Rather fascinating if amateurish take, without any argument that addresses my wo

Rather fascinating if amateurish take, without any argument that addresses my work (or my organization’s work or life’s achievements.)
Instead, under the common feminine assumption your opinion or approval has any value or merit, you use the female pretense of knowledge, pretense of authority, combined with ad hominem undermining by casting unsupported assertions consisting of nothing but vapid opinions, made worse by the rather obvious demonstration that you cannot distinguish between true / false independent of you, and desirable / undesirable by you. And this is on top of a history of incompetency in analysis of the incentives and cognitive differences of both sexes.
I mean, for all your railing against the masculine mind, you’re a canonical example of the failures of the psychotic feminine despite it’s organization into relatively cogent prose.
So either you can explain all behavior of either sex as pursuit of rational incentives in the face of ignorance of consequences or you cannot. If you cannot do that then you cannot also distinguish truth from preferential bias in justification of selfish incentives.
From my perspective you were an interesting person with potential given the passion of your arguments and the detail in your observations. But through cumulative experience it at least appears you cannot disentangle your rage, bias, and selfishness sufficiently to produce understanding rather than complaint.
To expand our organization and it’s influence, I (we) seek out talent that can be improved. It’s sifting through haystacks for rare needles. But once in a while it does bear fruit. Unfortunately, not in this case.
Cheers

Reply addressees: @spaceangelvoice @a7959705360789