Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @X_Filosofo @AshaLogos @sovereignbrah All religions fail, and

    RT @curtdoolittle: @X_Filosofo @AshaLogos @sovereignbrah All religions fail, and must fail, post-agrarianism unless they are reduced to law…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 23:23:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756821324587020763

  • All religions fail, and must fail, post-agrarianism unless they are reduced to l

    All religions fail, and must fail, post-agrarianism unless they are reduced to law, that is testable, decidable, and resolves differences, thus facilitating cooperation.

    Religions are simple myths that convey subjectively experiential values for use as general rules of behavior.

    In this way they contain unconscious rules (metaphysical grammars) that do not require young adult reason, or mature empiricism.

    In the hierarchy of grammars, from anthropomorphic to mythic to theological to philosophical to rationalism to empiricism to science to operationalism, we require the least cognitive and informational density at the beginning and the most cognitive effort and informational density at the end.

    Therefore as the complexity of social economic technological and political orders increase, we develop not only classes under the division of labor, but cognitive classes each using grammars of their class, in hierarchical order.

    As such, where, in primitive societies classes were marginally indifferent, in advanced societies classes are marginally different and sometimes vastly so.

    So, instead of a unifying religion of the simple and anthropomorphic experiential we require a strategy for the grop that is consistent whether described at that mythological and intuitionistic level or at the calculative and unintuitive level.

    As such the only solution is a non-false religion that can be expressed mythically to computationally.

    The only religion I know of that does this is nature worship, ancestor worship, hero worship, and ‘nation-worship’. Because all religion provokes a debt response, producing the submission response, producing the sense of safety in the group, producing mindfulness, because of shared systems of values and measurements. This is why religions function for all humans – but grammars (paradigms) of differ across humans and in particular vary by race.

    So, (a) first understand your group evolutionary strategy and why it has been successful, and (b) then attempt to translate past religions in to a new religion that is no longer false. And is, at worst, metaphysically presumptive and narrative.

    Why? Because the truth is quite challenging – we are relevant to the universe – it is a vast hostile irradiated wasteland, and even this planet seeks to genocide us with disturbing regularity – and as such must become, as our ancient pre-christian ancestors understood, competitors to the gods, so by our reason and civility eventually replace them as gods ourselves.

    Reply addressees: @X_Filosofo @AshaLogos @sovereignbrah


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 23:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756821293523931136

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756818063830196348

  • WHY THE EMPHASIS ON OPERATIONAL PROSE – AND WHAT IS IT? Operational prose, withi

    WHY THE EMPHASIS ON OPERATIONAL PROSE – AND WHAT IS IT?

    Operational prose, within the context of Doolittle’s Natural Law, P-Law, or Propertarianism, represents a method of expressing ideas, concepts, and statements in a manner that is precise, verifiable, and grounded in observable and testable actions. This approach is designed to eliminate ambiguity, reduce misunderstandings, and facilitate clear communication, and improve truth or falsehood detection, especially in complex fields like law, economics, and social sciences.

    Here’s a breakdown of its key aspects and implications:

    1. Definition and Purpose

    Operational prose requires defining concepts and statements in terms of specific, observable actions or processes. This method aims to ensure that every term and sentence can be empirically tested or logically verified, mirroring the precision found in programming languages or mathematical formulations.

    2. Techniques and Elements

    Elimination of Ambiguous Language: Operational prose avoids vague terms and generalizations by specifying the exact actions or phenomena being discussed.

    Use of Complete Sentences: Each statement is structured to convey a complete thought, including the subject, action, and object, ensuring clarity and coherence.

    Operational Vocabulary: The vocabulary consists of terms defined through their operational (action-based) meanings, which relate directly to observable and testable phenomena.

    E-Prime Language: Operational prose often employs E-Prime, a version of the English language that excludes all forms of the verb “to be” (is, are, was, were, etc.). This exclusion aims to reduce the assertion of absolute or objective states, focusing instead on perceptions and experiences.

    Promissory Form: Statements in operational prose may include a form of promise or warranty, indicating the speaker’s commitment to the truthfulness and reliability of their assertions.

    3. Applications and Benefits

    Clarity and Precision: By requiring descriptions to be grounded in observable actions, operational prose minimizes the risk of misinterpretation and enhances the clarity of communication.

    Empirical Testability: This approach ensures that statements can be empirically tested or logically verified, aligning with the scientific method’s emphasis on falsifiability and verification.

    Reduction of Deceit and Ambiguity: Operational prose is designed to make deceit more difficult and to clarify intentions, making it a powerful tool in legal and ethical reasoning.

    4. Challenges in Adoption
    Operational prose is, like grammatical analysis, a methodology, and tool, where repeated use develops an intuition in the person using it. So, while operational prose offers significant benefits for clarity and precision, it can be challenging to adopt widely due to its departure from conventional language use. It requires a rigorous rethinking of how we express ideas and a commitment to specificity that may not always be intuitive or straightforward.

    5. Impact on Disciplines
    In disciplines like law, economics, and the social sciences, operational prose could revolutionize the way concepts are discussed and arguments are made. By demanding that statements be operationalizable, it ensures that theoretical discussions have practical, testable implications, bridging the gap between abstract theory and empirical reality.

    Conclusion
    Operational prose, as advocated in Doolittle’s Natural Law, P-Law, and Propertarianism, is more than just a stylistic choice; it’s a methodological tool designed to enhance the precision, reliability, and verifiability of communication across various fields. Its emphasis on observable actions and testable statements aligns closely with the scientific method, promising to refine and improve discourse in both the hard and soft sciences.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 22:06:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756801913306161152

  • RT @datepsych: Singles – lower in extraversion and conscientiousness, higher in

    RT @datepsych: Singles – lower in extraversion and conscientiousness, higher in

    RT @datepsych: Singles – lower in extraversion and conscientiousness, higher in neuroticism. https://t.co/5gGGWMhwj6


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 05:34:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756552154553237929

  • RT @charlesmurray: Agreed. And men with income-earning wives lost a lot of the i

    RT @charlesmurray: Agreed. And men with income-earning wives lost a lot of the incentive to stay with the mother of his children in a bad m…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 05:33:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756551957492150711

  • Von Neumann yes, certainly. Lamport not significant enough

    Von Neumann yes, certainly. Lamport not significant enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 01:54:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756496814230958366

    Reply addressees: @pseudorandompi @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756495441523351618

  • Yes I know

    Yes I know.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 01:51:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756496109613023667

    Reply addressees: @Aristogogue @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756465499318235278

  • RT @EPoe187: If you translate from the distorted language of progressives, “race

    RT @EPoe187: If you translate from the distorted language of progressives, “race science” just means “taking Darwinism seriously.” Of cours…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-10 20:04:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756408766268854467

  • RT @ScottAdamsSays: So far, DEI has destroyed all movies and TV shows, our entir

    RT @ScottAdamsSays: So far, DEI has destroyed all movies and TV shows, our entire education system, our airlines industry, every social med…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-10 20:03:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756408689865420844

  • Some of us don’t wish for it at all but seek to prevent it from happening. I’ve

    Some of us don’t wish for it at all but seek to prevent it from happening. I’ve been doing that since the 90s. Because to some of us it’s a deterministic process. And we predicted the time frame pretty accurately. So you cannot judge other’s deep understanding of such matters…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-10 19:03:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756393354525360244

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756353015181717890