So you’re advocating celibacy? π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:18:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776403957528564065
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776400700857024554
So you’re advocating celibacy? π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:18:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776403957528564065
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776400700857024554
THE REFORMATION OF OUR RELIGION
Our religions are under assault because they have failed to adapt to modernity. As far as we know, they are heading to include only 20% of the population at best. Unlike the age of Augustine or Aquinas, the church failed to produce new philosopher⦠https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1776397978564976652
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:14:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776403043719737770
You are not intellectually capable, unbiased, and intellectually honest enough to make such an assessment. You are just another loser that is another fundamentalists urinating on others because you have nothing postive to contribute to the solutions of the age.
The right and the left are saturated with dark triad basement dwelling underclass losers desperate for attention and validation.
I’ve been working on this problem since at least 1990. If it wasn’t so difficult, someone would have solved it before me. That said, the science has only been sufficient over the past twenty years. So I’m just ‘a first mover’ on what others would do if they were attempting to solve the same problem.
Cheers loser. π
Reply addressees: @usecodewahhh
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:11:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776402410371493888
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776401228727226529
It took darwin how long? What about Hume? Kant? Hegel?
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:08:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776401578104144381
Reply addressees: @usecodewahhh
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776401228727226529
I just forget now and then. Sometimes all the commas. lol. Typogylcemia. π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:01:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776399831759556993
Reply addressees: @14WordsAllDay @WerrellBradley
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776395065331466659
We are progressing nicely thank you very much. Your approval is both unnecessary and irrelevant. Because you’re a contrary indicator (negative test), nothing and no one of meaning or substance.
The book, the constitution, the books, and the institute are all online in incrmental stages of development. One does not take on a task of this scale without vast effort, time, and the participation of others. Darwin took decades. The left has had more than a century and a half. The enlightenment and Christianity took centuries. We work in public on a massive project.
So far our only mistake was presuming you dark triad incel losers on the right were possible to convert into viable political movement.
We learned. You taught us why you always lose.
It’s your nature.
(blocked)
Reply addressees: @usecodewahhh
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-06 00:00:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776399635977846784
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776395681349157346
Assisting Dr Brad and Dr Jones with The Trinity as a Reflection of the Ternary Logic of the Universe.
I’m going to make a leap here, and try something, because we are working with a prominent theologian to try to find someway of bridging the laws of the universe with the trinity.
Father: (+)Masculine(force/defense) vs Son: (-)Feminine(inclusion(seduction)/Care)
And Father(+) + Son(-) = Holy Spirit(=) as “neutral, beneficial, cooperation”.
Likewise, any failure of cooperation (!=) equals collapse (vacuum, positive entropy).
This mirrors Positive spin(charge, +) vs Negative spin(charge, -) = Stable equilibrium (matter, negative entropy) of the quantum background and it’s emergent properties producing proto-particles (waves) and particles, elements, and molecules through evolutionary computation of all matter using nothing other than this principle.
That may be difficult for you to reason through but with a bit of work, it should be possible to understand.
If we consider the idea that God and the laws of the universe are closely related, either in identity or causality, it could provide a basis for legitimizing the concept of the Trinity.
So we are suggesting that the Trinity, as a central tenet of Catholic faith, may be seen as a reflection or manifestation of the fundamental laws that govern the universe.
In this context, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit could be understood as personifications of the essential principles that underlie reality, such as the interplay between positive and negative forces, the emergence of stable structures through cooperation, and the persistence or dissipation of energy and matter.
By drawing these parallels, we are inviting theologians to consider the Trinity not just as an abstract religious concept, but as a reflection of the deep structure of the cosmos.
Thanks
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
( cc: @WerrellBradley )
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 23:54:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776397978397200385
Take us a bit but we’ll get it done.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 23:19:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776389195239502205
Reply addressees: @Jake64533383814
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776385587492339985
Still on the table. π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 23:19:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776389119100240131
Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776386634906251588
(Twisted Humor)
1. Rock Crushers
2. Tire Shredders
3. Wood Chippers
4. Meat Grinders
5. Vegetable Slicers
6. Food Processors
7. Juicers
I’m all for using wood chippers.
I think the juicers are too slow and require too much work for the scale ‘production’ necessary. π
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-05 23:15:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1776388099196452866