You’re probably new. In the future, not just with me, but with any public intell

You’re probably new. In the future, not just with me, but with any public intellectual, you might consider seeking to understand what I’m saying rather than presume what I’m saying given the limits of your current knowledge.
The average time it takes to vaguely understand what I’m talking about appears to be six months.
In this case I’m saying that the organization of the brain is biased in favor of the strategy of the sexes, and that the distribution of these biases is just that, a distribution.
So we can have effeminate male and masculine female cognition regardless of sexual orientation. Likewise, we can have effeminate male and masculine female cognition and sexual orientation. Human development is not mechanistic but probabilistic, and subject to failure by noisy interference from the environment.
The problem at present is that for some reason or some combination of reasons we are seeing an increase in failure of dimorphic development that we have not seen in previous ages.
There are many theories as to why, but given that development continues through 25 or so, and given that development is probabilistic and fragile, it is possible that the number of stressors in the environment of all kinds, both physical and social and psychological are such that developmental failure is increasing.
Which is only a social problem, because as a genetic problem it is self correcting by the eradication of their reproduction.

Affections.
-CD

Reply addressees: @strimoff @AshaLogos