Monarchs in the anglo-american (germanic) constitutional sense are bound by the

Monarchs in the anglo-american (germanic) constitutional sense are bound by the law except in restoration of the law. In this case the law is the natural law discovered by the evidence of the common law.
This is a via-negative or ‘veto’ monarchy, not one that must burden itself with regular affairs, but one that the people can use as a ‘in case of corruption, break glass’ emergency.
Regularly the monarchy should focus on excellences in the arts, festivals, Rituals of state, community behavior, and the sciences.
The english do a good job and their ‘informal’ constitution is about right, but the parliament is sovereign, NOT THE PEOPLE. Whereas in the USA the PEOPLE are sovereign, not the congress. As such the british monarchy is still at the mercy of parliament, where in the USA an american monarchy would not be.

Reply addressees: @gozlozha_udasha