Peer review is irrelevant. The only worthwhile criteria for a paper is its conte

Peer review is irrelevant. The only worthwhile criteria for a paper is its contents though sometimes the lab or the academic suggests it’s worth a read. I deal with the mainstream sources everyone else does. Most papers are irrelevant, repetitions, or junk. But if you sift through them you do find the occasional useful effort. Never read any philosophy papers though. Not unless you want material for Dilbert comics. 😉
Cheers

Reply addressees: @rightturnjason @NotWill42 @B1TCHEVAPORATE