(Thoughts) Continuing my march through the remaining literature on legal philoso

(Thoughts)
Continuing my march through the remaining literature on legal philosophy, presently with “Mere Natural Law” by Arkes, and struck yet again to see another example where Justice Kagan is unable to comprehend a most basic understanding of and use of legal reasoning beyond her limited intuitions. This woman is not only unfit for the high court, but unfit for any court other than maybe traffic court at best.
Unfortunately, as much as I respect Justice Barrett who seems to go with the flow of the other conservative justices, the more I study the judicial record, the common problem we have seen in Ginsberg’s willingless to legislate from thee bench aside, it’s increasinly clear that women have no place in the judiciary even if it appears they are of more than adquate value in as attorneys.
This is yet another disappontment – a truth I do not wish to know, nor discuss, nor encode into the law despite it’s necessity.