Author: Curt Doolittle

  • RT @charlesmurray: When my wife and I researched Apollo, we were struck by the d

    RT @charlesmurray: When my wife and I researched Apollo, we were struck by the difference between the engineers and the kind of people we h…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 00:26:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765896934735155222

  • My understanding of history is that the industrial revolution made impossible th

    My understanding of history is that the industrial revolution made impossible the preservation of empires – and that nation states and federations of those states would become standards of modernity.
    Russia was not able to create a civilization state out of multiple ethnicities… https://twitter.com/Prune602/status/1765889177537700030


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-08 00:09:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765892518627975479

  • Sorry. I meant both the botmasters who produce this nonsense and the characters

    Sorry. I meant both the botmasters who produce this nonsense and the characters they’re putting forth… ;).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:56:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765889286623130046

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765884437513031853

  • CLAUDE-OPUS 3 VS GPT4+ (BOTH PAID) Claude is MUCH smarter at present. Note that

    CLAUDE-OPUS 3 VS GPT4+ (BOTH PAID)
    Claude is MUCH smarter at present.
    Note that Claude3 correctly identified “Unambiguity” while GPT4 correctly identified “Empirical Rigor” but neither identified both.

    PROMPT FOR BOTH AIs
    “I use the term “testifiable prose” to refer to the set of criteria requiring:
    1. Complete Sentences
    2. In promissory form
    3. In testimonial form
    4. In operational vocabulary (as actions)
    5. From an observer’s point of view
    6. Absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
    7. Including all changes in state
    8. Including all consequences of change in state
    9. Producing a series of testable transactions.

    What can you derive from that set of requirements?”

    1) CLAUDE 3 RESPONSE
    Based on the set of criteria you provided for “testifiable prose,” I can derive several key implications and benefits:

    Clarity and specificity (Unambiguous): By requiring complete sentences in promissory and testimonial form, using operational vocabulary, and avoiding the verb “to be,” the prose becomes more precise and unambiguous. This helps to minimize misinterpretation and ensures that the ideas being conveyed are clear and specific.
    Objectivity (Observable, Empirical): By writing from an observer’s point of view, the prose maintains a sense of objectivity. This perspective helps to reduce bias and subjective interpretations, making the information more reliable and trustworthy.
    Actionable content: (Existentially Possible) The use of operational vocabulary (as actions) means that the prose focuses on concrete, observable behaviors or processes. This emphasis on actionable content makes the information more practical and applicable in real-world situations.
    Comprehensive account: (full accounting) By including all changes in state and their consequences, the prose provides a complete and comprehensive account of the subject matter. This thorough approach ensures that no important details are omitted, and readers have a full understanding of the situation or process being described.
    Testability and verification: (Testable) The requirement to produce a series of testable transactions means that the claims or statements made in the prose can be empirically validated. This testability is crucial for establishing the credibility and reliability of the information being presented.
    Logical consistency: (Consistent) The structured nature of the prose, with its focus on complete sentences, clear cause-and-effect relationships, and the inclusion of all relevant changes in state, promotes logical consistency. This consistency helps to ensure that the arguments or ideas presented are coherent and well-supported.
    Accessibility and engagement: (Comprehensible) While the prose may be more structured and formal than everyday language, the emphasis on clarity, specificity, and actionable content can make it more accessible and engaging for readers. By providing a clear and comprehensive account of the subject matter, the prose can effectively communicate complex ideas to a wide audience.
    Reproducibility: (Repeatable) The testability and comprehensive nature of the prose make it possible for others to reproduce the described processes or verify the claims made. This reproducibility is essential for building trust and credibility, as it allows for independent confirmation of the information presented.
    Foundational for further analysis: (Sound) The structured and comprehensive nature of testifiable prose provides a solid foundation for further analysis, discussion, and decision-making. By establishing a clear and reliable account of the subject matter, the prose enables more productive and informed conversations and actions.

    In summary, the set of criteria for testifiable prose helps to create a form of communication that is clear, specific, objective, actionable, comprehensive, testable, logically consistent, accessible, reproducible, and foundational for further analysis.

    These characteristics make testifiable prose a powerful tool for conveying information, arguments, and ideas in a manner that is both reliable and impactful.

    2) CHATGPT 4+ RESPONSE

    The concept of “testifiable prose,” as defined by your criteria, is an approach to writing that emphasizes clarity, precision, and accountability. It’s designed to ensure that every statement can be empirically tested or verified, thus holding the writer to a high standard of truthfulness and reliability. Here’s an analysis of each criterion and what it collectively suggests about testifiable prose:

    1. Complete Sentences
    This ensures that each thought or idea is fully formed and presented in a coherent manner, facilitating clarity and understanding.

    2. In Promissory Form
    Writing in promissory form implies a commitment to delivering specific outcomes or actions. It’s a way of making a clear, actionable promise that can be assessed for fulfillment.

    3. In Testimonial Form
    Incorporating testimonial form means that the prose is based on observable, verifiable facts or experiences. This enhances the credibility and reliability of the information presented.

    4. In Operational Vocabulary (as actions)
    Focusing on actions rather than abstract concepts ensures that the writing is grounded in real-world activities that can be observed, measured, and evaluated.

    5. From an Observer’s Point of View
    Adopting an observer’s perspective ensures objectivity and neutrality, making the prose less biased and more universally verifiable.

    6. Absent the Verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
    Eliminating the verb “to be” avoids passive constructions and necessitates more precise and active language, which in turn makes the actions and outcomes clearer.

    7. Including All Changes in State
    Detailing all changes in state ensures that the narrative captures the full scope of events or actions, including any transitions or transformations that are crucial for understanding the sequence and impact of actions.

    8. Including All Consequences of Change in State
    By accounting for all consequences of changes in state, the prose commits to a comprehensive depiction of outcomes, enabling a thorough assessment of the actions’ impact.

    9. Producing a Series of Testable Transactions
    This criterion aims for the prose to result in statements that can be empirically tested or verified, grounding the narrative in factual accuracy and accountability.

    Collective Implications:

    Empirical Rigor: Testifiable prose demands a high level of empirical rigor, ensuring that every statement is anchored in observable and verifiable reality.

    Accountability: The approach fosters accountability in writing, as each claim or statement made can be tested against real-world outcomes or experiences.

    Clarity and Precision: By adhering to these criteria, the prose becomes clearer and more precise, leaving little room for ambiguity or misinterpretation.

    Action-Oriented: The focus on operational vocabulary and actions ensures that the writing is practical, actionable, and grounded in real-world processes.

    Objective and Unbiased: Writing from an observer’s perspective and emphasizing testable transactions promotes an objective and unbiased approach to conveying information.

    In summary, testifiable prose is a disciplined writing approach designed to enhance the clarity, accuracy, and reliability of information, making it particularly valuable in fields where empirical evidence and accountability are paramount.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:54:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765888905516105728

  • I’m not making that assumption. But I can see how you might think so. 😉

    I’m not making that assumption. But I can see how you might think so. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:33:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765883582160011440

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765881336248582305

  • I didn’t go there. Thank you for enlightening me. 😉 lolz

    I didn’t go there. Thank you for enlightening me. 😉 lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:32:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765883355805929814

    Reply addressees: @portoben399084

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765882954247467226

  • CLAUDE 3 LEARNED P-LAW DISAMBIGUATION FROM TWO PROMPTS? !!! Note that I didn’t s

    CLAUDE 3 LEARNED P-LAW DISAMBIGUATION FROM TWO PROMPTS? !!!

    Note that I didn’t suggest the term to disambiguate. It did. I provided only (a) the SDO post and (b) the Types post.
    The result is a little weak (the use of average) but otherwise it appears I can teach it anything…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:32:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765883200016908576

  • CLAUDE 3 LEARNED P-LAW DISAMBIGUATION FROM TWO PROMPTS? !!! Note that I didn’t s

    CLAUDE 3 LEARNED P-LAW DISAMBIGUATION FROM TWO PROMPTS? !!!

    Note that I didn’t suggest the term to disambiguate. It did. I provided only (a) the SDO post and (b) the Types post.
    The result is a little weak (the use of average) but otherwise it appears I can teach it anything within a context window.

    CD: PROMPT
    Excellent. Do you think you could apply the method described in these two posts?

    CLAUDE3-OPUS
    Yes, I believe I can apply the method described in the two posts to create a system of measurement for a given concept. Let me demonstrate by applying the process to the concept of “intelligence.”

    Step 1: Select the term: Intelligence

    Step 2: Collect related terms, synonyms, and antonyms

    Ignorance, stupidity, foolishness, cleverness, wisdom, knowledge, understanding, aptitude, intellect, brilliance, genius

    Step 3: Organize the terms in a sequence based on a constant relation Ignorance < Stupidity < Foolishness < Average Intelligence < Cleverness < Intellect < Wisdom < Brilliance < Genius

    Step 4: Define or redefine terms to ensure unambiguity within the sequence

    Ignorance: Lack of knowledge, understanding, or awareness
    Stupidity: Acting or behaving in a way that shows a lack of intelligence or understanding
    Foolishness: Lack of good sense or judgment
    Average Intelligence: Having a level of intelligence that is typical or common among the general population
    Cleverness: Having quick-witted intelligence and resourcefulness
    Intellect: The faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively
    Wisdom: The ability to use knowledge, experience, and understanding to make good judgments and decisions
    Brilliance: Exceptional intellectual ability and originality
    Genius: Extraordinary intellectual and creative power

    Step 5: Convert definitions to Operational Language in complete sentences without using the verb “to be”

    Ignorance: One demonstrates a lack of knowledge, understanding, or awareness.
    Stupidity: One acts or behaves in a way that shows a lack of intelligence or understanding.
    Foolishness: One demonstrates a lack of good sense or judgment.
    Average Intelligence: One demonstrates a level of intelligence that is typical or common among the general population.
    Cleverness: One demonstrates quick-witted intelligence and resourcefulness.
    Intellect: One demonstrates the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively.
    Wisdom: One demonstrates the ability to use knowledge, experience, and understanding to make good judgments and decisions.
    Brilliance: One demonstrates exceptional intellectual ability and originality.
    Genius: One demonstrates extraordinary intellectual and creative power.
    Step 6: Use the most precise term from the sequence when communicating When discussing someone’s intelligence, use the most appropriate term from the sequence to convey the precise level of intelligence being referred to.
    Step 7: Enumerate and repeat the series when educating others When explaining the concept of intelligence, enumerate the series to help others understand the spectrum of intelligence and the specific terms used to describe different levels of intelligence.

    By applying this process to the concept of intelligence, we have created a system of measurement that allows for more precise communication and understanding of the various levels of intelligence. This method can be applied to other concepts to create similar systems of measurement, improving clarity and precision in communication and thinking.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:32:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765883199693914112

  • OPERATIONAL PROSE ABSENT THE VERB TO-BE (repost) Operational prose that avoids t

    OPERATIONAL PROSE ABSENT THE VERB TO-BE
    (repost)
    Operational prose that avoids the verb “to be” in its various forms (is, are, was, were, etc.) and constructs complete sentences can significantly reduce the occurrence of vague, ambiguous, and evasive language. This style of writing emphasizes action, clarity, and directness, impacting the use of weasel words, passive voice, and other evasive strategies in several ways:

    Reduces Weasel Words and Vagueness: By focusing on concrete actions rather than abstract states of being, operational prose makes it harder to use weasel words that lack specificity. Statements must be tied to specific actions, actors, and outcomes, which naturally demands more precision and clarity.

    Eliminates Passive Voice: Without the verb “to be,” the passive construction becomes nearly impossible to use. This forces the writer to specify the subject performing an action, thereby increasing accountability and transparency in the prose.

    Limits Hedging and Ambiguity: Operational prose, by its nature, requires that statements be tied to clear and verifiable actions or outcomes. This makes it more difficult to hedge or be ambiguous, as each sentence must convey a specific action or result that can be measured or observed.

    Discourages Nominalizations: Operational prose encourages the use of active verbs, reducing the tendency to turn verbs into nouns (nominalizations), which often make sentences more abstract and less clear.

    Focuses on Specific Actions Over Generalizations: By emphasizing actions over states, operational prose avoids broad, untestable claims, focusing instead on specific, demonstrable activities or achievements.

    Minimizes Jargon and Bureaucratese: While not directly tied to the exclusion of the verb “to be,” operational prose’s emphasis on clarity and action can also help minimize the use of unnecessary jargon and bureaucratese, which often obscure meaning.

    Operational prose encourages a more direct, action-oriented style of writing that is inherently clearer and more specific. This style naturally mitigates the use of linguistic strategies designed to obscure, evade, or inflate, promoting instead a form of communication that is more straightforward and easier to verify or challenge.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:16:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765879292523667456

  • Cracks me up every time some scammer, onlyfans, or porn chick (or male bitcoin p

    Cracks me up every time some scammer, onlyfans, or porn chick (or male bitcoin promoter) likes one of my posts that contains content three or four standard deviations above her (or his) rather obvious lack of capacity. … I wish there was a way to block them all.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-03-07 23:14:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1765878832760832182