It’s not just an opinion, it’s what the founders of fascism (National socialism

It’s not just an opinion, it’s what the founders of fascism (National socialism instead of international socialism) said was the purpose of fascism:
1 – The English Invention of the Modern classical liberal state was fine for island peoples who are naturally defended by the oceans. But for those people on the ‘world island’ of eurasia, surrounded on one side by the enemies (french) who had destroyed german civilization (Napoleon) forcing them to form a strong central state in defense. And surrounded by other enemies (russian) communists on the other, despite the german vast investment in modernizing the eastern european states since the age of the Hanseatic League.
2 – The english liberalism was too anarchic and too founded on its colonies and trade, while the french were irrational compared to the germans who found their german phenomenological rationalism a superior alternative to english legalism, french moral sophistry, and pseudoscientific and despotic jewish communism.
3 – The Weimar had failed, and the germans needed some means of survival after the pains of the first world war. And the fascists provided it – and the germans loved it.
4 – It is very hard to argue with either italian or german fascism in the context of the age. It’s even hard to argue with current Chinese Fascism. And while it is still in it’s early stages, it’s rather obvious that the fascists, who did in fact produce the optimum political order of the day by any possible measure given their circumstances, were other than visionary and in retrospect made the right choice. Furthermore, also, as intellectual trends tend to, becoming rather obvious that the anglosphere should have stayed out of WW1 and WW2 because germany was in the right in both wars – especially when through the lens of what had been done to her.

Reply addressees: @J58039716