WHY ARE MEN AND WOMEN IN SUCH CONFLICT – AND WHY ARE WE FAILING AS A CIVILIZATIO

WHY ARE MEN AND WOMEN IN SUCH CONFLICT – AND WHY ARE WE FAILING AS A CIVILIZATION BECAUSE OF IT?
We have attempted to reverse the totality of human evolutionary history by the comingling of men and women outside of their spheres of perceptua-valuative-cognitive-emotional capacities. Until very recent times, men and women lived very different lives, with men spending most of their time with men, women with women and children, in a division of labor necessary to insure the care of both as they age – even more, necessary for a woman to exit the servitude of her parents which doomed her to poverty in old age. And for men to find care and comfort of ‘the nest’ when men absorb the majority of cellular damage on behalf of the polity.

This experiment is failing – and hard. Women are incapable of the adversarial conditions necessary for economic, political, and strategic competition sufficient to preserve comparative advantage regardless of scale. in other words, women, at least at other than the margin – are incapable of the cognitive and psychological demands of continous self regulation of emotion, impuse, and thought by exercise of reason and dependence upon material facts, to not only preserve but advance adverstarial competition, and in particularly to organize adversarial compeitive networks at industrial, political, and strategic scale.

The opposite occurs: we are declining in competitive comptency by every measure with every influence of teh feminine temperament in organizations larger than a knitting circle – and certaily beyond the Dunbar number.

Women are petty creatures so that they can empathize with and train children more petty than they, just as men are far less petty creatures so that they can empathize and LIMIT the pettiness of women such that aversarial competition can ‘compute by trial and error’ the defeat of the dark forces of others, time, and ignorance in the endless evolutionary battle to discover increasing means of energy conversion per capital that we call ‘ongoing prosperity’. There is no stable state that women so desperately seek. There is only the hamster wheel of time which we must outpace or return to the poverty of our past.

This isn’t a moral statement. It’s just the results of the physical sciences, of which we are all expressions. Sorry.

Cheers

Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation

Reply addressees: @keyladelslay @nenelahot @NoahRevoy