS SHOW On the Supreme Court and Trump Stew Peters (

    FIVE POSTS FOR THE STEW PETERS SHOW
    On the Supreme Court and Trump
    Stew Peters (@RealStewPeters) on Twitter
    https://t.co/nAYmaiRMCf

    1. What’s the Supreme Court Going to Decide Regarding Trump on The Ballot?
    https://t.co/0VHIVcA7kj

    2. How the Supreme Court Will Decide β€œTrump on The Ballot”.
    https://t.co/F8c7RUcNwJ

    3. What Does Settled Law Mean in The Context of Trump Et Al?
    https://t.co/WTyoSCtWWW

    4. Present Issues: Trump Candidacy and The Chevron Defense
    https://t.co/WTyoSCtWWW

    5. How Our Lower Courts Create False Positives That Confuse the Public
    https://t.co/mDdYgiu5Yf

    Find me here on twitter at @curtdoolittle
    or at the Natural Law Institute on the web:
    https://t.co/sczfFL1Pns

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 17:58:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750941269390483457

  • (^Careful. That will get you banned. Don’t threaten, doxx, or pursue doxxing. No

    (^Careful. That will get you banned. Don’t threaten, doxx, or pursue doxxing. No matter how much the person deserves it. πŸ˜‰ )


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 17:51:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750939446860529809

    Reply addressees: @Based_Luna @kevstyluss @dp9qkbmztp @JenniferBrett15 @ryan_ut21 @HTTP_Lovecraft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750939068891078970

  • In the sense that it’s masculine in the sense that it’s capitalizing and respons

    In the sense that it’s masculine in the sense that it’s capitalizing and responsible yes. But I do catch your meaning.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 17:49:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750939038259843511

    Reply addressees: @ch35614

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750936771729457294