PSEUDOSCIENCES Technically speaking the reason I started working on epistemology

PSEUDOSCIENCES
Technically speaking the reason I started working on epistemology, beginning with the sciences, was due to exasperation with nonsense on media:
Physics: As absurd as it sounds, physics went sideways with Cantor, Einstein, Bohr’s re-platonizing of mathematics in physics, the ‘mathiness’ and the Particles in Everything, and string theory nonsense that resulted in the failure of physics over the past seventy years or more.
Diet: Other than eating paleo, drinking a lot of water, and exercise, even if just walking daily, and a bit less frequently lifting weights, and optimally playing team sports even less frequently, almost all dietary claims have been false.
Psychology: Other than behavioral economics, a minority of the work on personality traits and intelligence, and neuroscience, most of it’s been false and quite a bit’s been harmful.
Sociology: Other than behavioral, micro, and social economics, most has been false and quite a bit’s been harmful.
Political Science: Other than political economy, and contemporary natural law, almost all of it’s been false, and almost all of it’s been harmful.
Economics: Other than the descriptive economics that I’ve already mentioned, almost all of it has been harmful and baited populations into hazard resulting in the empowerment of and rent seeking by the financial and political sectors of the economy.
Group Differences: was suppressed so the pseudoscience that evolved were the inversion – the claim that there were none or that they could be ameliorated without extensive eugenics – and this happens to be the worst pseudoscience of all.

Other than diet, every one of those pseudosciences has it’s origins in the jewish to marxist sequence of revolts against european systematic materialism and it’s replacement with pictoral, and emotional, verbalisms.

Cheers