Well authority and hierarchy are in fact tests of LOYALTY (over-time, material, risk) whereas the left uses test of DEVOTION (in-time, social, no risk). This is a primary sex difference in condition you usually seek in r-k or herd-pack discussions, which are analogies but not causal.
As for science, the left does not use science in moral questions any more than the right does in religious questions. The fact that the right uses the left’s technique to defend religious question is one of the reason the right fails.
I suppose one of the issues here is that y’all are stopping at haid’s table/graph without following down to our work on sex differences in cognition and valuation.
Or the first principles of those sex difference.
So is your desire to falsify Haidt because he isn’t precise enough, or is your desire to prevent people from misusing haidt’s work, or is it your desire to demonize the opposition by reframing the moral biases to suit your interests, or as in my case are you trying to show that his work, while imprecise, is accessible, and clearly reflects OUR research on sex differences in cognition, valuation, moral demand, and political preference?
CD
Reply addressees: @JamesMJohnson4 @AutistocratMS @JonHaidt
Source date (UTC): 2024-07-17 21:46:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813691691314077696
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1813689796289769919
Leave a Reply