THE CHALLENGE OF INTEGRATING INTO “WHITENESS”
|Responsibility|: Self (mind, emotion) > Personal(body) > Private > Common
I have habituated the use of “Private and Common” when this is a legacy of my work on evolving the category of property into demonstrated interests.
When speaking of responsibility in the context of non imposition of costs upon the the demonstrated interests of others, I should use the entire chain of responsibility: self, personal, private, common.
Otherwise I fail to make obvious the responsibility for self regulation of impulse, intuition, emotion, and action that together are required to limit our imposition of costs upon the broad range of demonstrated interests of others.
In fact, when considering the problem of integration into the west, meaning the adoption of ‘whiteness’ we can categorize races, ethnicities, cultures, and civilizations by which of the categories of responsibility those groups either lack the ability or traditions or institutions necessary to conform to ‘whiteness’.
It’s hard enough for our own women without constant social proof and reinforcement that largely, women themselves need to provide for one another. And even then that habit must be instilled my the intolerance of men for female antisocial behavior – because that antisocial behavior is endemic in women without that training and those limits.
Add those with lower IQ’s and lower neotenic evolution and lower trust societies and you have a recipe where the minority of westerners practicing whiteness, (and males are a minority in the first place) and you have an impossible system by which the devolution of the civilization is mandated by the ratio of irresponsibles to responsibles.
Cheers
CD