“Otto Weininger’s famous book ‘Sex and Character’.”– Honestly, I just work with

–“Otto Weininger’s famous book ‘Sex and Character’.”–

Honestly, I just work with the science. I came to similar conclusions by my study of the female-jewish-abrahamic-marxist sequence of warfare (Sedition) and a study of sex differences in lying (linguistic analysis) and then cognition (neuroscience).

But since then I tend to read philosophy and the history of group conflict (especially with the feminine jews) to understand (a) what went wrong, (b) why were are almost uniquely vulnerable to it (c) how to articulate it in law such that it is possible to outlaw.

The fact that theologians, philosophers, historians, and scientists like myself come to roughly the same conclusion, with simple increases in precision due to the spectrum of precision of our cognitive paradigms, is perhaps the best evidence that the findings are correct.

That said it’s a lot easier to understand Weininger (and many other authors) than it is the rather brutal scientific and operational proof in my work that they’re correct. 😉

Cheers

Reply addressees: @KarlRadl @WalterIII