That’s a False Criticism: the argument is that the DISTRIBUTION of CLASS SIZES d

That’s a False Criticism: the argument is that the DISTRIBUTION of CLASS SIZES differs between the races. This absolutely positively unquestionably true. And trying to personalize the truth as an attack on Musk is just intellectually dishonest.
And will stansil is the most absurd left wing propagandist.
You interviewed young people who are on the extreme edge of leftist thought. And not those who have careers that specialize in differences.
In fact even someone as dedicated to NOT advancing racism as Dr Reich, who runs the best genetic research firm in the world, has cautioned that we must come to terms with rather large differences in the genetic expression of racial groups.
The largest differences are:
(a) Evolutionary neoteny and it’s consequences
(b) The impact of neotenic differences in evolution on our self regulation and intelligence.

Every counter argument is a lie.
Quite by accident, I specialize in sex and group differences in lying.
As far as I know I’m the leading researcher in the world on this subject.
And the author of the above video, and Will Stancil, and the marginal researcher from Harvard are all engaging in lying. Where lying means they are seeking to justify a falsehood and a prior rather than disambiguate and testify to the evidence as it exists.

We solved IQ before 2000. We solved sex differences by 2012. We solve race differences by 2018. These differences are easily understood. Their cause is easily understood.

One would need a superior theory in order to compete with the rather obvious data.

We are very clear that the postwar pseudoscientific attempt to falsify darwinian evolution natural selection and group differences caused by geographic isolation and speciation and hybridization as humans spread across the continents has been as intentional a pseudoscientific pursuit as was marxist economics and postmodern literature.

The game is up.

We must learn to govern despite our differences rather than the pretenses that we have none.

Reply addressees: @JoshLekach