This question keeps coming up. And I’m not sure why. I keep a table of european

This question keeps coming up. And I’m not sure why.
I keep a table of european vs jewish intellectuals to illustrate the origin of pseudoscience in the jewish civilization. And in the list I put a star next to people who ‘crossover’. When referring to Wolfram I mean that he ‘crossed over’. And while I could address this subject very technically, yes, he does display the technique of using math as language, and yes he makes the same mistakes as einstien and bohr, but fundamentally his approach is sound – and he is a weak expositor of his frame of reference, and this is why he’s not understood.

Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You