FIXING THE COMMON CONFUSION OF “LAWS OF NATURE” WITH “NATURAL LAW” OF COOPERATIO

FIXING THE COMMON CONFUSION OF “LAWS OF NATURE” WITH “NATURAL LAW” OF COOPERATION
Both you(Doug) and Martin have an odd habit of confusing the Laws of Nature(persistence) with the natural law (of cooperation).

I realize that the terms “laws of nature” and “Natural Law” are easily confused, but they originate in the sequence of discovered “Laws of Nature” and THUS discovered “Natural Law” of Cooperation, to use as court common and legislative law, as the terms of social, economic, and political cooperation, making possible the defeat those laws through cooperation at political and economic and strategic scales.

Now I know that intuitionistically this is an attractive conflation (falsehood) because it allows you to apply the naturalistic fallacy of the brutality of the laws of nature to the ‘benefits’ of the natural law of cooperation (sovereignty, reciprocity, duty, truth, excellence, and beauty): in other words, non aggression against demonstrated (earned) interests (assets).

But this is not only just a fallacy, but it is a falsehood, and it undermines the Natural Law just as the Abrahamics and the Marxists and the general feminine Left seek to undermine all terms, and redefine them as what they are not: social construction of falsehood: Lying. 😉

Hugs to you both.
Two of my favorite people whom I respect the most.
But you know, what y’all are doing ‘isn’t right’. 😉

CD

Reply addressees: @radiofreenw @AutistocratMS