“Your causal relationship is wrong. It’s not Women’s Rights -> Prosperity. It’s

—“Your causal relationship is wrong. It’s not Women’s Rights -> Prosperity. It’s Prosperity -> Women’s rights. Just like Racism does not lead to differential performance. Differential performance sometimes leads to racism.”– @cryptodiaries

We all make mistakes. But I rarely err, and I do not in this circumstance.
If you had any concept of the national or civilizational balance sheet of demonstrated interests in the spectrum of capital, you would never make such a foolish statement.
I see from your fourth sentence
1. race observation is correct
2. you’re presuming it’s a matter of differential performance rather than differential instinct between sex differences in cognition and the result.
3. You’re also incorrect in the first three sentences because it is precisely prosperity that leads to women’s rights and economic contribution. But you’re not stating that it leads to intertemporal institutional hazards, vastly expanding consumption and the negative consequences, the illusion of endless growth, the expansion of debt to accommodate it all, and the destruction of all organizations from social to educational, to economic to political because of this sequence of hyperconsumption WITHOUT the demand for responsibility for capital accumulation and preservation both in and across time.

I suspect you may be smart enough to understand this but that you might need exposition for the purpose of clarification, so please ask if necessary. But under no circumstances assume I err (I don’t), and instead, seek to understand, such that we may find fault with either person’s understanding or communication.

Affections;
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @cryptodiaries @swpwilliams @alessabocchi