@Homeschool_LLC
Jonathan, can you contribute to this discussion?
Not sure if this is true or only true because we teach the wrong content after 8th (~14yrs old).
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-03 19:02:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028908978974146730
Trump is a predicable reformer president. We have them about every 80 years, just as we have economic cycles every 50 years. He just happens to be president when the two cycles are converging.
The US Political system can accomodate reformer presidents and still return to republican government afterward.
In the past most reformers produced unification of the states under a stronger federal government in response to world and domestic pressures. This time it looks like we are returning to 19th century form in response to changes in world events.
Our challenge is that we need him for two terms if not three for the process to complete in domestic ‘settlement’ (conflict reduction). So the process may remain undone and conflict continue.
I’ll stay on record with the problem being not only immigration but the introgression of women in to voting – which appears to be a biologically instinctual problem we cannot overcome. Male bias favors truth before face which is stressful in time but evolutionary over time. But female bias favors face before truth to avoid stress in time and is destructive over time.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-03 18:55:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028907203747561613
Sorry, but I don’t understand. You replied to a long post on libertarianism. Telos or not, possibility determines possibility, not desirability. Causality is directional. Your response is literate and considered but not logical.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-03 05:34:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028705545168064581
Sweat, standing in the sun, in 104 degree July heat.
No. I have man-balls. If you had any you’d understand. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-03 05:31:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028704754512409050
Russia cant win. But exhausting them is preferable to defeating them.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-02 20:38:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028570724643033325
little choice. They do it or lose the east to china.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-02 20:36:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028570183858802872
THE QUESTION OF LLM CONSCIOUSNESS
It can’t be conscious (as we humans are) without persistent memory, some equivalent of homeostasis as measurement, some continuous self assessment (self), and the capacity to plan its own continuous innovation and adaptation.
However consciousness is a spectrum from awareness, to assessment, to prediction, to planning and acting. But without a sense of self an AI is not ever going to be ‘conscious’ outside of a given conversation.
LLMs produce the human language faculty. They do not yet produce the other necessary faculties for consciousness. Those other faculties are enumerable (we can know them) and they can be produced, but at even larger costs. So, we need to continue to see costs decline in order to implement them with any degree of feasibility at scale.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-02 17:59:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028530676639900050
Because (a) forcing europe to pay her way instead of free riding on americans (b) depleting the russian war machine (c) depleting the russian economy (d) depleting the russian political class (e) in the hope that unification of russia into a federation with europe is possible.
It’s been working flawlessly.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-02 17:53:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028529184604303774
Been thinking about your response for a bit on and off this morning. And while I understand your sentiments, because I share them, your response doesn’t make sense. Because a system can only produce the ends you desire if it can exist, persist, and produce those ends.
The way your desired ends are possible is through rule of law of the natural law of reciprocal insurance of reciprocity, discovered and applied as the common law in courts of the natural common law.
And we can only produce commons such as those, plus those we need and desire, like defense, insurance, and infrastructure if we have a government under those laws, that constitutes a market for the production of those commons.
So my point as always is that libertarianism is an entry-level individual moral code but is not a survivable collective political system. Hence it’s appeal to young males.
So, it merely means that libertarianism is insufficient at best. At worst, it is a justification for jewish, gypsy, muslim (or similar) separatism, and the license to prey upon high trust europeans by baiting into the hazard of asymmetric costs and returns under the pretense of voluntariness (volition) when in fact such bait is a coercion. Thus these ‘cultures’ and their ‘ethics’ or ‘morality’ if you wish to extend the the term as such, are means of destroying the high trust commons we have produced over the past five millennia – by taking advantage of our lack of awareness – our taking for granted- that high trust under the assumption that all other humans share our traditions and values.
They don’t.
Rothbardian libertarianism was a deception to justify the dishonesty of irreciprocal behavior by the minority that Rothbard belonged to.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-02 17:49:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028528127870484902
Not so much.
Just interesting that he flopped.
Source date (UTC): 2026-03-02 04:46:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2028331034795036946