(correct)
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 22:40:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772393083172208996
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Saurabh_Shah1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772392782398693527
(correct)
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 22:40:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772393083172208996
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @Saurabh_Shah1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772392782398693527
YES THERE IS A DOCUMENTED VIRGIN BIRTH
–“Is there an actual confirmed/documented case of parthenogenesis (virgin birth) in humans?”–
Well, we assumed it wasn’t possible, and we weren’t looking for it. And it’s only recently that the possibility’s been accepted. So far, like most things, we only know of it by outliers instead of otherwise normal children. So we know it’s possible but until there is widespread genetic testing of otherwise ordinary appearing babies we won’t be able to measure the frequency.
I suspect it’s rare but not THAT rare, especially for girls.
HERE:
There is one documented case of a natural half-parthenogenetic birth: In 1995, British geneticists reported the remarkable case of a young boy whose body is derived in part from an unfertilized egg.
This boy, referred to as FD, has some unique genetic features:
White Blood Cells: FD’s white blood cells contain two X chromosomes, which is the chromosomal signature of a female. However, they lack any Y chromosome material, which is typically present in males.
Skin vs. Blood: Interestingly, FD’s skin is genetically different from his blood. His skin contains the normal X and Y chromosomes of a typical male.
Identical X Chromosomes: In both his skin and blood cells, FD’s X chromosomes are identical and derived entirely from his mother.
The researchers believe that FD’s development began when an unfertilized egg self-activated and started dividing.
This extraordinary case provides a rare glimpse into the control of human development and the evolutionary changes that made sex essential for mammalian reproduction.
Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 22:36:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772392263181623296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772313997066293565
Of course, and so has every other synthetic historian in history. ;). “Christianity was a religion of the meal, hearth, and home practiced by women, then slaves, and only accepted by men when the ability to control the women slaves and lower classes was possible by the new…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 22:29:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772390466450866228
Reply addressees: @cocksmanicles @gentKarter91 @KaeleyT @RealCandaceO
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772387944705282112
I wrote a post today on why no single system of government alone sufficed. Likewise, no wisdom literature on its own suffices.
The reasons are simple: precision, potential, adaptability, and rate of innovation and adaptation.
So in the hierarchy of wisdom literatures, and their underlying paradigms and logics, the rate of innvation and adaptation is determined by the precision potential and adaptability of that paradigm.
|Logical Paradigms|: Embodiment > Anthropomorphism > Mythology > Theology > Proto-philosophy > Rational Philosophy > Empiricism > Science > Operationalism. With each more precise and explanatory than the previous.
Conversely, the degree of neotenic evolution (IQ) of the population limits the precision and potential and adaptability they can tolerate and as such the paradigm and logic they can make use of.
So Africa has the lowest IQ and relies on disorganized magic. MENA has the next lowest IQ and relies on organized supernatural mythology (theology). India has the next lowest IQ and developed class based religion mirroring the distribution of duty in a military order. China and Europe broke the 100 IQ barrier. So China developed Proto-philosophy and bureaucracy but failed at science and law. Europeans developed law and government, and from there, philosophy proper, geometry, empiricism, science, calculus, operationalism and computation.
There are only three means of coercing and therefore organizing people: 1) seduction/ostracization(social, religion), 2) remuneration/boycott (trade, property law), 3) defense/force (state, military).
And all civilizations demonstrate path dependence – the first is the most influential institution, the second less so and the third either fails or has the least influence.
But of these, religion is the least adaptive, state the next least adaptive, and property law the most adaptive.
So, the combination of (a) the IQ of the population (b) the founding institution (c) and the sequence of institutions determines the destiny of the civilization.
The indo european revolution was the most important since the agrarian revolution. It ended the primitvism and stagnation of the flood river valley civilizations.
The european people were largely replaced because of the small size and population of europe. The eastern indo europeans conquered the indus and India but had to create the cast system to preserve their genetic advantage. The persians were able to create victory and repeatedly expand but the ‘old’ civilizations had ‘lesser stock’ to work with, and already had a religion and institutions so the Indian method and the European method could not work.
So no. The Indo europeans, then the europeans alone, dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and victimization by nature that tries to exterminate mankind with disturbing regularity.
And you are ungrateful for the vast gifts we have given you.
That is why we are going home.
That is why, like before we will send you home.
That is why like the Chinese we will build a wall.
Because the Chinese are right.
You are a curse upon this earth.
A mental disease.
The source of ignorance, superstition, deceit, decline, and dysgenia.
If there is a devil.
His name is Allah, Jehova, God: cancer.
Cheers.
Reply addressees: @Saurabh_Shah1
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 22:28:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772390020831174656
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772373200669757947
RT @NoahRevoy: @curtdoolittle The only thing worse than population collapse is dysgenics.
Loss of numbers is preferable to loss of quality.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 20:35:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772361620053733518
—“No society is so stable that underclass reproduction becomes a positive thing.”— @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 20:32:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772360992741105875
RT @NoahRevoy: Getting married and staying married is elite behavior.
In a very stable society, it can even become middle-class behavior.…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 20:25:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772359140288930069
Pet peeve. Thx for sharing.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 20:25:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772359074329280958
Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772354843325170173
RT @spaceangelvoice: women will never truly understand the invisibleness of being male and men will truly never understand the sense of b…
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 20:24:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772358920444535006
You either need to make a testable argument or admit that you can’t and that you’re just wasting my time by self satisfaction of capturing someone else’s attention.
Source date (UTC): 2024-03-25 19:39:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772347517981651267
Reply addressees: @Saurabh_Shah1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1772346306423292066