I agree that barret followed teh letter of the constitution. But she is not as w

I agree that barret followed teh letter of the constitution. But she is not as willing to demand clarification or narrow the ruling as are the others who are more concerned about both reversing the expansion of federal discretionary power decreasing the responsibility of the legislature, and forcing return of decisions to the people and the legislatures.
So she made the correct SIMPLE call, but did not fulfill the court’s mission via Scalia to prevent evasion of legislative responsibilty, legislation from the bench, or by executive command, or executive failure to execute.
I will read position if she posted one, her but I assume that I’m correct in my understanding of her decision. THe court is adamant that given the decline in the trust in our institutions to the degree where we are close to civil war.
Given that every illegal is an theft of capital from existing populations and that the purpose of that tolerance of illegal immigration is to capture votes to undermine the constitution it isn’t difficult to make the case which is why it was a close vote. Unfortunately Barrett’s position is demanding the congress make the decision (correct) without using the court to actively force the congress to make the decision. So I expect we will see escalation to the point of civil war continue.

Reply addressees: @TheMelWestbrook @steve_vladeck