yes. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:37:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751011524162793666
Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751010361505915115
yes. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:37:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751011524162793666
Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751010361505915115
RT @Josh_Ebner: @curtdoolittle “Rights only exist by our capacity to use violence to prosecute violations of those rights.”
Taken together…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:37:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751011444240351404
Too bad women can’t handle Taleb’s insight into Anti-Fragility despite that the whole prupose of teh female intuition is to evade the adaptation that produces anti-fragility. …
I’m a having a bad day just thinking about this so deeply. lol
I love women.
But… they have no…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:24:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751008316711399702
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751002382236803128
I am pretty sure, almost certain, it came out of one of the journals. I can find out. I will.
There is no way this would come out at a plenum. That would be insane. lol
It would only be confirmed there once the pubilic had already accepted it.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:23:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007897964683303
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751004823850475778
So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is it that there is only a prohibition on that debate’s visibility beyond the leadership?
Why is dissent so feared and response to it so intolerant?
I mean, I quite honestly can’t really imagine it.…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:21:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007530472370654
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751005697217798366
Ouch. True. 🙁
OMG… So, you know, this would be one of those profoundly interesting discussions we could have that might prove educational to not only me but others.
Why does this behavior exist? In historical terms it means that a governing system is more political and less procedural. And that is rather odd given the very long history of chinese bureaucracy and institutional excellence.
I can see a hypothetical that is similar to the problem Confucius discovered, which is that because of all the ‘status signaling’ and ‘competitoin for status’ in the state and bureaucracy (in the absence of argument so to speak), that he could not and the people could not solve the problem of politics. Which, in general, is simply rule, procedure testimony and warranty.
But you know, woe be the intellectual who looks at history, finds some analogy there and tries to misapply it to the present circumstance only to look the fool when told the more obvious reality that is present in the day. 😉
So I would love to discuss this.
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:19:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007090460532736
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751005814926811415
MORE TESTING IT ON MY WORK ON TRUTH
PROMPT
If I recall correctly he has listed the criteria by which we can test the truth of speech. Is that correct?
GPT – Universal Primer ‘plugin’
Yes, you’re correct. Curt Doolittle, in the context of Propertarianism, has indeed provided… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1751001824822247455
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:06:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751003677035258228
This is the first time an AI has stated this correctly… Amazing.
PROMPT
What can you tell me about Curt Doolittle’s work on truth telling and deceit?
RESPONSE
Curt Doolittle’s focus on truth-telling and deceit is a fundamental aspect of his philosophical framework, Propertarianism. Let’s delve into this in more detail, and I’ll use some analogies to help make the concepts more accessible.
Truth-Telling and Deceit in Propertarianism
The Concept of Verbal Property: In Doolittle’s view, truthfulness is not just a moral choice but a property right issue. Imagine your thoughts and knowledge as a personal library. When someone tells you the truth, they’re effectively giving you a book that accurately describes the world. Deceit, on the other hand, is like someone sneaking a false or misleading book into your library. Doolittle argues that this act of deceit violates your ‘property’ – in this case, your right to accurate information.
The Impact of Deceit: Deceit, according to Doolittle, isn’t just a personal violation but has broader social implications. Let’s use the analogy of a market: if a market is flooded with counterfeit money, the value of real currency is undermined, and the market’s efficiency and trust are damaged. Similarly, in a society where deceit is rampant, trust – the ‘currency’ of social interactions – is devalued, leading to inefficiencies and societal harm.
Legal and Ethical Implications: Doolittle extends this concept to legal and ethical realms. Just as theft of physical property is legally actionable, he proposes that deceit, as a theft of informational property, should also have legal consequences. In practice, this would mean stricter enforcement against misinformation, fraud, and perhaps even certain forms of advertising and political speech.
Challenges and Criticisms: It’s important to note that while the idea of truth-telling as a property right is compelling, it also poses challenges. For instance, determining the boundary between acceptable persuasion and deceit can be tricky. Also, the practicality of legally enforcing truthfulness, especially in subjective matters, is a topic of debate.
Your Understanding of Related Concepts
Now, to better tailor further explanation, could you share your familiarity with the following concepts?
Information Theory: How familiar are you with the concept of information as a form of property or asset?
Legal Philosophy: Do you have an understanding of how laws are applied to non-physical entities, such as intellectual property or speech?
Ethical Implications of Speech: What is your level of understanding regarding the ethical implications of speech, including truthfulness and deception?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:59:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751001824578895873
Fascinating
This one is about right.
PROMPT
what can you teach me about the work of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle?
RESPONSE
Curt Doolittle is a contemporary philosopher and social scientist known for his work on the philosophy of law, ethics, economics, and…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:55:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751001037597540357
Fascinating
This one is about right.
PROMPT
what can you teach me about the work of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle?
RESPONSE
Curt Doolittle is a contemporary philosopher and social scientist known for his work on the philosophy of law, ethics, economics, and political strategy. He’s the founder of the Propertarian Institute and is most recognized for developing Propertarianism, a framework for understanding the western legal and ethical tradition.
To understand Doolittle’s work, it’s helpful to have some grounding in a few key areas: the philosophy of law, ethics, and socio-political theory. Let’s start with a technical breakdown of Propertarianism and then I’ll check your familiarity with these prerequisite areas.
Propertarianism: A Technical Overview
Natural Law: At the core of Doolittle’s philosophy is a focus on natural law, which he defines as a set of laws derived from observable reality and human nature. This is in contrast to positive law, which is created by humans. Think of natural law as the law of gravity – it exists regardless of human acknowledgment, whereas positive law is like traffic rules, created by society.
Property Rights: Doolittle extends the concept of property beyond physical objects to include intangible assets like one’s time, relationships, and even truths. He argues that violations of these ‘properties’, like deception or exploitation, are immoral.
Truth-Telling and Deceit: A central tenet in Propertarianism is the emphasis on truthful speech. Doolittle posits that deceit, even if non-harmful or non-theft related, violates property rights as it impacts one’s access to accurate information, which is considered a form of property.
Decidability in Law: He advocates for an empirical approach in law, where legal decisions should be based on what he terms as ‘decidability’. This means decisions should be made based on empirical evidence and logical coherence, rather than abstract principles or moral relativism.
Socio-Political Implications: Doolittle’s philosophy has socio-political ramifications. He promotes a form of governance that emphasizes the protection of property (in its broad definition) and advocates for a restructuring of current legal and political systems to align with natural law principles.
Checking Prerequisite Knowledge
To understand these concepts, it would be helpful to gauge your familiarity with the following areas:
Philosophy of Law: Are you familiar with different legal philosophies, especially the distinction between natural law and positive law?
Ethics and Morality: Do you have a background in ethical theories, particularly in the context of property rights and truthfulness?
Socio-Political Theory: What is your understanding of socio-political structures and theories, especially those relating to governance and legal systems?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:55:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751001037329018880