Author: Curt Doolittle

  • Well there is zero chance you or anyone else will have the capacity to do so. So

    Well there is zero chance you or anyone else will have the capacity to do so. Sorry. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:56:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777470591924134033

    Reply addressees: @HeiligeHare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777468622178553906

  • “…the alt right is a male grievance movement masquerading as a racial one”–@s

    “…the alt right is a male grievance movement masquerading as a racial one”–@spaceangelvoice

    That’s is partly true, Kate. The reactionary right is a counter revolution against the conversion of the caretaking of christian progressivism consistent with the west, into the sedition of jewish marxist anti-male, anti-family, anti-western, feminism as an evolution of the sequence of class marxism, cultural marxism, race marxism — all of which had little public traction into the one group who could be easily captured by the false promise of end of responsibility for self regulation, defense of the commons, the primacy of the family over the individual, and the necessity of capitalization over consumption.

    You are sensitive to the female content which is accelerating now that the dating, mating, marriage, and intersexual compromise traditions have broken down, as well as family formation, reproduction, education – all of which has been possible by the ideological capture of women – the only reason any of the leftist policies of the civil rights era to present have been possible.

    So it’s a grievance movement, because the feminist movement became a grievance movement, just as the entire sequence became a grievance movement, and did not follow the pre-war christian progressive movement that sought only inclusion into our civilization rather than destruction of it from within.

    So should it not be a grievance movement? 😉

    Women, in the main, bias to minimize responsibility for the common and maximize hyper-consumption whether it’s of emotional and behavioral self regulation, attention seeking, consumption, or hypergamy. Men’s strategy is the opposite, which is to accumulate capital and responsibility for commons such that they signal resources that women can consume by sex, affection, care, and loyalty. With the ability of women to obtain clerical work because of the computer revolution combined with the male inability to obtain income because of offshoring, combined with social media and dating sites, and legalized proto-sex and sex work it’s been in women’s favor of hyper-consumption and minimum responsibility. … at the cost of our reproduction and our collapse as a civilization, causing a collapse of our ability to continue benefit redistribution that now consumes the majority of the budget.

    Those of us who have studied this phenomena see it as obvious, but that requires a great deal of knowledge of both he original sources, and how they spread to the academy, media, and entertainment, and then into education and politics and the degeneration of the norms that assist the sexes in the compromise necessary for family formation, persistence, and generational production.

    Affections
    Thanks for all your insights
    -Curt

    Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:55:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777470412042956800

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777392699038917076

  • RL… That’s how I feel in the magnificence of your presence… Love you man. 😉

    RL… That’s how I feel in the magnificence of your presence…

    Love you man. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:39:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777466399700455582

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777412020335231327

  • Primitives are what they are. The question is, once the country completes it’s c

    Primitives are what they are. The question is, once the country completes it’s conversion to modernity (which is a slow but increasingly successful process) how the religion and the people adapt – or like islam are they prisoners of their IQ and ignorance problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:32:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777464511215079854

    Reply addressees: @HeiligeHare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777463316719571103

  • I’M NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN I’m anti-abrahamism (lying), not anti christian (Jesus).

    I’M NOT ANTI CHRISTIAN
    I’m anti-abrahamism (lying), not anti christian (Jesus).
    If you want fundamentalism, you need to learn to lie to justify it. Learning the very simple lesson Jesus teaches takes not rationalization, justification, mysticism, supernaturalism, fiction, fraud, or lying.
    Jesus solve the problem of the prisoner’s dilemma of cooperation by demanding the counter intuitive: seduction non aggression and by forgiveness into cooperation for mutual benefit: the extension of kinship love to all.
    This made it possible for the primitive people of the middle east and the lower classes in the west, to find status, self image, self respect, and mindfulness without the wealth, power, ability of the upper classes of aristocratic warriors.
    The Jeffersonian bible is sufficient, and doesn’t require lying to your self, others, or social construction of falsehoods.
    It may be that some percentage of the people require the supernatural to sedate their neuroticism enough to obtain mindfulness. However the vast majority will not reject Christianity or natural law or Western philosophy, or Western science once they understand that Jesus’ solution was the only possible answer to achieving cooperation between the underclasses at the scale and under the technology of Greco Roman Civilization and the rate of change it imposed on the civilizations that had been static for three thousand years.

    Affections all.
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:30:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777464140862230528

  • “Q: What is the purpose of our civilization? Is it an end in itself or merely a

    –“Q: What is the purpose of our civilization? Is it an end in itself or merely a means to something greater?”–

    Great Question. Great topic for a long article, but the short version:
    (a) Surviving Competition (from lesser peoples)
    (b) Self Determination by Self Determined Means – together.
    (c) “The Proto-Indo-Europeans and their gods were heroic, militaristic, expansionist, and sky-worshipping, and – not peaceful, earth-worshipping, and agrarian.” And aristocratic egalitarianism (“make the people better so there are more of us”) It’s heroic.
    (d) Innovative, adaptive, Evolutionary Velocity.
    (e) Condition of prosperity while doing so.
    (f) Aryanism: Transcendence into, and defeat of, the gods we imagine (which are specious).

    The answer to your question: The purpose of our civilization is our Transcendence into gods by use of our dominance over ourselves, others, nature, and the universe

    Reply addressees: @ProphetOfHelios


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:22:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777461945509007360

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777444784094822538

  • RT @AutistocratMS: @FernandoGLV1212 @curtdoolittle Democritus – atomistic physic

    RT @AutistocratMS: @FernandoGLV1212 @curtdoolittle Democritus – atomistic physics
    Aristotle – social and political science
    Machiavelli – di…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:11:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777459186940444872

  • I’m not disagreeing but my understanding is purely structural (comparative relig

    I’m not disagreeing but my understanding is purely structural (comparative religion as an institution). So if you’d explain why it’s disgusting I’d like to understand?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:05:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777457757936890295

    Reply addressees: @HeiligeHare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777455239869931814

  • Hi Richard (I always enjoy hearing from you) I think if you mean the purpose of

    Hi Richard (I always enjoy hearing from you)
    I think if you mean the purpose of religion is social – the individual should conform, and conversely the purpose of philosophy is either personal or political – and the individual should advocate or pursue.
    If we survey all religions across time their purpose is to create mindfulness by shared metaphysics, values, morals, ethics, manners, and most importantly *means of persuasion, persistence, because it reduces the chance of conflict, increases the chances of cooperation, and increases the velocity of cooperation by the production of trust. The result is mindfulness (suppression of neuroticism).
    What you mention above is a correct derivation and restatement of the causes I’ve stated here. So in that sense, you’re correct. 😉

    Reply addressees: @rikstorey


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 21:57:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777455732641660928

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777452335779782956

  • The Criteria for Claim of Truthful Speech

    The Criteria for Claim of Truthful Speech

    The Criteria for Claim of Truthful Speech https://t.co/V7dZiihekV


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 21:02:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777441903811633366