Would you rather we took the opportunity postwar to conquer and rule the whole world – because it was easily within our power?
We learned from colonialism that we cannot save you – we can only create an environment where you can save yourselves.
Had the middle east not held such reserves it would still be a backwater like much of africa. But as such we needed to defend those reserves for the purpose of completing our project of dragging humanity into modernity and prosperity. We did.
But we can’t civilize the uncivilized. We can only create the environment where they can civilize themselves.
The only places we have been successful at ‘civilization’ has been by total replacement. That includes the total replacement of native europeans by the steppe herders europeans creating what is today european peoples.
Reply addressees: @Chuckytuh @RichardDawkins
Source date (UTC): 2024-11-13 03:40:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856542662121394176
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1856541885181112418
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
We succeeded in most of the world, in modernizing most of the world and dragging it out of poverty. The fact that russia is recidivist, that china even more so, that the muslim world needs another two to three generations without the oppression of iranian imperialism is simply a recognition that we no longer possess the population, economic and scientific advantage we did when the world committed suicide in the world wars.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1856541885181112418
Leave a Reply