Youre redefining a nation state to suit a want rather than simply stating that a

Youre redefining a nation state to suit a want rather than simply stating that a nation is a population of shared culture and ethnicity and a state is an insurer of last resort capable of exercising a monopoly of violence.

That says nothing about whether the nation state can survive internal conflict or external conflict. As I keep explaining to you, y ou’re playing the libertarian game of thinking your wants have any impact on external conditions – they don’t. You can’t have an anarcho capitalist state, you can’t have an internal libertarian state, and you can’t have an external-libertarian state. The world determines the constraints on you. You have only the choice of what to do with them. And again, I don’t really see how, given your thorough defeat of libertarians how you can make the same mistake as a country as they do as a citizen.

Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @partymember55 @gspeth @RichardDawkins