Hmm.. well, you’re correct but … (a) yes self domestication (neotenic evolutio

Hmm.. well, you’re correct but … (a) yes self domestication (neotenic evolution) is the correct answer for the variation between the races (subspecies), but (b) intelligence scales with neotenic evolution, (c) so if we look at all measures of all demonstrated behaviors in all countries worldwide, every single measure correlates with IQ. Every single one, because neoteny correlates with every single one, (e) and while there are tiny variations in personality between the races, and (f) while there EW slightly more meaningful variations in cognitive balance between the races – those that mirror different sex differences in cognition, (g) it’s all the same really: neoteny.
So you are correct in that we emphasize IQ too much, when we should emphasize neotenic evolution (domestication syndrome), and it’s this difference that produces all differences, of which IQ is only one manifestation.
So, yes. You’re correct.
And yes, you’ve identified the problem: “And anglos are also uniquely low in ethnocentricism;”.
However if we look at voting patterns its white women that cause all policy that prevents us from correcting it.

Reply addressees: @RokoMijic @mimi10v3