I would need to understand how you interpret these terms. The context driving Ha

I would need to understand how you interpret these terms. The context driving Hayek and Mises is their refutation of marxism, so called ‘scientific socialism’, and Keynesianism. Despite that the revolution in economics was the introduction of the combination of the calculus with darwinian evolution. But at the same time those were introduced, Babbage had already failed to systematize computation, so until Turing (and Chomsky’s application of Turing to language) so that mathmatics was still the gold standard and they tried to ‘fit’ math to behavior despite it’s insufficiency, and they ignored evolutionary selection. So we had a vast collapse of human intellectual progress because of babbage’s failure and marx’s pseudoscience, and the failure of wester philosophers’ analytic projct by treating math and in particular set theory as the gold standard instead of evolutionary computation.

Reply addressees: @shade_forrest