I always find it fascinating when some commoner tries to inform me about which p

I always find it fascinating when some commoner tries to inform me about which party pays taxes, almost seventy percent of taxes are paid by the wealthy. The fact that tiny fraction of the populace, the wealthy, are most often attracted to the democratic party, has more to do with their asset composition and ability to buy access and influence with that party than it does with their political instincts. Conversely, this does not convey any meaning at all to the non-wealthy participants in either party other than the primary difference between the party affliations is degree of responsibilty for private and common. In other words, the only reason the democratic party wins is single and childless women who always and everywhere vote to escape responsibility. Otherwise the country is solid red. SO the question remains for the rest of the polity, why, if a woman is a hyperconsumer, and not contributing to the production of anotehr generation, or, sometimes worse, a single mother which is reducible to producing infantilized children, and who are universally worse parents than single fathers because of it, then why should the rest of us subsidize this destructive behavior?