Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:49:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769798334510743652
Reply addressees: @BlameMaxSand @ancientnatsoc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769794032929050631
Hugs. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:49:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769798334510743652
Reply addressees: @BlameMaxSand @ancientnatsoc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769794032929050631
It will take 2M men in DC for 90 days.
That’s all.
The govt will cave.
Why? Visibility of our demands and solutions.
The solutions are so beneficial to all but the fringe left, that the public will support them
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:49:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769798285261172873
Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769795314100113485
There are six to eight holes in the constitution depending upon how you count them. Fix the holes. Prevent the feminine means of warfare and …. that’s it. The rest is policy reform to ‘correct’ the harms imposed.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:48:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769797942259445824
Reply addressees: @josh61597760 @ancientnatsoc
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769795942197149899
It (the enemy) is in fact, easy to defend against. I understand it’s tragic simplicity and why we in our heroism and Christianity are vulnerable to it. So, modifying our law to equally suppress the feminine means of evasion, deception, seduction, baiting into hazard,…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:29:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769793341112086592
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769787611759976561
Um…. Quite the contrary. The Institute’s primary risk is Martin’s tendency to speak the most skeptical truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the whole skeptical truth, regardless of consequence. 😉
But he’s Czech. They’re the least agreeable people in Europe. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:27:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769792672070345148
Reply addressees: @superkanga @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769789378807636196
SOURCES OF CORE IDEAS
FWIW: The two three I use that are directly from the work of others are
1. Chomsky’s continuous recursive disambiguation as universal grammar turns out to be the universal law of everything.
2. Baron-Cohen’s empathizing vs systematizing – really is the key to it all.
3. I use the big 5/6 and combine with with intelligence to show it’s all just information processing.
4. Haidt’s moral foundations that I converted to demonstrated interests (property)
5. Hoppe’s reduction of all social science to statments of demonstrated interest.
6. Most of the rest is my work that is all derived from analysis of language (the grammars) and neuroscience and genetics. I simply can’t emphasize enough the importance of that work. And the logic I use computational, constructive(operational), economic (Gary Becker), and evolutionary which means I must decompose all phenomenon into first principles and reconstruct each phenomena from them (write a proof).
Reply addressees: @bootlegapples
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:23:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769791842755727361
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769788538805973135
I try brother.
Thank you for your ongoing encouragement. It matters to me. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:13:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769789324705329524
Reply addressees: @adominguez792
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769786888510959644
Too many to list. Think of it more as a reduction to first principles of the present state of all knowledge across all disciplines – which is, of course, my project: universal commensurability and testifiability (truth). A project that was not possible for previous generations.
Where possible I make use of terms from existing terminology and research and then explain them causally. This should and does lower the resistance to the ideas. I avoid neologisms whenever possible. And prefer to ‘correctly’ disambiguate and define terms instead.
Reply addressees: @bootlegapples
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:12:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769789076725489664
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769788209901281661
I am the only leader on the right with tangible, actionable, solutions that will succeed. However, I am also an intellectual and while I work on behalf of my people I am not a populist or able to speak as a populist, because the solutions to our crisis are rather simple if we obtain political power (by force if necessary) to implement them as law, but rather technical in explanation.
So I suffer a bit of the Cassandra effect….
Reply addressees: @ancientnatsoc
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:10:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769788450578776064
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769787785362199034
RT @RickGenie: @elonmusk @ScottAdamsSays “That’s a lot of clowns to put in one car”
Scott Adams for the mic drop. Snark
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-18 18:07:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1769787822896984233